texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
NicoFishing, ooo, Swvern, Tenaska Frontier, MJB
119432 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 122,566
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 100,969
Bob Davis 90,213
John175☮ 86,097
Pilothawk 83,684
Mark Perry 73,654
Derek 🐝 68,436
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,049,988
Posts14,149,960
Members144,432
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: Hookem] #13683627 08/28/20 05:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100,969
Bigbob_FTW Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100,969
Originally Posted by Hookem
The Jade Helm threads were hilarious.



[Linked Image]


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: lakeforkfisherman] #13683631 08/28/20 06:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,705
J
Jpurdue Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
J
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,705
I have not watched the news or scrolled through social media in 6+ weeks.

[Linked Image]


"Bragging may not bring happiness, but no man having caught a large fish goes home through an alley." -A.L.

www.LunkerLore.com

[Linked Image]
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: donothin] #13683636 08/28/20 06:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,321
F
Flags Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
F
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,321
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Yeah, we need more 17 yo kids with long guns out supporting the police.


Active duty military is a lot different than that kid. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that? Let me guess, you never served right? I'm betting "donothin" isn't just a user name but a way of life for you.

Sorry, you are wrong about me. And yes, i know that active duty military is a lot different than a kid and never implied otherwise.
Actually you did. When someone mentions sending troops you equated the troops with that kid. Your idiotic implication is plainly visible.

But, I also sending armed servicemen in against citizens is a very dangerous thing to do and smacks of Marxism, Nazism or some other kind of authoritarian kind of government.
No it isn't. The Constitution has a provision for it if the gov of a state officially requests help. And in this case, nobody has sent out armed servicemen not have they officially suggested it. The OP is asking a question. Show me where trump has said he is sending active duty troops in. Only he can authorize that and he has not said he is going to do it. Govs can mobilize the Natl Guard within their own states and those are not considered active duty troops.

You have absolutely no business teaching young kids.
Why? Because I will teach them what the Constitution says and means? Because I teach them to think for themselves? Because I teach them that they can make up their own minds? I am exactly what they need teaching kids because I offer a different viewpoint than the LIB agenda.I'm going to bet you don't even have any kids.

You may have been in the military, but you are clueless to the parameters that are in place.
Actually because I was in the military I fully understand the parameters in place. If you bother looking at the post I made on this thread about the parameters, I pretty well covered them. Since you don't seem to be intelligent enough to actually see what I wrote, I'll help you. This is on the first page of comments and is 2nd to the bottom:
Quote
Because it is illegal to do so unless the gov of the state in question specifically allows the federal govt to disperse active duty troops in their state. Remember the Natl Guard does not work for the feds, they work for the govs. This goes way back to the founding of the nation where the states had their own miltia and they wanted to protect states rights and not give the fed govt a blank check to rule over them.


So tell me Genius, where am I wrong?


You're really not very bright are you? I'll take you rant above as an admission that you never served and have never done anything. Why don't you do us all a favor and go play in traffic?


Retired Navy Chief Signalman
NJROTC Instructor Los Fresnos High School
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: lakeforkfisherman] #13683638 08/28/20 06:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100,969
Bigbob_FTW Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 100,969
popcorn2


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: Flags] #13683642 08/28/20 06:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
DrewJ Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 155
Originally Posted by Flags
Quote
Why not call in the Marines?


Because it is illegal to do so unless the gov of the state in question specifically allows the federal govt to disperse active duty troops in their state. Remember the Natl Guard does not work for the feds, they work for the govs. This goes way back to the founding of the nation where the states had their own miltia and they wanted to protect states rights and not give the fed govt a blank check to rule over them.

This is the same reason that the USN and the USMC were not allowed to go ashore in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. There was a battle group less than 100 miles south of LA standing by to assist (I was on one of the ships) but Gov Blanco of LA refused to give permission for the troops to land. I assure you that debacle at the Super Dome would have happened if she had allowed us ashore.


I was at the debacle at the Superdome as part of the OK Guard QRF. This was like a day or two after the hurricane so very much unknown. Lived in the parking garage there for a few weeks. Most of what was reported inside were just rumors. Thankfully we did not have orders to shoot looters. Did not want that on my concious. After a couple days it calmed down and we were just there helping neighbors. Don't understand the thought of stacking bodies. Both sides have forgotten how to be decent to each other. Side note about looters, one place we stayed at was on the river where there was a police command station. All of the cops were driving around in luxury SUVs and trucks with no tags...

Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: RayBob] #13683645 08/28/20 06:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 32,542
D
deerfeeder Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 32,542
Originally Posted by RayBob
[quote=Flags]
Quote
Why not call in the Marines?


