texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
MilesA, YellaCat91, JessieM, Joey Cortez, B-Razorback
119208 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 119,929
Bigbob_FTW 95,666
John175☮ 85,950
Pilothawk 83,281
Bob Davis 82,944
Mark Perry 72,554
Derek 🐝 68,327
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,589
Posts13,967,107
Members144,208
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Thinking about stepping up to side imaging [Re: Beltonbanger�] #11414207 02/15/16 01:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,369
C
Creamlevel Creek Kennels Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,369
Originally Posted By: Beltonbanger
Lots of Helix guys, but I'm sure satisfied with my Lowrance!


Also happy with my Lowrance's. But the discussion between SI & DI is a non-issue. They both have different purposes, and one will not do what the other will do. Manufactures is a personal choice.


Keith



Re: Thinking about stepping up to side imaging [Re: Jacob] #11414227 02/15/16 01:58 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,336
Jacob Offline OP
TFF Guru
OP Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,336
I want si just to locate brush fast and efficiently. Then I'll use DI to search over them in detail. Then sonar to stay on them. I actually prefer sonar on the front for sitting still and knowing when you're on the brush.


Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3