There is an interview with wife, it is suggested that a witness went into the store to report the shooter harassing the woman and the husband hears it. If this is your wife and it was going down as such how are you walking out there.

If you take this position and apply it to the simple if a=b and b=c then a=c you come up with a guy is shot for parking in handicap spot. You really want that type of world.

There are some people who should not carry.

If your gun makes you bold you should not have a gun.

If it's not your parking lot the enforcement of parking spots is not your business.

He was in the wrong for initiating and escalating a situation he had no business involving himself in.

He should have informed the store clerk and left it at that. I hope he likes jail food.

So now you are calling the widow character into question. Lol I watched interview with her last week. She said he was cussing and ranting at her. I'm as right as you can get on most issues and all for people defending themselves. That said it's funny how a black person has a whole different burden of proof applied to their actions and their character.

My grandma often had a tough time finding parking spots when we'd go places. She could barely walk, but some young person would stroll out and jump into a car in a handicap spot and drive off. As a kid, I absolutely hated it. So no, I don't agree at all with the "it's not your business" philosophy.

I don't confront people about it, but I won't begrudge those who do. The world would be a better place if people were less willing to do things that are blatantly wrong because they were afraid someone would call them out on it.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/victims-girlfriend-florida-gunman-provoked-fatal-stand-ground/story%3Fid%3D56751894&ved=2ahUKEwjYjbKP2-zcAhUHTawKHQNVD3wQqUMwBnoECAgQHA&usg=AOvVaw0m8pdfGA0m5D5kSN5zv3gf

"The victims girlfriend" who has the most to lose and gain now recounts the events in a way than doesn't paint a picture of her or her man doing anything wrong. And we are supposed to accept her version of the events? We know that she does not like to follow basic laws and we have a video of a very large man assaulting someone and yet they are the victims? if the shooter has an attorney I would hope that the advice that is being provided is don't say anything until the courtroom. The girlfriend who instigated the whole scenario is probably following her attorney's advice to start the propaganda process and sway public opinion to the fullest extent possible. I'm sure she feels a lot of guilt for her part in this, but don't attack someone if you don't want to get shot. Very simple way to live your life.

Here is a link to an article where one punch killed someone and he is being charged with misdemeanor assault (as of the publication of this article). So to think that the shooter could not have been easily killed is fooling yourself.

https://blackamericaweb.com/2018/08/10/c...oking-for-uber/

so if hen the guy got pushed to the ground for confronting the woman pulls a gun the woman protecting her husband from immanent threat could have shot him from through the window of the car and we would call it stand your ground? or if after the guy on the ground pulled his gun is the pusher legally able to pull his gun? so we have a legal gun fight, all three of them shooting it out and the one who lives was in the right?

This is so senseless it is a shame. 2 morons park in handicap spot, a guy decides to say something, ok fine. Gets pushed, pulls out his gun and should have just left it right there. If he had come at him again, he is prepared to shoot, otherwise you have neutralized the situation. The video I saw did not look like he was in danger when he shot, so he screwed up there. But, if the 2 morons had not parked there, this never happens and is not a story.