texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
BX19gti, Likesfishing, db89, OlePhart11, Rick P
119199 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 119,880
Bigbob_FTW 95,524
John175☮ 85,945
Pilothawk 83,279
Bob Davis 82,755
Mark Perry 72,532
Derek 🐝 68,324
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,312
Posts13,962,696
Members144,199
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: Mckinneycrappiecatcher] #14298315 02/26/22 08:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
R
redchevy Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
Originally Posted by Mckinneycrappiecatcher
I’ve heard the 5.3 in those year models is pretty weak. A ford ecoboost is a good option in that year range. 3.55 or 3.73 rear end will cruise in 6th gear in most cases, might downshift to 5th on a fairly steep hill with that load. They make max torque in the 2500 rpm range so you cruise at max torque.

They will be weak compared to an ecoboost but pretty sure 2014 was a year they got a 50 ish hp bump. If you keep it in an rpm range where it makes power it will tow fine sub 2000 is not where you want to be.

Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: redchevy] #14367730 05/14/22 03:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 30
S
Squarebill41 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
S
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 30
DuraMax lover here. I had a 2017 HD2500 and it was a beast and would pull anything I wanted, only problem was when empty it would rattle your teeth even when lowering the air pressure in tires. The trips down the PINS were terribly on my wife and I and one trip about 22 miles down she yelled at me to stop and get rid of this tank because her neck was hurting from the rough ride. I purchased a 2020 1/2 ton GMC Sierra with the 3.0 Duramax and it is like driving a caddy. Going to the beach my best mileage has been 31 and and towing my 21 Triton it will be about 15mpg. Best move ever and if you get one make sure you get the multipro tailgate to get in the back. It's a back saver to get in with that step. I had a 2015 5.3 in a half ton and towing a 28ft RV was a joke around the hills by three rivers, thought i was gonna have to get out and help push. LOL

Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14368018 05/15/22 12:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,942
Notaguide Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,942
Originally Posted by lilBr.
Having trouble deciding on whether to get a 5.3 or 6.2. Looking in the 2014 to 2018 version of the GM / Chevy - mainly because of the adjustable pedals. I tow a 21' bass boat. I know they will both tow it but I like to set the cruise on 80 or so and just go - most of my trips average 5 - 7 hours towing the boat, and 75% of the miles I drive my truck are with the boat. The 6.2 recommends the premium fuel. I have had two older (2011) 6.2 and they were great but I did not get good fuel mileage with them. Never owned a 5.3 but a couple of buddies have and they seem to struggle up a hill with a head wind. I would like a diesel but I don't feel its practical for the increased cost towing no more weight than I do.

Thoughts?



I've got a 15 with a 6.2. Would never own another 5.3. Average 18mpg not towing. I've never put more than 87 octane in it because computers yo.

Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: AirForceAngler] #14371054 05/18/22 03:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,104
R
reelswift Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,104
Originally Posted by AirForceAngler
I have a 2021 Silverado Z71/RST with the 6.2 and 10 speed. Loving this truck so far. Running empty on the interstate, I regularly get 20+ mpg at 75. It has gotten as good as 25 with a slight tail wind. I usually run 89 octane in it but will use 91 if I know I'm going to be towing bigger loads. I frequently pull 24' or 26' box trailers for my daughter's high school band and it pulls those great as well and that's when I'll use 91 fuel.


^^^^^ Exactly


Team LVS34
Captain WNB
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14385102 06/04/22 09:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 832
D
Diablosandwich Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
D
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 832
Originally Posted by lilBr.
Thanks for the input - now I have people telling me to consider the little duramax.


I agree. Love mine. Same amount of torque as the 5.3, but you get it immediately, not higher in the power band.


VHF 16/68
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14385320 06/05/22 03:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 317
P
Paper mouth Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
P
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 317
Gas is to expensive for the 6.2


Livescope, ruining a body of water near you!
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14387849 06/08/22 01:36 AM
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 582
F
FXfromTx Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
F
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 582
3.0L duramax


"The fishing was good; it was the catching that was bad."
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14432539 07/28/22 01:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,150
krawlin 47 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,150
I would read up on these motors and search for issues....I thought my 2021 AT4 would be invincible...and it was for 14,000 miles.

Ive got the 6.2 which is a beast of a motor - lifter banks are a real issue...I found this out two weeks ago as my truck failed on vacation...bent lifter rods and other problems...waited for my truck to be repaired in Colorado for a week...then picked it up and got 50 miles down the road to have the same thing happen again...limped it home and now having to have it fixed again. UGH.

Be careful and do your homework. When I asked both the dealer in Colorado and the Dealer here in Dallas if this was a common problems - they both see this "all the time". In their words - not mine.


Whether you think you can or you can't, you are probably right.
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: krawlin 47] #14432840 07/28/22 05:11 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,318
Chris B Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,318
Originally Posted by krawlin 47
I would read up on these motors and search for issues....I thought my 2021 AT4 would be invincible...and it was for 14,000 miles.

Ive got the 6.2 which is a beast of a motor - lifter banks are a real issue...I found this out two weeks ago as my truck failed on vacation...bent lifter rods and other problems...waited for my truck to be repaired in Colorado for a week...then picked it up and got 50 miles down the road to have the same thing happen again...limped it home and now having to have it fixed again. UGH.

Be careful and do your homework. When I asked both the dealer in Colorado and the Dealer here in Dallas if this was a common problems - they both see this "all the time". In their words - not mine.

That stinks. Sounds like the repair was not done correctly. I have two friends with new 6.2s that haven’t had a single problem and love their trucks.


