Forums59
Topics1,057,523
Posts14,286,041
Members144,609
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
#11746373
07/28/16 02:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,123
JC Skeeter
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,123 |
I understand that everyone has their favorites or the line they prefer, but I wanted to see what some of you look for or expect from fluorocarbon line. Because to me, just like with anything else, they are not created equal. I prefer gamma fluorocarbon, likely one of the most expensive on the market, but I have tried Berkley and Sunline and both resulted in more break offs than I am used to. Could have just been me, but I have not had that issue with gamma so I just stick with what I know.
I just purchased several of the new lews rods and reels so I was wondering if anyone has tried the lews apt fluorocarbon. I did a check and noticed that the diameter size is different for several brands, like for instance:
Gamma 12# is (.013" x .33mm) and Lews 12# is (.012" x .305mm) but the Lews 14# is (.013" x .33mm)
Gamma 20# is (.017" x .43mm) and Lews is the same
So do you guys look at that at all, or just typically buy what you know and/or are used to?
Last edited by JasonC; 07/28/16 02:20 PM.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746430
07/28/16 02:43 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 337
JoeyC
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 337 |
I used seaguar invizx for the longest time. It was soft and super easy to cast. Within the last year or so I had a ton of break offs on a couple of trips and lost some good fish. I switched to sunline sniper and have not had any issues since then. I don't pay attention to the diameter usually but just the #
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746439
07/28/16 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772
Outdoordude
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772 |
I'm picky about lines too, probably more so than necessary. One of the students in the college club I run set up a partnership with Hi-Seas line; a pretty small company with a small footprint and following. I reluctantly tried some of their stuff and it opened my eyes a bit, that there actually is something other than Seaguar InvizX, and that pretty much each brand excels at something that another brand might not. The Hi-Seas fluoro stretches less, is more sensitive and is more abrasion resistant than Seaguar InvizX making it a great Texas rig or jig line. However, Seaguar InvizX stretches a little more, it's thinner, and a little easier to cast than Hi-Seas making it a great crankbait line.
I did research line diameters and reviews quite a bit before trying Hi-Seas, and was hesitant because of the thicker diameter. But, now I have found an even stronger line that I use for pitching around cover while still using my long-time favorite Seaguar InvizX for everything else. My take-away from this experience is that trying other brands is a good idea, even if they don't measure the same on paper as what you're used to.
Scott Jones
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JoeyC]
#11746454
07/28/16 02:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 158
G_Mize93
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 158 |
I have always been a fan of Seaguar Red Label, as well as the InvizX. However I started having the same problems with every single spool I purchased, within the last six months period, where I was having multiple line breaks from inside my spools to main line. All of which had no signs of abrasion issues. Since then, I have changed to Bass Pro's stuff, and have been even more satisfied then before! It is slightly thicker in diameter in comparison to equal poundage, but the strength and abrasion resistance is bar non. 
"Many people go fishing their whole lives without knowing that it is not fishing that they are after." -Henry David Thoreau
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746473
07/28/16 03:08 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,764
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,764 |
I understand that everyone has their favorites or the line they prefer, but I wanted to see what some of you look for or expect from fluorocarbon line. Because to me, just like with anything else, they are not created equal. I prefer gamma fluorocarbon, likely one of the most expensive on the market, but I have tried Berkley and Sunline and both resulted in more break offs than I am used to. Could have just been me, but I have not had that issue with gamma so I just stick with what I know.
I just purchased several of the new lews rods and reels so I was wondering if anyone has tried the lews apt fluorocarbon. I did a check and noticed that the diameter size is different for several brands, like for instance:
Gamma 12# is (.013" x .33mm) and Lews 12# is (.012" x .305mm) but the Lews 14# is (.013" x .33mm)
Gamma 20# is (.017" x .43mm) and Lews is the same
So do you guys look at that at all, or just typically buy what you know and/or are used to? Interesting 411 for sure. I pay attention to the diameters. I think it is a numbers game to see who can have the "strongest" line for it's pound test. I would expect Sunline 12# to be very strong, as the diameter of it is bigger than InvizX at .011. Berkley 100% Flo is even thicker at .013. My money says that if I created a new brand of 12# Flo that had a diameter of .015 it would be even stronger than Sunline & Berkley. See what I mean? I like InvizX AND Berkley 100% but when I want the strongest, I use Berkely 100%. I think InvizX is smoother and casts better than Berkley but it is not as strong IMO. It makes sense why when you look at the diameters. The difference between the two is noticeable. It is a balancing act to make a line that is strong, abrasion resistant, soft, limp, castable, easy to manage. It seems like the softer and more limp the line is, the less abrasion resistant it is and Vice Versa.
Last edited by Ken A.; 07/28/16 03:11 PM.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746474
07/28/16 03:08 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 215
SFAJACKS44
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 215 |
Have been an Invizx guy for a while. Same issue as above. Have had more break offs this past summer than the last 2-3 years combined. My routine and technique has not changed... Line must have. Glad I'm not the only one. Thought I was just having one of those bad luck runs. Testing different lines right now.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways with a fishing rod in one hand, 10# LMB in the other, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and yelling "Wow! What a Ride!
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746481
07/28/16 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,135
Cass Caldwell
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,135 |
I have absolute confidence in Seaguar Invizx. It's softer than most, very strong and sensitive. I haven't experienced the problems mentioned above and hope I don't, because I love it.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746487
07/28/16 03:14 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,764
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,764 |
Has anyone tried the new Seaguar Flipping line?
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746490
07/28/16 03:16 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,474
MagFluker
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,474 |
Buy the 1000 yard spools of invisx and thank me later. Save money and I have not had any breakoffs in these spools like some have mentioned.
Kyle in NC
PB 11.1
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746503
07/28/16 03:22 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,325
CCTX
mapquest
|
mapquest
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45,325 |
Haven't had much trouble with Red Label or Invisx. This year, with all the stained water, I've been using more Pline CXX in 8lb test for finesse and 17lb for trig/flipping and haven't noticed a difference in bite frequency.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746549
07/28/16 03:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 422
Connor S
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 422 |
I say we fish 5 days a week and work 2.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746554
07/28/16 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 345
McKinneyMike
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 345 |
InvisX or Sniper for me these days
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746616
07/28/16 04:22 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,123
JC Skeeter
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,123 |
For those who are saying InvisX, even those that have had some break offs with them, what is the typical lb test you are using? 20lb?
Also, as some have mentioned, do you use certain lines or lb test for certain methods? Such as flipping, pitching, cranking, Carolina rig etc?
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746641
07/28/16 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,601
GROD
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,601 |
I've used red label for years now and have never had an issue. For the price point of 10.99 a spool it can't be beat.
|
|
Re: Your go to Fluorocarbon Line
[Re: JC Skeeter]
#11746693
07/28/16 05:09 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,511
Slade
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,511 |
Invisix all the way for me. I have also used the Abrasix quite a bit with no issues. I got a pool of sunline sniper but didn't care for it, maybe its just me
PB 10.58 Joe Pool
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|