Forums59
Topics1,057,212
Posts14,281,185
Members144,604
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: Frank the Tank]
#13558460
05/15/20 06:08 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,573
Finesse EMPEROR/ Dropshot King
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,573 |
Invizx is WAY more supple and smooth than red label. But don't get me wrong red label gets the job done but don't put it on a spinning reel lol watched $15 blow up in my face in two cast.
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: Frank the Tank]
#13558551
05/15/20 11:54 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 563
texasAUtiger
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 563 |
I found Red Label horrific. I use Inviz-x all the time on baitcasters for moving baits and am very pleased.
Ranger z21 Mercury 250 ProXS
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: Frank the Tank]
#13558554
05/15/20 11:57 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 45,018
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 45,018 |
Flouro sucks out loud, throw some big game on.
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: WAWI]
#13558571
05/15/20 12:10 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 57,753
RayBob
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 57,753 |
Flouro sucks out loud, throw some big game on. I still use a fair share of BG and have used it for 30 years.
Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it !
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: Frank the Tank]
#13558578
05/15/20 12:27 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 563
texasAUtiger
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 563 |
I much prefer the sensitivity and smaller diameter of flouro for my crankbaits. Your mileage may vary of course.
Ranger z21 Mercury 250 ProXS
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: WAWI]
#13558927
05/15/20 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,573
Finesse EMPEROR/ Dropshot King
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,573 |
Flouro sucks out loud, throw some big game on. I still use BG for just about everything but spinning reels and whatever I canโt afford to put flouro on lol BG has never let me down. 12lb clear or 15lb green.
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: RayBob]
#13558942
05/15/20 04:29 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 428
Basscat8263
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 428 |
Flouro sucks out loud, throw some big game on. I still use a fair share of BG and have used it for 30 years. Man, I tend to agree about fluoro sucking. I'm always threatening to go back to BG. But I love the lack of stretch, invisibility and sensitivity that fluoro offers.
Tony
|
|
Re: Invizx vs. red label
[Re: Frank the Tank]
#13559059
05/15/20 06:17 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 79
Stephen M Fatherree
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 79 |
WOW... not even close. Invizx is WAY more supple and smooth than red label. It's amazing. I had forgotten how much better it is. Agreed, Red Label has to be one of if not the worst preforming fluorocarbon line I have ever used in my entire life. I bought a few spools years ago and they were extremely disappointing. Perhaps I got a bad batch that was stored incorrectly, but I've never had a bad batch of InvizX. Spending some extra money on quality line will allow you to keep it on your reels for many more months without ever needing to change it out. Seaguar Tatsu and Sunline Sniper are well worth the money, they are some of my favorites in the fluorocarbon line category. Just do not break off snagged lures by pulling on your line as this does significant damage to your line, sadly far to many recreational anglers and even some "professional" guides/fisherman continue to do this. NEVER do this, especially if you've invested in high quality line!
Respectfully,
Stephen Fatherree
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek ๐, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|