texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
troglodyte, Goldstalker, BEC6566, BBC01, NoCountryForOldMen
119484 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 123,283
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 102,129
Bob Davis 91,909
Pilothawk 83,769
Mark Perry 73,969
JDavis7873ฎ 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,052,281
Posts14,193,282
Members144,484
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax #14961486 01/19/24 12:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,464
J
Jman Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
J
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,464
I have an older F250 that I enjoy rat-a-tat-tatten around town in my 7.3 but my back says it's not interested in that being my daily driver anymore. So I'm ready for a new truck - probably jump into a new half ton GM product by the end of the month.

On the 2024, the Duramax comes standard on some of the upper trim levels I'm looking at. And the 6.2 comes as an additional 1500 option plus the 395 active exhaust.

I'm debating between the two. I've got nothing but positive things to say about Duramax owning papa Duramax before and I know people who get stupid mileage out of the little 3.0. But the thought of a burly V8 sounds kind of attractive and adds an extra sensory experience to my driving. It's 2grand more but what the hell, you can't take it with you.

It won't ever tow more than a bass boat so I don't really care about towing or payload capacity or even much about fuel economy any more.

I'd throw up a poll but I'm too TFF ignorant to do that so wonder what the consensus of my all-knowing, brilliant and opinionated TFF brethren are?


Jim Featherston
Mortgage Loan Officer - NMLS 2509901
Red Diamond Home Loans
PH 972-890-3114
Apply at: RDHLoans.com/Jim
Licensed to Serve Clients in Texas and Florida
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14961502 01/19/24 01:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 494
rebait Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 494
I am looking at purchasing the baby duramax also. Hard to find anything bad about the new version. I like the 30+ mpg on the highway. Never had a diesel but this seems too good to pass up.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14961504 01/19/24 01:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085
If you don't care about fuel economy then the 6.2 is the way to go. I've had my AT4X for 13 months and just turned 20k. Still digging it.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: tmd11111] #14961518 01/19/24 01:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,464
J
Jman Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
J
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,464
Originally Posted by tmd11111
If you don't care about fuel economy then the 6.2 is the way to go. I've had my AT4X for 13 months and just turned 20k. Still digging it.


How's the ride quality tmd? Would you drive it to Florida without wishing you would've taken a plane? That's my measuring stick - I've got kids in Florida I drive to see every so often. And we take her mid size SUV but I feel like a rat in a cage for that long a trip in that thing.


Jim Featherston
Mortgage Loan Officer - NMLS 2509901
Red Diamond Home Loans
PH 972-890-3114
Apply at: RDHLoans.com/Jim
Licensed to Serve Clients in Texas and Florida
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14961532 01/19/24 02:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085
Originally Posted by Jman
Originally Posted by tmd11111
If you don't care about fuel economy then the 6.2 is the way to go. I've had my AT4X for 13 months and just turned 20k. Still digging it.


How's the ride quality tmd? Would you drive it to Florida without wishing you would've taken a plane? That's my measuring stick - I've got kids in Florida I drive to see every so often. And we take her mid size SUV but I feel like a rat in a cage for that long a trip in that thing.


The seats to me and my wife are way more comfortable then my Fords were. In the Fords they seemed very comfortable around town and short trips but anything more than 2 hours and I was in bad pain, have pins and plates in my spine. The seats on my AT4X feel firm but are way more comfortable and have a massage feature. Been on an 8 hour road trip and felt great when I got there.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14962503 01/20/24 02:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 508
T
TXanalogkd Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 508
Based on your travels to Florida (mileage), I would purchase the baby duramax. I currently drive an 05 duramax (daily driver), and I went from a V8 to diesel because I put a lot of miles on my vehicles. I was tired of the frequent oil changes, and tune ups on the V8, and my gas mileage suffered when I pulled the boat.

I met a hot shot driver that also use's his vehicle as a private taxi service, and he is very happy with the baby diesel in his Denali. If you plan to keep this next truck, get the diesel. I'm having a hard time deciding between the Tundra (turbo) or Chevy baby diesel, so I'll just keep driving my 05.

Please let us know what you decide and how you like your next truck.