Because it is illegal to do so unless the gov of the state in question specifically allows the federal govt to disperse active duty troops in their state. Remember the Natl Guard does not work for the feds, they work for the govs. This goes way back to the founding of the nation where the states had their own miltia and they wanted to protect states rights and not give the fed govt a blank check to rule over them.

/quote]

yup !

See: Posse Comitatus Act


This, has been around since the 1800's. Wiki is your friend.


Non Sibi Sed Patriae -- "Not for self, but for country."

Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: lakeforkfisherman] #13683791 08/28/20 08:23 PM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 6,854
V-Bottom Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 6,854
Civil War II ..coming to a theater near you.


Texas Anglers Recognition Program
TPWD Official Weigh Station,77563
Coastal Bend Weigh Team, Cert. Weigh Master
USMC66'- www.troutsupport.com




Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: donothin] #13683812 08/28/20 08:39 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,672
Tiltman Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,672
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Yeah, we need more 17 yo kids with long guns out supporting the police.


Active duty military is a lot different than that kid. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that? Let me guess, you never served right? I'm betting "donothin" isn't just a user name but a way of life for you.

Sorry, you are wrong about me. And yes, i know that active duty military is a lot different than a kid and never implied otherwise. But, I also sending armed servicemen in against citizens is a very dangerous thing to do and smacks of Marxism, Nazism or some other kind of authoritarian kind of government. You have absolutely no business teaching young kids. You may have been in the military, but you are clueless to the parameters that are in place.



serious question , assuming you were to acknowledge the need to stop the aggressive and violent rioters , who should be the heavy hand ?

Police ?
Guard ?
Citizens with opposing viewpoints ?

Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: Tiltman] #13683836 08/28/20 09:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,391
B
Bentman63 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,391
Originally Posted by Tiltman
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Yeah, we need more 17 yo kids with long guns out supporting the police.


Active duty military is a lot different than that kid. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that? Let me guess, you never served right? I'm betting "donothin" isn't just a user name but a way of life for you.

Sorry, you are wrong about me. And yes, i know that active duty military is a lot different than a kid and never implied otherwise. But, I also sending armed servicemen in against citizens is a very dangerous thing to do and smacks of Marxism, Nazism or some other kind of authoritarian kind of government. You have absolutely no business teaching young kids. You may have been in the military, but you are clueless to the parameters that are in place.



serious question , assuming you were to acknowledge the need to stop the aggressive and violent rioters , who should be the heavy hand ?

Police ?
Guard ?
Citizens with opposing viewpoints ?



FS,DN and TG should go a peace tour and stop the riots..


[Linked Image]
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: lakeforkfisherman] #13683849 08/28/20 09:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,882
U
uncle_bagster Online Content
TFF Team Angler
Online Content
TFF Team Angler
U
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,882
Posse Comitatus doesn't apply to the Marines unless the law has been changed in the past few years.

Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: Indianation65] #13684003 08/28/20 11:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,312
G
GarySHO Offline
Ice Ice Baby
Offline
Ice Ice Baby
G
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,312
Originally Posted by Indianation65
I'm sure it's already been stated, democratic mayors and governors would rather see their cities burn than ask for help.

If this nonsense keeps happening and we have a different President (unlikely) those demos will ask for help quickly!

...------

They don't want help, they want money. They think if they let half the city burn that they will get money thrown at them.


[Linked Image]
A vote is like a rifle; its usefulness depends upon the character of the user- Theodore Roosevelt

Broken Bow Lake Fishing Guide

2020 Caymas CX 20 PRO and 250 SHO
Hochatownfishingguide.com
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: Flags] #13684082 08/29/20 01:25 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,932
donothin Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,932
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Yeah, we need more 17 yo kids with long guns out supporting the police.


Active duty military is a lot different than that kid. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that? Let me guess, you never served right? I'm betting "donothin" isn't just a user name but a way of life for you.

Sorry, you are wrong about me. And yes, i know that active duty military is a lot different than a kid and never implied otherwise.
Actually you did. When someone mentions sending troops you equated the troops with that kid. Your idiotic implication is plainly visible.

But, I also sending armed servicemen in against citizens is a very dangerous thing to do and smacks of Marxism, Nazism or some other kind of authoritarian kind of government.
No it isn't. The Constitution has a provision for it if the gov of a state officially requests help. And in this case, nobody has sent out armed servicemen not have they officially suggested it. The OP is asking a question. Show me where trump has said he is sending active duty troops in. Only he can authorize that and he has not said he is going to do it. Govs can mobilize the Natl Guard within their own states and those are not considered active duty troops.

