texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
CrankyVet, Cowtownhound, Bob81, juan2025, Mjlucky
119648 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,175
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,395
Bob Davis 97,598
John175☮ 86,150
Pilothawk 83,940
Mark Perry 74,893
Derek 🐝 68,517
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,059,296
Posts14,317,435
Members144,648
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252225 01/17/22 01:00 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
N
NoWeighers Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
Quote: "I understand not wanting to donate a 13+ to a hatchery so far away; so did this develop a local culture of ignoring the Sharelunker program?"

I sure hope so..


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: Fishspanker] #14252241 01/17/22 01:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,282
Fishinfellow Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,282
Originally Posted by Fishspanker
They should have kept it for 13+ only.


Program needed a shot of adrenaline to drum up more interest and promotional dollars. When they changed it to 8 lbs and up, all of the sudden catching a "sharelunker" became achievable for far more people than ever before. As much as I completely understand your sentiment, I think ultimately, its been good for the program.


Thats my money fish
[Linked Image]
Kris Winhold
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: Fishinfellow] #14252243 01/17/22 01:33 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15,425
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15,425
Originally Posted by Fishinfellow
Originally Posted by Fishspanker
They should have kept it for 13+ only.


Program needed a shot of adrenaline to drum up more interest and promotional dollars. When they changed it to 8 lbs and up, all of the sudden catching a "sharelunker" became achievable for far more people than ever before. As much as I completely understand your sentiment, I think ultimately, its been good for the program.


Agreed

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252388 01/17/22 03:28 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25,316
L
lconn4 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
L
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 25,316
Lots of folks that were just starting out or were bank fishermen had never even heard of the program, lowering the size and making it available to those who could measure, photo, and release opened their eyes. I think it was a great idea to make more people get involved. I fish at Monti a lot and I guarantee you there are some bank fisherman that bought a measuring device. roflmao Hopefully it will make more people aware of slot limits and minimum sizes for other species as well. cheers


A good rule of angling philosophy is not to interfere with another fisherman's ways of being happy, unless you want to be hated.
Zane Grey, Tales of Fishes, 1919

https://vimeo.com/73372194
https://vimeo.com/72859045

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252459 01/17/22 04:08 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,288
buda13 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,288
I don’t understand all the negativity for the 8,9, and 10+ lb classes added to the program. Your giving TPWD biologists excellent information, especially if you provide a scale sample. No different than the program at Fork years ago that asked all anglers to report catches over 7 lbs to the marinas. Take a few minutes and help out the folks that make our fisheries so awesome.

I get why the folks at Falcon don’t want their 13+ fish removed, but IF you want to get people coming back to that lake wouldn’t 100 entries of 8 lbs or better fish documented through the SAL site get some buzz stirring? Or as a guide if you certified every fish over 8 through SAL that’s boated during trips wouldn’t that be an awesome advertising point? “Blah blah guide service, over 50 fish submitted to the SAL program in 2021”. I guess if business is so good and y’all don’t need tourists to come fish the lake then it’s a moot point and all is well.


Lake Worth Workingmans Tournaments
Every Wednesday from April 2nd to end of August
$50 entry + $10 Side Pot - 100% Payout
6pm - 9pm

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: buda13] #14252550 01/17/22 05:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,224
D
David Burton Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
D
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,224
Originally Posted by buda13
I don’t understand all the negativity for the 8,9, and 10+ lb classes added to the program. Your giving TPWD biologists excellent information, especially if you provide a scale sample. No different than the program at Fork years ago that asked all anglers to report catches over 7 lbs to the marinas. Take a few minutes and help out the folks that make our fisheries so awesome.

I get why the folks at Falcon don’t want their 13+ fish removed, but IF you want to get people coming back to that lake wouldn’t 100 entries of 8 lbs or better fish documented through the SAL site get some buzz stirring? Or as a guide if you certified every fish over 8 through SAL that’s boated during trips wouldn’t that be an awesome advertising point? “Blah blah guide service, over 50 fish submitted to the SAL program in 2021”. I guess if business is so good and y’all don’t need tourists to come fish the lake then it’s a moot point and all is well.

It is very similar to Florida's program now that they want the 8lb details. For those that scoff at the 13lbers 'leaving the lake', there is only a short window throughout the year. I don't see the negativity toward the program, either. Of course, beyond the two years where they lost some fish, but they appear to have learned from their mistakes. At least they realized they needed to adjust things, if not truly learning and admitting failure in some instances rather than the "Blame Game" they played.


David Burton
2015 Skeeter FX 21 +Ultrex +Helix 12 (x3) +Mega360 +MegaLive
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: the skipper] #14252617 01/17/22 05:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 364
Z
ZX4545 Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Z
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by the skipper
The internet kills lakes.

hide2

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252745 01/17/22 07:08 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
N
NoWeighers Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
Two years they lost fish?


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252756 01/17/22 07:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,796
C
CCTX Online Content OP
mapquest
OP Online Content
mapquest
C
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,796
Lost fish (if memory serves) = A few years back, a couple/a few donated SALs didn’t survive long into the program; never releasing eggs at the hatchery or making it back to their original lakes.


[Linked Image]
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252818 01/17/22 08:03 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
N
NoWeighers Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
I encourage you to go back thru SL records from the beginning..

There is only one conclusion that one with open eyes can come to.

SL does not grow bigger fish faster.. It does not grow bigger fish..

It has killed many big fish..

Released SL fish quit growing after being returned to their home lake, with one exception of a few ounces I believe.. This being fish that are recaught.

It has encouraged the removal of our biggest fish from their home water that had the potential (given their huge size already) to break the state record which at one time was the goal of the program..

Don't make me use PAW'S own data to prove it.. You can do it yourself, as I have done.. And have posted before.


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252874 01/17/22 08:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,796
C
CCTX Online Content OP
mapquest
OP Online Content
mapquest
C
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,796
James, I agree with you. The enormous power of natural selection far eclipses any effect breeding 550 or so 13lbers over the course of 30 years would have on the state wide genetics of a bass population.

The secondary benefits of marketing, furthering marine biology science, increasing public knowledge, and job creation, etc do have some value.


[Linked Image]
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252898 01/17/22 09:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,931
T
Tx Tree Grower Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,931
I'm to the point that I wish TPWD would just focus 100% on its fishery management and hatchery space on Catfish, Striper/hybrids, Crappie, sunfish, and trout. That way bass fishermen would have something really valid to gripe about. Man this topic just gets beat to death on here.

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14252912 01/17/22 09:20 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
N
NoWeighers Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,859
Don't it though..


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: NoWeighers] #14254759 01/19/22 01:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15,425
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 15,425
Originally Posted by NoWeighers
I encourage you to go back thru SL records from the beginning..

There is only one conclusion that one with open eyes can come to.

SL does not grow bigger fish faster.. It does not grow bigger fish..

It has killed many big fish..

Released SL fish quit growing after being returned to their home lake, with one exception of a few ounces I believe.. This being fish that are recaught.

It has encouraged the removal of our biggest fish from their home water that had the potential (given their huge size already) to break the state record which at one time was the goal of the program..

Don't make me use PAW'S own data to prove it.. You can do it yourself, as I have done.. And have posted before.


Problem with this rational is you can't prove that if they had not been caught they would have gotten any bigger or lived any longer.

Re: Please explain/rationalize this [Re: CCTX] #14255687 01/20/22 01:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,891
slim 285 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,891
If you listen to the (Pro’s) TPWD does the best job of any where in the USA

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2025 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3