Forums59
Topics1,039,368
Posts13,963,451
Members144,202
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: patriot07]
#10980436
07/16/15 02:28 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
[quote=BassBucknBeer]You know what's funny is I got the title to my 2014 tundra in the mail a couple of weeks ago and right there on the title it says 3/4 ton... guess I should call the DMV and tell them the truck isn't heavy duty enough for that distinction.
Nearly every half ton vehicle fits that description. So it sounds lik you probably should call the DMV. Check this out, here are some important stats for a 2014 tundra and a 2014 2500HD chevy (With gas engine) (these are both extended cab figures.) ....................Tundra..............................2500HD engine..............360HP,380TQ.......................381HP, 401TQ Curb weight.........6153lbs............................5760lbs trans...............6 speed............................6 speed Rear axle.............3.73..............................4.30 Brakes F..............12.8".............................13.9" Brakes R..............12.8".............................13.6" trailer towing........9700lbs (w/3.73)..................10,200lbs GCWR..................16,000............................16,000 Lenght................240"..............................229" Width.................80"................................80" Wheelbase.............153"...............................145.7" Hope you all see what I did here.....
Last edited by BassBucknBeer; 07/16/15 02:32 PM.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: redchevy]
#10980451
07/16/15 02:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
If they can bring 355 hp and 555tq along with 25+ mpg to fruition then it sounds like a hell of a pickup.
I find it hard to believe that a 5.0 putting out those numbers will get 25 mpg when the ecodisel, a smaller, economy built and minded vehicle didn't even make that combined in testing. Guess we will see. I believe the 25+MPG figure is Highway not combined. And that is what they are shooting for. also, It will surpass 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR), which renders it exempt from EPA fuel economy testing. Thus, no fuel economy numbers will ever show up on the window sticker
Last edited by BassBucknBeer; 07/16/15 02:37 PM.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10980494
07/16/15 02:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
I believe you got the column headings backwards.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: redchevy]
#10980532
07/16/15 02:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
I believe you got the column headings backwards. (That was my joke)
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: BassBucknBeer]
#10980585
07/16/15 03:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
.................... 2500 HD.............................. TUNDRAengine..............360HP,380TQ.......................381HP, 401TQ Curb weight.........6153lbs............................5760lbs trans...............6 speed............................6 speed Rear axle.............3.73..............................4.30 Brakes F..............12.8".............................13.9" Brakes R..............12.8".............................13.6" trailer towing........9700lbs (w/3.73)..................10,200lbs ...................... 13,000 lbs (w standard 4.10)...................... 14200 5th wheelGCWR..................16,000............................16,000 ...................... 20,500 (w standard 4.10)Max Payload...........3379 lbs...........................1595lbsMax GVWR..............9500..............................6900Lenght................240"..............................229" Width.................80"................................80" Wheelbase.............153"...............................145.7" Hope you all see what I did here..... That comparison can look a little different too.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: redchevy]
#10980714
07/16/15 03:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
.................... 2500 HD.............................. TUNDRAengine..............360HP,380TQ.......................381HP, 401TQ Curb weight.........6153lbs............................5760lbs trans...............6 speed............................6 speed Rear axle.............3.73..............................4.30 Brakes F..............12.8".............................13.9" Brakes R..............12.8".............................13.6" trailer towing........9700lbs (w/3.73)..................10,200lbs ...................... 13,000 lbs (w standard 4.10)...................... 14200 5th wheelGCWR..................16,000............................16,000 ...................... 20,500 (w standard 4.10)Max Payload...........3379 lbs...........................1595lbsMax GVWR..............9500..............................6900Lenght................240"..............................229" Width.................80"................................80" Wheelbase.............153"...............................145.7" Hope you all see what I did here..... That comparison can look a little different too. Actually I believe if you compare apples to apples, w/4.10 rear and extended cab, the 2500hd is 10,200 lbs max tow and 16,000lbs GCWR.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10980731
07/16/15 03:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
What I put in red was 4.10 gears and extended cab 2wd. The info I posted is for a 2015, not a 2014.
Last edited by redchevy; 07/16/15 03:59 PM.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10980756
07/16/15 04:05 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
Ok, the 2015's are a little different with a 8 speed (I believe) and other changes that I don't know
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: redchevy]
#10980757
07/16/15 04:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
What I put in red was 4.10 gears and extended cab 2wd. The info I posted is for a 2015, not a 2014. Found the numbers for 2014 and they seem to be right in line with what the 15's are.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10980765
07/16/15 04:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
According to GM's website the 2015 2500 HD 6.0 gas v-8 is still using a 6 speed auto.