Last edited by TXanalogkd; 01/20/24 02:05 PM. Reason: Additional comments
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14964883 01/22/24 03:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,690
T
TRH (formerly xpress00) Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,690
I have a 23 LTZ with the LZO Duramax. I love mine. Traded in a poverty edition Ram 6.7 cummins on it and would do it again in a heartbeat. I tow a 23' CC every weekend, normally both days. The ride is great, seats are comfy to me, and the mileage is crazy. It's been a long, long time since I was able to commute back and forth to work all week and then run to the lake on the weekend, all on the same tank of fuel.
Both will obviously pull a bass boat with ease, the duramax will get better MPG's doing it. I'm between 14-15 mpgs pulling my CC according to the truck. You will see reports of high DEF usage on the 3.0, but it hasn't been any different than what the Ram used for me.
But if you want the throaty sound, get the 6.2. The duramax is pretty is quiet.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14965159 01/22/24 07:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 186
M
MCIPinkie Online Content
Outdoorsman
Online Content
Outdoorsman
M
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 186
6.2 all the way. 2021 High Country.

Love it.

Diesel here is $0.38 more than premium gas. $0.68 more than regular.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14965352 01/22/24 11:10 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 503
M
MarcM64 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
M
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 503
Only thing that bothers me about the 3.0, break out the wallet for that oil pump drive belt at the rear of the engine! Plus, those Duramax parts aren't cheap!

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: MarcM64] #14965493 01/23/24 01:04 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,230
Chris B Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,230
Originally Posted by MarcM64
Only thing that bothers me about the 3.0, break out the wallet for that oil pump drive belt at the rear of the engine! Plus, those Duramax parts aren't cheap!

How much does it cost? I know you only have to do it at 200,000 miles. I like how it makes more torque than the 6.2 for pulling.


[Linked Image]
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: MCIPinkie] #14965641 01/23/24 03:13 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
D
Duke 22 Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
D
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
Originally Posted by MCIPinkie
6.2 all the way. 2021 High Country.

Love it.

Diesel here is $0.38 more than premium gas. $0.68 more than regular.

IF the little Duramax is getting 30 mpg, and the 6.2 wont sniff 20 mpg going downhill with a tailwind, the difference in fuel cost is more than offset by the difference in fuel in mileage. JMHO

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Chris B] #14965742 01/23/24 10:11 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 503
M
MarcM64 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
M
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 503
Originally Posted by Chris B
Originally Posted by MarcM64
Only thing that bothers me about the 3.0, break out the wallet for that oil pump drive belt at the rear of the engine! Plus, those Duramax parts aren't cheap!

How much does it cost? I know you only have to do it at 200,000 miles. I like how it makes more torque than the 6.2 for pulling.

Seen prices as low as $3000 and as high as $6000. Other than that, most people that have them, love them!

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14966178 01/23/24 07:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 165
B
Buchbass2 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 165
Love the 6.2, when you consider the DEF and higher price for diesel it comes out about even mileage wise, and diesel upkeep will be more also.

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14967302 01/24/24 08:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175
P
patriot07 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175
6.2


Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
- Soren Kierkegaard
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14968910 01/26/24 11:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
Bandit 200 XP Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
I would love to have a 6.2 , i have had 9 Chevy 5.3's

Last edited by Bandit 200 XP; 01/27/24 08:32 AM.


Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14969353 01/26/24 07:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 893
TexasTechliprip Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 893
my 6.2 is garbage

2022 with 29K miles and I have blown the engine, new radiator and a boatload of other problems.

Service techs tell me these have been popping like crazy

I would already be in the 3.0 if they were not going to gut me on the trade


[Linked Image]
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14969981 01/27/24 12:24 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
Bandit 200 XP Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
I would be pissed if i had 6.2 to do that , sorry to hear that .



Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14972954 01/30/24 04:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,714
L
Lone_Wolf Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,714
This pro is using the baby duramax as his tow vehicle...

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14982522 02/09/24 01:51 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,714
L
Lone_Wolf Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,714
...and a not so positive review

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14999805 02/26/24 01:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 780
M
Mark Wendler Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
M
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 780
Had a 6.2L GMC and went to the 3.0L Baby Duramax in my next GMC. Would make the same decision again without hesitation.



Bass Club of Fort Worth

"The answer to every problem in life is to go fishing. The bigger the problem, the longer the trip"
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #15101571 06/14/24 07:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
Bandit 200 XP Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 15,325
I bought a baby Duramax Z71 about a month ago , i like it , traded in a 2020 Z71 , gas . Been a long time since i had a diesel , Blazer 4x4 banana

Last edited by Bandit 200 XP; 06/14/24 07:59 AM.


Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #15108368 06/22/24 02:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 308
O
onfirecrappie Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
O
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 308
I have a 2021 LTZ with the 3.0 Duramax and it has been a great truck so far, 59K miles in. For what itโ€™s worth I traded a 2013 LT with the 5.3 gas, it was getting about 16 mpg and the new Duramax averages about 26 and about 22 when pulling my 17โ€™ aluminum boat.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3