texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
MilesA, YellaCat91, JessieM, Joey Cortez, B-Razorback
119208 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 119,929
Bigbob_FTW 95,666
John175☮ 85,950
Pilothawk 83,281
Bob Davis 82,944
Mark Perry 72,554
Derek 🐝 68,327
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,593
Posts13,967,215
Members144,208
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11438807 02/25/16 06:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
T
TxRanger1 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
I use the lead because it is softer and when a fish bites, their teeth sink in to the lead and they hold on to it easier. Sometimes I don't even use a hook because they get their teeth stuck in the lead.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Tungsten weights [Re: catslayer] #11438844 02/25/16 06:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,756
Huckleberry Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,756
Originally Posted By: catslayer
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
Why Tungsten? It is a weight, simple job....sink to the bottom. Not being a smarty pants here, I really don't understand the value or the extra costs.


you obviously haven't used them...

Smaller profile, tends to get more bites

Harder material, transfers vibrations up your line better increasing sensitivity.

With harder comes slicker... slicker plus smaller weight means the weight slips through the fish's lips easier so you don't have the use you sometimes have of a fish biting down on a led sinker and dramatically reducing the power of transferred in your hook set.

I'm not a "tree huger" I don't do it to keep lead out of the lake (I use lead c-rig and dropshot weights) I do it because you catch more fish using them.

If your worried about fraying look up tackle tour, the tackle doctor (Aaron martens) and look at how he puts inserts in them. I have started...

As for best place to buy... Anglers pro hands down



Yeah I'm with ya and agree on everything you said but you lost me with this part...."slicker plus smaller weight means the weight slips through the fish's lips easier so you don't have the use you sometimes have of a fish biting down on a led sinker and dramatically reducing the power of transferred in your hook set". hmmm

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439189 02/25/16 08:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 638
E
El Skeeter Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
E
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 638
Met a guy at the Southern Open on Toho he got his from
Jig Shack.

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Huckleberry] #11439259 02/25/16 09:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,853
C
catslayer Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
C
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,853
Originally Posted By: Huckleberry
Originally Posted By: catslayer
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
Why Tungsten? It is a weight, simple job....sink to the bottom. Not being a smarty pants here, I really don't understand the value or the extra costs.


you obviously haven't used them...

Smaller profile, tends to get more bites

Harder material, transfers vibrations up your line better increasing sensitivity.

With harder comes slicker... slicker plus smaller weight means the weight slips through the fish's lips easier so you don't have the use you sometimes have of a fish biting down on a led sinker and dramatically reducing the power of transferred in your hook set.

I'm not a "tree huger" I don't do it to keep lead out of the lake (I use lead c-rig and dropshot weights) I do it because you catch more fish using them.

If your worried about fraying look up tackle tour, the tackle doctor (Aaron martens) and look at how he puts inserts in them. I have started...

As for best place to buy... Anglers pro hands down



Yeah I'm with ya and agree on everything you said but you lost me with this part...."slicker plus smaller weight means the weight slips through the fish's lips easier so you don't have the use you sometimes have of a fish biting down on a led sinker and dramatically reducing the power of transferred in your hook set". hmmm


Take a pair of pliers... go grab a 1/2 ounce lead weight on a trig and have your buddy set the hook from 20 yards out...

then do the same thing with a tungsten...

you'll understand immediately...

That slick hard deal keeps their little tiny teeth from "grabbing" the weight. So all the energy is transferred all the way to the hook and MOVES the hook.

They cant clamp down on the weight as well, so it "slips" in their mouth, a hook cant get sunk into flesh unless it moves in the fishes mouth. If they can "hold" the weight you just jerk the fish around little and they open their mouth and let go...

this is MUCH more pronounced in 3/4 and bigger weights

Last edited by catslayer; 02/25/16 09:16 PM.

"I'll never mess with bee's or wasp anymore, and I'll never gig another beaver..." Words from a man who learned things the hard way
Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439327 02/25/16 09:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
T
TxRanger1 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
It really doesn't matter to me what anyone uses or why they use it but I have never in my life seen such a sales job done on so many people as this. If you cant set the hook and get that little bitty weight out of the fishes mouth to get the hook in, maybe you should buy Wheaties rather than slick weights.
'It will help you catch more fish" was Jimmy Houston's big saying when he was selling on the TV fishing shows and a lot of people are still drinking the KoolAide I see.