Last edited by redchevy; 07/16/15 04:08 PM.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10980773
07/16/15 04:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
Anyway the op was about the new diesel not comparing a gas tundra to a gas chevy. If I was looking for a gas truck to pull the boat around or drive back and forth to work I would easily pick the tundra over the 2500 hd. If was going to hook a flatbed to it and drag around 6-10k lbs with frequency I would reverse that decision. The trucks are made for different purposes.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: redchevy]
#10981114
07/16/15 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423
BassBucknBeer
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 423 |
What I put in red was 4.10 gears and extended cab 2wd. The info I posted is for a 2015, not a 2014. Found the numbers for 2014 and they seem to be right in line with what the 15's are. I stand corrected. I find it interesting that No matter what body configuration you select, the towing capacity stays the same... even when comparing a regular cab to an extended cab-long bed, where the weights are hundreds of pounds different, they have the same capacity. I don't think any other manufacturer does that. Just again proves that each manufacturer puts whatever capacity they want to try to win the arm wrestling match... my point behind the post was to show that the tundra has more power, bigger brakes, more gearing, and is nearly identical in every other category than a modern 2500hd gmc and yet Noone considers it equivalent... Beggs the question. What actually makes a 1/2 ton different than a 3/4 ton? Because they put that sticker on them and charge more? Maybe a ecoboost f150 should be a 3/4 ton too? Question: why does a truck that has less power,smaller brakes, less gearing have a higher towing capacity? And why does going from 3.73 rear to a 4.10 give you 4500lbs more without changing anything else? Answer: because GM says it's so...they create the numbers... And I am sorry for hyjacking the thread, it trended this way.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: lodell23]
#10982425
07/17/15 05:04 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 36,469
Allison1
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 36,469 |
My 2000 3/4 came with E rated tires with a maximum of 80psi. Most if not all heavy duty trucks have heavy duty tires.
I'm not familiar with the Tundra but I think if nothing else it needs a different shoe.
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: BassBucknBeer]
#10982529
07/17/15 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26,175
patriot07
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26,175 |
What I put in red was 4.10 gears and extended cab 2wd. The info I posted is for a 2015, not a 2014. Found the numbers for 2014 and they seem to be right in line with what the 15's are. I stand corrected. I find it interesting that No matter what body configuration you select, the towing capacity stays the same... even when comparing a regular cab to an extended cab-long bed, where the weights are hundreds of pounds different, they have the same capacity. I don't think any other manufacturer does that. Just again proves that each manufacturer puts whatever capacity they want to try to win the arm wrestling match... my point behind the post was to show that the tundra has more power, bigger brakes, more gearing, and is nearly identical in every other category than a modern 2500hd gmc and yet Noone considers it equivalent... Beggs the question. What actually makes a 1/2 ton different than a 3/4 ton? Because they put that sticker on them and charge more? Maybe a ecoboost f150 should be a 3/4 ton too? Question: why does a truck that has less power,smaller brakes, less gearing have a higher towing capacity? And why does going from 3.73 rear to a 4.10 give you 4500lbs more without changing anything else? Answer: because GM says it's so...they create the numbers... And I am sorry for hyjacking the thread, it trended this way. I won't disagree with any of this. Much like the mpg figures, the tests used to be manufacturer-specific and are now standardized. They should do the same with towing specifications IMHO.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. - Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
Re: Tundra diesel?
[Re: patriot07]
#10982561
07/17/15 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,490 |
What I put in red was 4.10 gears and extended cab 2wd. The info I posted is for a 2015, not a 2014. Found the numbers for 2014 and they seem to be right in line with what the 15's are. I stand corrected. I find it interesting that No matter what body configuration you select, the towing capacity stays the same... even when comparing a regular cab to an extended cab-long bed, where the weights are hundreds of pounds different, they have the same capacity. I don't think any other manufacturer does that. Just again proves that each manufacturer puts whatever capacity they want to try to win the arm wrestling match... my point behind the post was to show that the tundra has more power, bigger brakes, more gearing, and is nearly identical in every other category than a modern 2500hd gmc and yet Noone considers it equivalent... Beggs the question. What actually makes a 1/2 ton different than a 3/4 ton? Because they put that sticker on them and charge more? Maybe a ecoboost f150 should be a 3/4 ton too? Question: why does a truck that has less power,smaller brakes, less gearing have a higher towing capacity? And why does going from 3.73 rear to a 4.10 give you 4500lbs more without changing anything else? Answer: because GM says it's so...they create the numbers... And I am sorry for hyjacking the thread, it trended this way. I won't disagree with any of this. Much like the mpg figures, the tests used to be manufacturer-specific and are now standardized. They should do the same with towing specifications IMHO. I thought they already did standardize the rating system last year or early this year didn't they? If nothing else the tundra's max towing should be limited by its payload. Supposed to have 10-15% tongue weight. On a 13000 lb trailer that comes to 1300 lbs which is probably pretty close to max payload for some of the crew cab's. Don't forget you also have to include the driver anything else you have in or have added to the truck and if its a Gooseneck/5th wheel the weight of the hitch itself.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|