Forums59
Topics1,052,282
Posts14,193,305
Members144,484
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#14995143
02/21/24 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175
patriot07
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175 |
My ecodiesel was a 2016 model. Never missed a beat or broke down one time. Towed my camper to smoky mountains, yellowstone, etc. Best truck I ever owned until this Ford F-250
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. - Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#14996553
02/22/24 03:58 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 276
sticknstring
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 276 |
I'm still driving mine. It's all stock, 2018, I got 120,000 on it. No issues yet. I pull my boat and several small trailers with it regularly. It primarily has highway miles on it. My brother bought a 2023 and he loves it. Time will tell
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: raptor]
#15014204
03/11/24 08:19 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422 |
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#15014336
03/11/24 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
Duke 22
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue.
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: Duke 22]
#15014497
03/12/24 02:05 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,085 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. All that and still discontinued it
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: tmd11111]
#15014499
03/12/24 02:10 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
Duke 22
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. All that and still discontinued it You can thank CARB, CAFE, and the democrats as a whole for ruining diesel engines as we once knew them.
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: raptor]
#15014599
03/12/24 04:48 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,899
Mckinneycrappiecatcher
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,899 |
I’m learning that for the most part reliability comes down to maintenance. The manufacturer doesn’t want your engine and transmission to go 200k+. Whatever they say the oil change interval is, cut it in half. Change transmission, diffs, and transfer case every 30k miles and you’ll probably have a good, reliable truck. Goes for most truck manufacturers. Preventative maintenance is cheap and it’s your friend.
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: Duke 22]
#15027446
03/26/24 02:02 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. LOL there's a new engine failure posted every other day here, gen 2 failure posted today https://www.ram1500diesel.com/forums/ram-1500-diesel-general-discussion.6/
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#15027472
03/26/24 02:38 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
Duke 22
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. LOL there's a new engine failure posted every other day here, gen 2 failure posted today https://www.ram1500diesel.com/forums/ram-1500-diesel-general-discussion.6/Cool, still not a Gen 3...
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: Duke 22]
#15027531
03/26/24 04:26 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. LOL there's a new engine failure posted every other day here, gen 2 failure posted today https://www.ram1500diesel.com/forums/ram-1500-diesel-general-discussion.6/Cool, still not a Gen 3... And it still got discontinued didn't it...
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#15027544
03/26/24 07:51 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374
Duke 22
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,374 |
Y'all are beating a dead horse. That link is for the gen 1 Ecodiesel that was a disaster. Since then they have widened and beefed up the bearings on the bottom end and added filets to the crank. Since this has happened I don't know of any lower end failures. Not to say they haven't had one but certainly not enough to become even a small issue. LOL there's a new engine failure posted every other day here, gen 2 failure posted today https://www.ram1500diesel.com/forums/ram-1500-diesel-general-discussion.6/Cool, still not a Gen 3... And it still got discontinued didn't it... Show me on the doll where RAM hurt you...
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: raptor]
#15027652
03/26/24 12:19 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175
patriot07
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175 |
Gen 1 ecodiesel was hardly a disaster. I had one and was one of the best vehicles I ever had - just stupidly got a 2wd and got stuck several times and it was the last 2wd I ever owned (or will own). But the engine was great - gas mileage was stupid and it hauled a 28' travel trailer all over the country.
They definitely had some bearing issues on the lower end, but the failure rate was very low and nearly always covered by warranty.
I'm not super surprised they nixed the engine altogether. I never saw a ton of them on the road - modern emissions make diesels too much of a risk unless you're in the HD category.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. - Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: patriot07]
#15027889
03/26/24 04:04 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422 |
Gen 1 ecodiesel was hardly a disaster. I had one and was one of the best vehicles I ever had - just stupidly got a 2wd and got stuck several times and it was the last 2wd I ever owned (or will own). But the engine was great - gas mileage was stupid and it hauled a 28' travel trailer all over the country.
They definitely had some bearing issues on the lower end, but the failure rate was very low and nearly always covered by warranty.
I'm not super surprised they nixed the engine altogether. I never saw a ton of them on the road - modern emissions make diesels too much of a risk unless you're in the HD category. Actually it was, you won the lotto with yours. The the lower bearing failure is speculated to be >10% across all gen1 & 2 motor fleet, that is insanely high for an auto manufacturer today, haven't heard info on failures on the gen3's but I think that engine fixed lots of the earlier problems. This video opened some eyes
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: SC-001]
#15028579
03/27/24 04:23 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175
patriot07
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,175 |
Gen 1 ecodiesel was hardly a disaster. I had one and was one of the best vehicles I ever had - just stupidly got a 2wd and got stuck several times and it was the last 2wd I ever owned (or will own). But the engine was great - gas mileage was stupid and it hauled a 28' travel trailer all over the country.
They definitely had some bearing issues on the lower end, but the failure rate was very low and nearly always covered by warranty.
I'm not super surprised they nixed the engine altogether. I never saw a ton of them on the road - modern emissions make diesels too much of a risk unless you're in the HD category. Actually it was, you won the lotto with yours. The the lower bearing failure is speculated to be >10% across all gen1 & 2 motor fleet, that is insanely high for an auto manufacturer today, haven't heard info on failures on the gen3's but I think that engine fixed lots of the earlier problems. This video opened some eyes "Speculated" Meaning nobody has any real data. It also means I didn't win the lotto. My buddy (who is on this forum) has a FIL who has one with well over 100k miles and zero issues. redchevy has one with no issues. Lots of folks on the ram ecodiesel forum I was one had them with 300k+ with no issues. Just for your awareness - Failure rate of the CP4 fuel pump (that was used in all 3 major HD diesel brands between 2015 to current production) is around 7% documented, so 10% speculated failure rate on ED bearings isn't "insanely high". Let's pull back a bit on the hyperbole and push forward on data and actual true information.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. - Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
Re: Ram 1500 ecodiesel
[Re: raptor]
#15032122
03/31/24 01:31 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,422 |
LO F'in L, lets see how many people you get to buy a half ton with a 3.5K upcharge over the gasser and let them know 10% of the product sold is going to spin a lower bearing without warning at any time. I promise you if the consumer knew what we know now almost no one would have bought this engine.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|