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439710 02/26/16 12:51 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 358
blackhorse Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 358
awesome

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439737 02/26/16 01:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 38,576
F
Frank the Tank Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
F
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 38,576
popcorn


Jesus loves all of us
Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439743 02/26/16 01:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 29
Trevor Gowin Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 29
duel

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439767 02/26/16 01:16 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 317
T
Troutnout Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 317
Man I didn't realize I would start this.. Maybe I'll just import some in from China myself.... roflmao


Official Wannabe
Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439801 02/26/16 01:29 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,620
3
361V Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
3
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,620
Learning lots today!

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: TxRanger1] #11439839 02/26/16 01:41 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,340
B
Bobby Milam Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
B
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,340
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
It really doesn't matter to me what anyone uses or why they use it but I have never in my life seen such a sales job done on so many people as this. If you cant set the hook and get that little bitty weight out of the fishes mouth to get the hook in, maybe you should buy Wheaties rather than slick weights.
'It will help you catch more fish" was Jimmy Houston's big saying when he was selling on the TV fishing shows and a lot of people are still drinking the KoolAide I see.


You sir are a fool! LOL. Don't you know you must have tungsten weights, 70k boat, power poles, 65" fish finders (4 of them), 20 rods, the ninja hood and chapstick to catch fish??? This is 2016 if you haven't heard. What do you think, your Grand Pa used to use a cane pole or what?

I was reading this and thinking the same thing about a fish biting a weight.

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11439992 02/26/16 02:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,127
F
fitter2259 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
F
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,127
I keep hearing the argument for increased sensitivity mentioned when the subject of tungsten comes up. Personally I think your line plays the major roll in sensitivity being the direct connection to the hook and that anything that comes between your line and the hook has a deadening effect on sensitivity and not increasing it, no matter what the material make up would be. I do like tungsten on shorter, baits of 6 inches or less due to the fact that the smaller weight profiles smaller offerings better but on baits ranging from 8 to 12 inches I personally think the size advantage of tungsten is negligible. I am more concerned with the weights profile than I am its chemical makeup, tapered weights are a must for me in heavy matting or heavy timber.


Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11440027 02/26/16 02:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,421
Okie Poke Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,421
You're better off if you can keep the weight somewhat same color as bait. And yes, tungsten is a must.


😎 Dallas Cowboys....eventual Superbowl Champions 😎



Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Bobby Milam] #11440624 02/26/16 01:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
T
TxRanger1 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 644
Originally Posted By: Bobby Milam
Originally Posted By: TxRanger1
It really doesn't matter to me what anyone uses or why they use it but I have never in my life seen such a sales job done on so many people as this. If you cant set the hook and get that little bitty weight out of the fishes mouth to get the hook in, maybe you should buy Wheaties rather than slick weights.
'It will help you catch more fish" was Jimmy Houston's big saying when he was selling on the TV fishing shows and a lot of people are still drinking the KoolAide I see.


You sir are a fool! LOL. Don't you know you must have tungsten weights, 70k boat, power poles, 65" fish finders (4 of them), 20 rods, the ninja hood and chapstick to catch fish??? This is 2016 if you haven't heard. What do you think, your Grand Pa used to use a cane pole or what?

I was reading this and thinking the same thing about a fish biting a weight.


I stand corrected.

Re: Tungsten weights [Re: Troutnout] #11440689 02/26/16 01:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,120
B
Brad R Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,120
Not that all weights are 100% pure tungsten or lead . . . I know some/most are not . . . but just looking at their densities gives us a clue.

Tungsten is 1.73 times heavier than lead, so a quarter (.25) ounce tungsten weight will be the same size as a .14 ounce lead weight.

So, all the other points aside, one big advantage I see is the fact that smaller weights tend to hang up much less frequently, at least that has been my experience . . . and certainly for bank fishermen.

I rarely hang up a weightless worm, and if I put a tiny split shot on the line above a worm to get it down a bit quicker, it increases the chances of hanging up just a bit more as I increase the size of the shot.

Same, for me, with bullet weights on T-Rigs: the smaller ones tend to pass through or over or around snags a bit better.

This definitely isn't a cost-benefit analysis where one would compare the increased costs of tungsten over lead to how much is then saved by losing less terminal tackle and baits, but it makes paying more for tungsten seem more reasonable, perhaps even at some sort of cost parity with lead in some cases.

One poster said he used lead for drop shots, tungsten for other applications and this sounds very reasonable to me. Pick your spots.

Brad

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3