I could care less about "growing a state record". I would just assume SAL goes away and reintroduce natives to the area. Let mother nature do her thing, she is smarter than any of us. Also, I am sorry, but I don't see how letting bass spawn in its natural environment is worse on a lake than raising fish to fingerling and then stocking them. I'd rather those 15 or so SAL's that got taken out spawn in the lake and let mother nature do her thing. This infatuation about trying to grow 15 pounders while subsequently making the fishing tougher by introducing Florida strains baffles me, but then again I am not really a look at me trophy hunter either. Also, wasn't Fork better in the old days? Seems to me you Fork guys would almost agree with me. You will never convince me that trying to modify mother nature is the best thing for our resources. This is more about money and less about the angler. Anybody with a little common sense can see that. If they cared about the angler and our fisheries they would quit killing all our vegetation and fish habitat in certain lakes.
I could care less about growing a state record also....but ive said that before. Thats a red herring in this discussion. No ones talking about that right now.
I dont work for SAL...but im pretty sure their main goal isnt to grow a world record. I actually discussed that before, to which someone mentioned Operation World record and how it started before SAL and a world record was the original goal of the SAL program....and then someone corrected them on their timeline and the Operation World Record was a thing SAL did....and yea, thats probably more marketing than anything. Yea, im sure SAL is hoping for a world record and wouldnt mind it happening....but im pretty sure SAL is more like a specialized division within a group. That group is TPW....who I am of the opinion are in it to improve fisheries across the state as a whole versus growing a few stupid big fish.
Forget the DD's.....how many lakes can you go to in Texas and have a LEGIT, good shot at 8+? Id seriously say pretty much every single one that TPW has laid a finger on. What other state can you say that in? Hell....in some states an 8 pound fish is a lifetime PB.....and here in Texas an 8 pound is just kinda cool but would be cooler if it was a DD....because we are in texas. Any other state you lose your [censored] catching an 8+....i know I damn well did when I caught my PB.
IAlso, I am sorry, but I don't see how letting bass spawn in its natural environment is worse on a lake than raising fish to fingerling and then stocking them.
Thats the point JHS. You dont see it....but why should you be able to see it? What makes you a fish expert who understands all things fish related? NONE of us, myself include are fisheries biologist. And yea, Im sure you fish a ton. Have caught a ton of 5+ fish. Have learned tendencies of fish relative to external factors like weather, cover, etc.... Take pride in your fish catching ability and knowledge and all that......and theres nothing wrong with that. But honestly, can you not see how much hubris is involved when you make a statement like this, like you (or any other member of the fishing public, including myself) should know scientifically about fish growth? What research have you done aside from fishing that you feel you have the knowledge base to make determinations like taking Ivie fish for SAL sharing is bad for a fishery (or thats its bad for ivie more specifically)? Did you go to school to study this, do you conduct experiments....what is it you do aside from wet a line, that makes you feel you know more than people who not only are likely fisherman themselves, but who have also dedicated their time to learning about this largemouth bass?
Thats what I cant wrap my head around.