You have absolutely no business teaching young kids.
Why? Because I will teach them what the Constitution says and means? Because I teach them to think for themselves? Because I teach them that they can make up their own minds? I am exactly what they need teaching kids because I offer a different viewpoint than the LIB agenda.I'm going to bet you don't even have any kids.

You may have been in the military, but you are clueless to the parameters that are in place.
Actually because I was in the military I fully understand the parameters in place. If you bother looking at the post I made on this thread about the parameters, I pretty well covered them. Since you don't seem to be intelligent enough to actually see what I wrote, I'll help you. This is on the first page of comments and is 2nd to the bottom:
Quote
Because it is illegal to do so unless the gov of the state in question specifically allows the federal govt to disperse active duty troops in their state. Remember the Natl Guard does not work for the feds, they work for the govs. This goes way back to the founding of the nation where the states had their own miltia and they wanted to protect states rights and not give the fed govt a blank check to rule over them.


So tell me Genius, where am I wrong?


You're really not very bright are you? I'll take you rant above as an admission that you never served and have never done anything. Why don't you do us all a favor and go play in traffic?


You are totally out of it. I will not argue with you as you seem unstable. Would suggest some counseling at a minimum.

Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: donothin] #13684089 08/29/20 01:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,321
F
Flags Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
F
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,321
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
Originally Posted by donothin
Originally Posted by Flags
[quote=donothin]Yeah, we need more 17 yo kids with long guns out supporting the police.


Active duty military is a lot different than that kid. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that? Let me guess, you never served right? I'm betting "donothin" isn't just a user name but a way of life for you.

Sorry, you are wrong about me. And yes, i know that active duty military is a lot different than a kid and never implied otherwise.
Actually you did. When someone mentions sending troops you equated the troops with that kid. Your idiotic implication is plainly visible.

But, I also sending armed servicemen in against citizens is a very dangerous thing to do and smacks of Marxism, Nazism or some other kind of authoritarian kind of government.
No it isn't. The Constitution has a provision for it if the gov of a state officially requests help. And in this case, nobody has sent out armed servicemen not have they officially suggested it. The OP is asking a question. Show me where trump has said he is sending active duty troops in. Only he can authorize that and he has not said he is going to do it. Govs can mobilize the Natl Guard within their own states and those are not considered active duty troops.

You have absolutely no business teaching young kids.
Why? Because I will teach them what the Constitution says and means? Because I teach them to think for themselves? Because I teach them that they can make up their own minds? I am exactly what they need teaching kids because I offer a different viewpoint than the LIB agenda.I'm going to bet you don't even have any kids.

You may have been in the military, but you are clueless to the parameters that are in place.
Actually because I was in the military I fully understand the parameters in place. If you bother looking at the post I made on this thread about the parameters, I pretty well covered them. Since you don't seem to be intelligent enough to actually see what I wrote, I'll help you. This is on the first page of comments and is 2nd to the bottom:
Quote
Because it is illegal to do so unless the gov of the state in question specifically allows the federal govt to disperse active duty troops in their state. Remember the Natl Guard does not work for the feds, they work for the govs. This goes way back to the founding of the nation where the states had their own miltia and they wanted to protect states rights and not give the fed govt a blank check to rule over them.


So tell me Genius, where am I wrong?


You're really not very bright are you? I'll take you rant above as an admission that you never served and have never done anything. Why don't you do us all a favor and go play in traffic?


Quote
You are totally out of it. I will not argue with you as you seem unstable. Would suggest some counseling at a minimum.


Translation: You cannot refute nor can you defend. Typical idiotic LIB ploy. You lose.

Last edited by Flags; 08/29/20 01:35 AM.

Retired Navy Chief Signalman
NJROTC Instructor Los Fresnos High School
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: donothin] #13684104 08/29/20 01:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 38,967
chickenman Offline
1:28
Offline
1:28
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 38,967
Replies with opinions that differ from a few others during an online discussion = unstable

Got it roflmao

Side note, pretty sure you don't deploy Marxist tactics on Marxist members to defeat a Marxism.


[Linked Image]
Re: Why not call in the Marines? [Re: chickenman] #13684156 08/29/20 02:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,338
S
steveiam Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,338
Originally Posted by chickenman
Replies with opinions that differ from a few others during an online discussion = unstable

Got it roflmao

Side note, pretty sure you don't deploy Marxist tactics on Marxist members to defeat a Marxism.

He has used that unstable carp with me before too-
It’s his go to when he doesn’t like being called out-

Oh, AND he wished a recession on our country because “orange man bad“.
So there is that-

Last edited by steveiam; 08/29/20 02:55 AM.

What has happed to you does not define who you are-

HOW you react to what happens to you DOES!
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3