Is age or mileage more important when buying used cars?

Re: Is age or mileage more important when buying used cars? [Re: patriot07] #12449344 10/02/17 12:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2016 Posts: 2,110 Pearland, TX D dk2429 Extreme Angler
dk2429 Extreme Angler D Joined: Mar 2016 Posts: 2,110 Pearland, TX	Originally Posted By: patriot07 160k miles. Went years fixing nothing. Within the last year of ownership, I had to replace shocks, a window motor, and the headliner started falling down up front. It was just time. Yeah, I can agree on that. Same thing in my '06 Dmax. None of the issues you listed, but there are some cosmetic things that could use attention. Nothing major, just stupid simple stuff. Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax

Re: Is age or mileage more important when buying used cars? [Re: slipbobber] #12470340 10/18/17 07:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,777 Joshua, TX C CWCW Extreme Angler
CWCW Extreme Angler C Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,777 Joshua, TX	I think condition of the vehicle means more than mileage but in any situation as stated above, maintenance is the most important. Vehicles of today and for the past 5 years ago or more are/were built to last 250k before major overhaul. I would take a well maintained 5 year old 100k vehicle over a 10 year old 50k mile vehicle any day. Today's vehicles contain a lot of rubber and plastics that begin to crack and dry rot over time, and they have more electronics which time is tough on. 2009 Tracker PT 170 TX Mercury 50hp Lowrance X125 Lowrance X50 Motorguide 46 TM

Page 2 of 2

Hop To