Has it gotten to be so common that people are numb to it?

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...no-timeline-for-ruling-on-patriots-probe

It sounds absurd that the Patriots would have to film the 1-12 Bengals for an advantage, would they?

I don’t know and I don’t care. Tony Dungy said you get zero benefit from filming the sideline since everything is communicated by ear piece. I think that’s accurate.

Yeah. Based on Dungy’sncomments I think this is all a misunderstanding. Pats know that. Not to say they haven’t bent the rules in the past, I think this is just a misunderstanding.

Wish the Cowboys would at least try to cheat to win.

How do you know that they are not cheating and still losing?

All teams cheat, but the patriots are the best at it!

Belicheck is clearly a great coach, but he manipulates, also known as "cheats."

Brady is a dang good quarterback, but he cheats, that's why he should have an (*) by his name next to his records.
This is why he should not be considered the greatest, despite what one dude in this fishing forum constantly brandishes.

Belicheck is the key to the number of wins. Heck, Cassel looked like a champ when he was their QB. NE is a "system" team, and many QBs could have won rings there.
They also have the advantage of being good "cheats," despite Dungy claiming that "filming from the sideline" is "not big deal."

Filming is just one other way the team has been caught.
It makes me wonder what else they do that has not been discovered.

...------

That's "cheating"? That's funny. Tell me there isn't a team anywhere that doesn't do everything it can to give itself a leg up. If taping/filming the opposing teams' game time sideline is "cheating" why isn't reviewing games "cheating"?