My God, you’re either the most naive person I’ve ever encountered or just a compulsive liar with 0 common sense.

It was either the Presidents family or a senior adviser, period.
According to Seb.Gorka, a former cabinet member, everybody else like visitors and press is searched.

Its called rational. Common sense, by definition, requires sound judgement. Processing information.
In this thread you throw out the poo and take what little that makes sense.

Or follow as you apparently ascribe to.

Correction, you’re just ignorant and a compulsive liar.

My God, you’re either the most naive person I’ve ever encountered or just a compulsive liar with 0 common sense.

Thats one possibility.
All the wild ones here, no matter how unlikely, may be right.
We just don't know but the wild stuff presented as if its Hunter is dumb IMO.

A tourist, an employee, Hunter or even someone planting it to cause a media frenzy could be at the bottom of it.
Hunter, because he left the WH two days before it was found and had been off cocaine for years and did not do powdered cocaine when he was a druggie are several pieces that lead me to believe he's the least likely to have done it.


Instead, Hunter/White House/cocaine and we have a show no matter what the evidence is.

Correction, you’re just ignorant and a compulsive liar.

Thats one possibility.
All the wild ones here, no matter how unlikely, may be right.
We just don't know but the wild stuff presented as if its Hunter is dumb IMO.

A tourist, an employee, Hunter or even someone planting it to cause a media frenzy could be at the bottom of it.
Hunter, because he left the WH two days before it was found and had been off cocaine for years and did not do powdered cocaine when he was a druggie are several pieces that lead me to believe he's the least likely to have done it.


Instead, Hunter/White House/cocaine and we have a show no matter what the evidence is.

Liar? On this thread only there are a great number of things that are contrived and you know it.
Not one from me and it appears you agree with stupid.

I'll take your derision. You eat the cheese.

This post, specifically saying Hunter is “least likely” and that he has been clean of cocaine for four years, is AT LEAST as bad as someone saying it 100% Hunter’s bag. But really, it’s worse, especially for someone claiming they’re using “common sense” while everyone assuming it’s Hunter’s bag are reaching and dumb.

It’s “wild stuff” to assume that the president’s adult son, who has a very well-documented history of drug use (thanks to him recording it extremely thoroughly), is at least as likely as anyone else to be the culprit, given that he is going to have more access and less security scrutiny than a visitor, low level staffer, or a nefarious actor planting drugs.

Hunter was discharged from the Navy after testing positive for cocaine. He’s had numerous relapses and been in rehab several times. Claiming he’s sober because he says so (or did four years ago) is “wild stuff” or at best, coming from someone who has no idea how drug addiction works for the majority of people.

Is there a chance it was someone else’s bag? Yes. But “common sense” would dictate you look at the most likely suspect and the rest of the circumstances: found in a non-visitor section of the White House, ignoring the fact that it’s extremely difficult for a visitor to smuggle illicit drugs into the White House, and if they did, the SS would know who it was within an hour after reviewing security footage and investigating. Oh, and the facts that the White House isn’t being forthcoming, the story continues to change and Hunter was there two days prior acting erratically make ruling Hunter out as emphatically as you are the opposite of common sense.

Get off your high horse, Allison. This is pathetic.