texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
tdollins, billyj293, BX19gti, Likesfishing, db89
119201 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 119,890
Bigbob_FTW 95,566
John175☮ 85,945
Pilothawk 83,279
Bob Davis 82,785
Mark Perry 72,533
Derek 🐝 68,325
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,348
Posts13,963,238
Members144,201
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514431 03/31/16 09:37 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 337
D
danwill12 Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
D
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 337
swalker9513, I'll give you credit, your 1st sentence rang true. After that it was like a busted hat band. Dan

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514454 03/31/16 09:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,880
S
swalker9513 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,880
cool I really have no idea what that means, but I may have to steal it.



Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514468 03/31/16 09:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Ken A. Online Content
Groovy
Online Content
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
I have had people tell me that the fluoro kinks and loops up real bad and doesn't stay straight. I was considering trying some but now not sure. Is this a big issue or should I keep mono? I was planning on using it for worms and jigs. My rods have the micro eyes and I was looking at 12 lb line. They also mentioned line conditioner? What the heck is that? I am not sure that I want to use a string that I have to pamper to keep it from kinking up.
Thanks


Buy a spool of Seaguar Invizx and give it a try. Yes, it kinks up a little worse than mono but it does allow you to feel whats going on with the bait better. I think the benefits are worth the trade-offs. I don't use line conditioner. Some guys swear by it but when I feel like it is starting to kink up more than it should I just strip it off and spool up some new line.

You probably already know this trick but I never strip off all my old line. I strip about half then tie onto the old line with the new. That way you only need about 50 yards or so to fill your reel. 50 yards is a long cast.



Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514471 03/31/16 09:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Ken A. Online Content
Groovy
Online Content
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Also don't use fluoro for topwaters. It sinks and messes up the action on topwater baits.



Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: swalker9513] #11514479 03/31/16 09:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
C
Cmack Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: swalker9513
LOTS of misinformation about fluorocarbon float around the TFF. It has it's place, but unless you are cashing checks and can afford to replace your line often, it's a waste of money. If you are just fishing for fun, why bother with it. It's just too fickle. If you are tournament fishing and hoping to cash checks, better learn how/when to use it. It's not good for all situations, but definitely has it's place.

But, at the end of the day, it's your money. Buy some quality line. Give it a try. You may like it.


I concur with your opinion on florocarbon. The information floating around the TFF is pretty much in direct opposition to the stretch,abrasion and strength tests done over at Tackle Tour.


Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514492 03/31/16 10:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,120
B
Brad R Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,120
It is inexpensive for short leaders: using about 6' so 2 or 3 yards at a time, a spool of Seaguar Invizx will last a very long time.

I was always a mono guy, started fishing again when I retired and I went to a braid main line and fluoro leader for finesse applications and I couldn't believe how much more I could feel as I dragged a T-Rig or a drop shot across the bottom. Pretty cool!

This, too, after really liking the modern monofilaments, like Sufix Elite, compared to the monofilaments I used as a kid.

I'd give it a go at least once, then revert to mono if you don't see or feel the advantage. No shame in that.

Hey! And, some of the new co-polymers might be worth a try, too.

Brad

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514493 03/31/16 10:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 31
G
Gogo3417 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 31
Fluorocarbon line is the equivalent of taking a 10 month old baby fishing with you. Way too much to worry about besides catching a fish..

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514539 03/31/16 10:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,578
U
UTDmiller Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
U
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,578
Never have issues with Fluoro and that is basically all i throw. To each his own though, give it a try and if you dont like it switch back.

Last edited by UTDmiller; 03/31/16 10:33 PM.

John Miller
Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11514571 03/31/16 10:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,885
0
04champ Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
0
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,885
what kind of flouro are y'all using that gives you problems? I have never had an issue with kinking or fluffing or backlashing with Invisx

I've never even used line conditioner

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: Ken A.] #11514573 03/31/16 10:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,885
0
04champ Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
0
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,885
Originally Posted By: Ken A.
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
I have had people tell me that the fluoro kinks and loops up real bad and doesn't stay straight. I was considering trying some but now not sure. Is this a big issue or should I keep mono? I was planning on using it for worms and jigs. My rods have the micro eyes and I was looking at 12 lb line. They also mentioned line conditioner? What the heck is that? I am not sure that I want to use a string that I have to pamper to keep it from kinking up.
Thanks


Buy a spool of Seaguar Invizx and give it a try. Yes, it kinks up a little worse than mono but it does allow you to feel whats going on with the bait better. I think the benefits are worth the trade-offs. I don't use line conditioner. Some guys swear by it but when I feel like it is starting to kink up more than it should I just strip it off and spool up some new line.

