|
Forums59
Topics1,039,322
Posts13,962,836
Members144,199
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: Paid in full
[Re: grout-scout]
#12487844
11/01/17 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,408
dimitri
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,408 |
Not always worth it, if your boat has ever had any kind of repair work done to the hull they will usually deny any future claims. But if it’s in mint condition, might want to have agreed value insurance. I have never heard of that. I have had many customer with multiple claims on the same hull. Been several guys on a Champion Page in another forum that have been denied when their hulls split and the insurance adjuster came with a “previous fixed hull” denial. One guy bought a used 210 and the hull split lengthwise a few months after he bought it and he was denied on his claim. He had to scrap the hull since they would not cover it. 2 or them had the same issue and 1 had a denial on his transom. probably denied because there was no new sign of impact . only trannsoms ive ever heard covered were mfg defects.
Marine Electronics Installation
[by appointment only in Azle, Texas]
Graphs, Trolling Motors & Battery Chargers
|
|
|
Re: Paid in full
[Re: ChuChu1]
#12488611
11/02/17 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447
Jumpin J
Angler
|
|
Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447 |
I'm not sure what having it paid off, or not, has to do with insuring it. I would think the value of boat, motor, and contents, would make it a must, too much can happen, on the water or the road.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek ðŸ, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
