Forums59
Topics1,052,627
Posts14,200,695
Members144,496
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Chris B]
#14853654
10/02/23 03:22 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 19,006
YEE_YEE
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 19,006 |
Now we’re complaining about how we blow out teams? And the Defense shouldn't be scoring touchdowns they should just down the ball and force Dak to score touchdowns.
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: patriot07]
#14853660
10/02/23 03:26 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 43,941
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 43,941 |
How long did it take for you to come up with that nonsense Longer than you guys took to think about the question apparently I'm not sure yiu can call them lost when you didn't even realize he was inactive for the game. I don't think it works that way. Let's be real they are paying Dak like he is their future and are about to give him a new contract that is even bigger abd better. Do you really think they are gonna bench him for Lance? A 4th rounder is not a high price to pay for a good backup QB. Tge reason Lance is sitting is he us still not up to speed on the Cowboys offense as ge had zero off season or training camp to digest it and he gets maybe 5-10 reps at practice with the starters if he is lucky. It's common sense why he is being vrought up to speed slowly. Tgere is no reason to rush it at all. Bench him for Lance? No. Give Lance some snaps to avoid Dak being injured while giving Trey a chance to run the part of the playbook he's familiar with against a real NFL defense? I'd think that's reasonable. Yeah, they're about to give Dak a new contract which will be just as dumb and unproductive towards winning a super bowl as the last one. Just frustrating I guess is my point. If we aren't gonna use a 30-point game to start building for the future, when are we gonna do it? Dak is 100 percent getting another contract, he is no where near getting benched. Rush is the back up and does a fine job of that at this point. Dak might not be Tom Brady but there are plenty of worse qbs starting in the nfl. Lance couldn't win the back up job in San Fran. Lance won't be the future I assure you of that. I would question why we have him at all.
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Chris B]
#14853666
10/02/23 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,585
UTDmiller
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,585 |
Also to note, Lance is the emergency 3rd string QB right now. He can not come in the game unless both dak and rush are out with injury
John Miller
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Chris B]
#14853711
10/02/23 04:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,084
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,084 |
Now we’re complaining about how we blow out teams? Crazy isn't it? Style pointing wins. Like they even knew it was gonna be a 35ot blowout to even leave Lance on the active roster for the game.
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Chris B]
#14853719
10/02/23 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 15,581
Mo
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 15,581 |
MY BACKYARD , 20,000 ACRES , NO MOWING
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Mo]
#14853721
10/02/23 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,084
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,084 |
|
|
Re: Official Cowboys vs Patriots
[Re: Chris B]
#14853964
10/02/23 09:05 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 56,844
RayBob
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 56,844 |
Bench him for Lance? No. Give Lance some snaps to avoid Dak being injured while giving Trey a chance to run the part of the playbook he's familiar with against a real NFL defense? I'd think that's reasonable.
Yeah, they're about to give Dak a new contract which will be just as dumb and unproductive towards winning a super bowl as the last one. Just frustrating I guess is my point. If we aren't gonna use a 30-point game to start building for the future, when are we gonna do it?
Dak is 100 percent getting another contract, he is no where near getting benched. Rush is the back up and does a fine job of that at this point. Dak might not be Tom Brady but there are plenty of worse qbs starting in the nfl. Lance couldn't win the back up job in San Fran. Lance won't be the future I assure you of that. I would question why we have him at all. There you go again. This can't be you can it??????? ↓↓↓↓↓
Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|