You probably already know this trick but I never strip off all my old line. I strip about half then tie onto the old line with the new. That way you only need about 50 yards or so to fill your reel. 50 yards is a long cast.


I back with cheap mono and put about 75 yards of flouro on at a time

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: 04champ] #11514618 03/31/16 11:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,753
Outdoordude Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,753
Originally Posted By: 04champ
what kind of flouro are y'all using that gives you problems? I have never had an issue with kinking or fluffing or backlashing with Invisx

I've never even used line conditioner


I don't get it either. My girlfriend fishes twice a year and can cast fluoro only backlashing once or twice every 30 minutes or so. Some of you guys make it sound like fluoro is the stretchiest, yet somehow at the same time, coiliest garbage ever created to make people waste money.

And, needs to be replaced often? Give me a break, I have 12lb InvisX that has been on 4 rods that get used every weekend that is over a year old; they only get re-spooled when the mainline gets too short for a long cast from re-tying.


Scott Jones
Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11515090 04/01/16 02:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,466
R
RayBob Online Content
Super Freak
Online Content
Super Freak
R
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,466
According to what I've read fluoro is not degraded appreciably by UV and absorbs no liquids (water, chemicals) thus I don't change line near as often. Line conditioner helps lub it maybe (I use it) but it does not soften it or actually make it more supple like it does my nylon mono. I think it does backlash a bit worse. Having said that I like it. I've had no issues with knots (even palomar), it has shown itself to be pretty tough, and I find it more sensitive. Yeah that is all anecdotal. Maybe having thrown Trilene Big Game for 25 years prepared me to throw a stiffer mono. Still use my BG on topwater and SB applications but when fishing plastics I'm a fluoro guy. I'll use it for cranking too if I'm trying to get a bit more depth.

I use InvisX, mostly 12# and 15# with a couple of reels spooled in 20#. I also use some Berkley 100% and find it almost as good as the Seagar.


Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it.

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: RayBob] #11515455 04/01/16 11:37 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,756
Huckleberry Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,756
Originally Posted By: RayBob
According to what I've read fluoro is not degraded appreciably by UV and absorbs no liquids (water, chemicals) thus I don't change line near as often. Line conditioner helps lub it maybe (I use it) but it does not soften it or actually make it more supple like it does my nylon mono. I think it does backlash a bit worse. Having said that I like it. I've had no issues with knots (even palomar), it has shown itself to be pretty tough, and I find it more sensitive. Yeah that is all anecdotal. Maybe having thrown Trilene Big Game for 25 years prepared me to throw a stiffer mono. Still use my BG on topwater and SB applications but when fishing plastics I'm a fluoro guy. I'll use it for cranking too if I'm trying to get a bit more depth.

I use InvisX, mostly 12# and 15# with a couple of reels spooled in 20#. I also use some Berkley 100% and find it almost as good as the Seagar.


Fluoro does not give you more depth with a crankbait

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: TxRanger1] #11515495 04/01/16 12:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 561
Y
YAKaddict Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Y
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 561
Make America great again by buying big game...everyone who likes fluoro I will trade you 2 spools of big game for 2 spools of sniper fc but must be somewhere at least near mckinney

Re: Question on Fluro or Mono [Re: Huckleberry] #11515503 04/01/16 12:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Ken A. Online Content
Groovy
Online Content
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,522
Originally Posted By: Huckleberry
Originally Posted By: RayBob
According to what I've read fluoro is not degraded appreciably by UV and absorbs no liquids (water, chemicals) thus I don't change line near as often. Line conditioner helps lub it maybe (I use it) but it does not soften it or actually make it more supple like it does my nylon mono. I think it does backlash a bit worse. Having said that I like it. I've had no issues with knots (even palomar), it has shown itself to be pretty tough, and I find it more sensitive. Yeah that is all anecdotal. Maybe having thrown Trilene Big Game for 25 years prepared me to throw a stiffer mono. Still use my BG on topwater and SB applications but when fishing plastics I'm a fluoro guy. I'll use it for cranking too if I'm trying to get a bit more depth.

I use InvisX, mostly 12# and 15# with a couple of reels spooled in 20#. I also use some Berkley 100% and find it almost as good as the Seagar.


Fluoro does not give you more depth with a crankbait


This guy will argue with a Stop sign. It is a proven fact that fluoro will give you more depth on a crankbait. Those of us that long-line with it know this and will use it to get a 6XD down to 30 feet. Fluro sinks like a rock. Mono suspends and braid floats.

Last edited by Ken A.; 04/01/16 12:08 PM.


Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3