Judge Dan agrees all that was fake AF.

If she is upset I think its about the fact she might do time. She is sad for herself not the man she murdered or his family and friends.

But as Judge, I am impartial. Just saying....

Here's an analogy, a weak one but an analogy. Yesterday I was hitting into a green that was around the corner from some trees. I could see the bottom half of the green but not the flag. I hit a hook around the corner, the ball hit the side of the green and kicked left but I couldn't see where it landed. My partner ask where my ball was, I said not sure because I didn't see where it stopped. There were 3 balls on the green and I knew none were mine. As we rounded the corner he said there it is on your left. I grabbed a wedge and chipped on the green. When I bent over to mark the ball I realized it wasn't my ball because I mark my ball. Looked a little farther up and there was my ball settle down in some grass. Too late, I got myself a 2 stroke penalty for hitting the wrong ball. Guyger gets a penalty for being in the wrong apartment. The question is will it be a 2 stroke penalty. I could have taken the time legally to identify my ball to make sure it was mine, Guyger had no time in her mind to identify her apartment, there was a huge black man walking toward her. Will the jury take that into consideration ? No idea. Will Guyger live with this the rest of her life ? You betcha. She has as they say a hard row to hoe the rest of her life. Sorry for her, her family, the deceased and his family. No winners to be found.

Guyger had no time in her mind to identify her apartment, there was a huge black man walking toward her.

I feel much worse for the innocent man whose life was taken from him, and the family and friends who he was taken from.

Nuff said.

I guarantee if you went through a high level shoot - don't shoot simulator 90% of you would fail miserably.....you're continually ignoring what the law says because "you feel, or you think" it should be this or that. The law is the law, period. You don't get to ignore it because it's not going to punish her enough.

Would we have to walk into a wrong apartment in this simulator? If she doesn’t walk into the wrong apartment a person wouldn’t be dead. She is 100% liable and deserves 100% of the consequence

Judge Dan also thinks we need to consider WHY we put people in jail.

Is it REHABILITATE them? We fail at that miserably if that is the point. Its a joke actually. Does Guyger need rehabilitation anyways? No.

Is it to PROTECT society from the perpetrator? I dont feel she is a risk at all to anyone. She wont do this again I am sure of it. Best I can tell she spent her life helping people (and helping herself to their husbands, but I digress).

Is it PUNISH the perpetrator? If so then lets throw her in jail. So lets punish her. Give her 20 years to think about the innocent man she killed.

So Judge Dan says yes, lets do this. GUILTY. But be sure you know why you want that. It is to punish so we feel better. So her and her family suffer like the victim did as he lay dying on his living room floor...guilty of nothing but not closing his door well enough....or standing up when someone busts in with a gun on him. So she suffers like his family does everyday.

Lets not fool ourselves here, its not justice we are after. This was a sick accident of fate. There cannot be justice here. But there can be vengeance...make no mistake that is what this is all about.

I am sad to say it because we makes me less of a fully realized human being, lest Christ like and more like a devil, but fact is Judge Dan supports this payback.

The Judge recognizes the great Junebens point. Would we walk into the wrong apartment?

In the simulator would we also not follow our Police training and protocol of backing up to a safe place and calling for back up to assist or in the simulator do we bust in and start shooting at anything that moves like little Amber did?

Follow up question- do we have to/ get to look at D pics during the simulator?

Another key “purpose for punishment” that you failed to mention is...punishment can serve as a deterrent to others.

Judge Dan also thinks we need to consider WHY we put people in jail.

Is it REHABILITATE them? We fail at that miserably if that is the point. Its a joke actually. Does Guyger need rehabilitation anyways? No.

Is it to PROTECT society from the perpetrator? I dont feel she is a risk at all to anyone. She wont do this again I am sure of it. Best I can tell she spent her life helping people (and helping herself to their husbands, but I digress).

Is it PUNISH the perpetrator? If so then lets throw her in jail. So lets punish her. Give her 20 years to think about the innocent man she killed.

So Judge Dan says yes, lets do this. GUILTY. But be sure you know why you want that. It is to punish so we feel better. So her and her family suffer like the victim did as he lay dying on his living room floor...guilty of nothing but not closing his door well enough....or standing up when someone busts in with a gun on him. So she suffers like his family does everyday.

Lets not fool ourselves here, its not justice we are after. This was a sick accident of fate. There cannot be justice here. But there can be vengeance...make no mistake that is what this is all about.

I am sad to say it because we makes me less of a fully realized human being, lest Christ like and more like a devil, but fact is Judge Dan supports this payback.

Would we have to walk into a wrong apartment in this simulator? If she doesn’t walk into the wrong apartment a person wouldn’t be dead. She is 100% liable and deserves 100% of the consequence

Yeah well I am a Judge! I am the law not you so simmer down! Your GD dense [censored] is in contempt!