[Linked Image]
I hate photobucket.
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: Chris B] #14439462 08/04/22 04:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,150
krawlin 47 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,150
Originally Posted by Chris B
Originally Posted by krawlin 47
I would read up on these motors and search for issues....I thought my 2021 AT4 would be invincible...and it was for 14,000 miles.

Ive got the 6.2 which is a beast of a motor - lifter banks are a real issue...I found this out two weeks ago as my truck failed on vacation...bent lifter rods and other problems...waited for my truck to be repaired in Colorado for a week...then picked it up and got 50 miles down the road to have the same thing happen again...limped it home and now having to have it fixed again. UGH.

Be careful and do your homework. When I asked both the dealer in Colorado and the Dealer here in Dallas if this was a common problems - they both see this "all the time". In their words - not mine.

That stinks. Sounds like the repair was not done correctly. I have two friends with new 6.2s that haven’t had a single problem and love their trucks.


So when I overstate a problem...I like to fix it. After further review by Sewell GMC (insanely good experience here-never been before) I learned that my problems were a simple fix due to an incomplete job in Colorado Springs....Spark Plugs never got tightened LOL - OMG I fought that thing all the way home LOL. I'm gonna keep it...Be crazy not to I guess...bought a month before prices went haywire - the same truck costs 20 grand more today so I need to give this a shot after cooling down!


Whether you think you can or you can't, you are probably right.
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14501592 10/11/22 12:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,028
SkeeterHawk Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,028
Do Not get a GM truck with AFM or DFM. They are junk waiting to fail.

Had an '08 with 5.3 , AFM lifters collapsed and ate the camshaft. GM wouldn't own up to their bad lifters and they knew.

Dumb arse me thinking they had the lifter issue fixed by 2017, but no I had a AFM lifter collapse at 28K miles and luckily didn't damage the camshaft. Repaired under warranty.

Also had 3 fuel injectors fail too. Truck was out of bumper to bumper and fuel injectors aren't covered under the powertrain. Yet they are covered for Californians for up to 150K miles.

Now my entertainment touch screen has bit the dust at 36K miles.

No, I didn't buy a lemon. Just go on the GM forums and you will see what I'm talking about.

Did you here about the latest class action GM just lost due to oil consumption issues?

Chevy is building junk in my opinion. Correction GM is building junk.

Last edited by SkeeterHawk; 10/11/22 12:57 PM.
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: SkeeterHawk] #14502083 10/11/22 08:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26,175
P
patriot07 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26,175
Originally Posted by SkeeterHawk
Do Not get a GM truck with AFM or DFM. They are junk waiting to fail.

Had an '08 with 5.3 , AFM lifters collapsed and ate the camshaft. GM wouldn't own up to their bad lifters and they knew.

Dumb arse me thinking they had the lifter issue fixed by 2017, but no I had a AFM lifter collapse at 28K miles and luckily didn't damage the camshaft. Repaired under warranty.

Also had 3 fuel injectors fail too. Truck was out of bumper to bumper and fuel injectors aren't covered under the powertrain. Yet they are covered for Californians for up to 150K miles.

Now my entertainment touch screen has bit the dust at 36K miles.

No, I didn't buy a lemon. Just go on the GM forums and you will see what I'm talking about.

Did you here about the latest class action GM just lost due to oil consumption issues?

Chevy is building junk in my opinion. Correction GM is building junk.

I agree GM with AFM is among the least reliable of the big name trucks these days. Co-worker brought a brand new Tahoe and I was in it with her when it started making crazy noises. She pulled it over and had it towed to the dealer and had the lifters replaced. 5,000 miles on it.

Most reliable is a Ford 5.0, Ram 5.7, or Tundra 5.7. Ram's 8-speed transmission is the best trans in a half ton IMHO.

Chevy makes good trucks outside of AFM. My L5P Duramax is a powerful beast. The baby Duramax in half tons is pretty reliable. Just don't touch their AFM engines.


Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
- Soren Kierkegaard
Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14503102 10/12/22 07:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 301
R
romeroxl1200 Online Content
Angler
Online Content
Angler
R
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 301
I went from 2016 Tacoma V6 to 2023 2500HD 6.6L gas, been getting 15mpg whether towing boat or not...forget about the boat behind me now.....has a little pep. Stayed away from the diesel...

Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: romeroxl1200] #14503112 10/12/22 07:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,198
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,198
Originally Posted by romeroxl1200
I went from 2016 Tacoma V6 to 2023 2500HD 6.6L gas, been getting 15mpg whether towing boat or not...forget about the boat behind me now.....has a little pep. Stayed away from the diesel...


I'm actually shopping a new 2500 HD Denali with the 6.6 gas. I know it don't have near the power as my F250 PS but I've driven nothing but F150's and F250's for the past 15 years and am getting board with them. Feel like every time I get a new truck its just like my old one. Time for a change.

Re: GM 5.3 or 6.2 [Re: lilBr.] #14592697 01/10/23 04:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 364
B
Bryan O' Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
B
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 364
The 6.2, especially with the new 10 speed, is a hoss, and will easily pull a 21' boat. We've had 2 6.2's and both were great motors - both in Denali SUV's. We had a 5.3 1/2 tom truck, and it did struggle with hills, and drank the gas while pulling (7 mpg). I know this is a 5.3 / 6.2 post, but I've heard great things about the little Duramax. I'm on my 4th 3/4 tom Duramax and love them. If I didn't need it for gooseneck hauling, I'd think about the small D-Max.


Bryan O'
Total Recreation Products Inc.
Commercial Park and Playground Products and Services
totalrecreation.net
Ranger Z521c 250ProXS V8
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3