texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
BX19gti, Likesfishing, db89, OlePhart11, Rick P
119199 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 119,887
Bigbob_FTW 95,558
John175ā˜® 85,945
Pilothawk 83,279
Bob Davis 82,783
Mark Perry 72,533
JDavis7873® 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,331
Posts13,962,997
Members144,199
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14261977 01/25/22 01:36 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,221
D
Drodge Offline
Drum Boy
Offline
Drum Boy
D
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7,221
I was in the same boat as you are and I went with a designated Garmin 1022 last week. David with shut up and fish hooked me up. I feel like the Garmin had some advantages.

I feel the 20 degree cone angle is helpful compared to the 18 degree from lowrance.
The knob is best for quick adjustments on the fly.

Iā€™m no pro these are just my opinions.


[Linked Image]

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14262106 01/25/22 03:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 107
F
FisherMenz Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
F
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 107
I love my Garmin, but AT looks great as well.

Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14262172 01/25/22 04:41 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 19,200
ToadSnatcher14 Offline
Team Slot Fish
Offline
Team Slot Fish
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 19,200
I know that front deck

Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: goodman_fishing] #14262630 01/25/22 05:05 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 251
W
wug Online Content OP
Angler
OP Online Content
Angler
W
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 251
Great Video!! Garmin is #1 with Lowrance #2 choice (simple ops. for simple mind-me) Now for size and cost- would like 12" but budget says....maybe.

Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14263124 01/25/22 10:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 160
LFA17 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 160
Seems that Lowrance live is more expensive, but in line with the more expensive Garmin displays. I ended up buying Lowrance Carbon 12's at half price during the BassPro sale. I don't know if it's true or not, but I saw several references to having to adjust the Garmin all the time. Lowrance claims set it and forget it. That was the deciding factor for me. Active target has been amazing for me. I added the rite-hite turret mount for the AT transducer so I can spot lock and scan the AT independently.

Last edited by LFA17; 01/25/22 10:37 PM.

Ranger Z521C
Mercury ProXS 250
LFA Bass Club
Boomer Sooner
Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: LFA17] #14263146 01/25/22 10:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,183
C
coachallentca Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,183
Originally Posted by LFA17
Seems that Lowrance live is more expensive, but in line with the more expensive Garmin displays. I ended up buying Lowrance Carbon 12's at half price during the BassPro sale. I don't know if it's true or not, but I saw several references to having to adjust the Garmin all the time. Lowrance claims set it and forget it. That was the deciding factor for me. Active target has been amazing for me. I added the rite-hite turret mount for the AT transducer so I can spot lock and scan the AT independently.


You will find the same thing with active target.. Each body of water is different so you will tweak it a little bit on each lake. With Water clarity you will tweak it also. If every lake you could see 10ft down then you would not need to adjust it.. I tweak my livescope a little bite on each lake but not much.. The reason I went with Garmin is because I already had garmins. I don't think you can go wrong either way..

Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14265052 01/27/22 06:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,679
PEDRO H. Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,679
I have run both. And both work well.
made the switch to Lowrance since I run all lowrance stuff already.
picked up a carbon 12 & 16 on sale during thanksgiving .
AT has a better forward range even with a smaller cone. I also find that I don't mess with my settings nearly as much as I did with my LS.


Pete B. Hernandez
Matthew 4:19

www.funnsunboats.com
Re: Pan Optics vs Active Target [Re: wug] #14265123 01/27/22 07:09 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 251
W
wug Online Content OP
Angler
OP Online Content
Angler
W
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 251
Well, went with 9" Lowrance....now I need to learn how to operate and interpret what I see. Played with Both at Bass Pro and like the ease of operation of the Lowrance. How does the Active Target show fish at a lake like Fayette that has grass?

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3