That’s all opinion on what we should have selected. Actually, we selected the 203 hull on advice of one of the former most noted R&D tooling staff from MH Champion, his second choice was the 202 hull. He’s one that Pat knows well, and his wife recently retired from our facility, being the only former long term Champion employee we had on Staff. Originally his (R&D tooler) comment was why would you want to do that with the way your hulls run. Quite Honestly, we told him, Because there’s still a Champion following that feel they’ve been left at the altar.
The hull we picked up came from Salt Lake City Utah, in late 2000’s pre-recession and was a bank repo, with a then current 250 XS on it. It was always a dry desert boat that had been repossessed. We only needed the bottom below water line and it was a MH 203, we also still have the boat. We cleaned up the bottom, molded a bottom mold, built a part and stitched that bottom into an existing Puma/Cougar hull. Then a mold was made, which was 2012 era. We shelved the project several times and restarted on it as time allowed. In the early stages we built an entire boat with intent to release in 2014, and we culled it at the time due to hole shot concerns.
Eventually in 2019 we decided to move forward with some urging from Champion owners. We also have several Champion loyalist in our present Bass Cat products who indicated they wouldn’t “go backwards” on the feel they have, speed and their existing drier rides. That was interesting as we asked them for their opinions several times at the TOC events on Table Rock. Which we sponsored the TOC since the Fish Boat Holdings end of production on the Stratos Elite (Champ) brand. The TOC came to a temporary end with CoVid now in 2020. It will only be a small gathering for special friends.
We were fighting with the choice of no hole shot, or no performance and that was our restriction. We picked it up and worked on it four times between the release and inception. Eventually it required hundreds of hours in mold work and tweaking. Even after the original Prototype we built years earlier (Matt’s) was finished, we had to go back again and tweak the second one several times before releasing final production in 2020.
The bow cut had a very dry ride from our hull, and very little of the bow meshes where a BCB hull is. That forward section keeps the water away from the occupants as it does on all of our bass models. We did roll the forward chines some for a drier ride also. The rear hull was where the challenge was as when we thought we could gain speed, we lost the turning and handling, or we lost the hole shot.
Obviously, Bringing older hull designs into today’s equipment weights, larger livewells, bigger trolling motors, more fuel, rear storages, heavier batteries, and more weight overall in boats. Well, it just was a fine tuning we found very difficult and we went back and forth on this hull tweaking areas. We needed to keep that wedge back somehow to retain the cornering, and the outside short turning strake. That outside strake came from our original 1971 Deluxe Tournament model. John Story was upset when dad dropped it on our hulls in 1972/‘73. Which he added to the 1976 16’ 8” Vee series, when he had Hubert Parnell pop a Skeeter Wrangler for that model.
As for the 202 and 203 variances, we left that decision on where to start with a man who should ave known more than all opinion.
As for the review, that’s Ken’s business. He was fair and his reviews will get much better and morph as he grows in experience. We do think three boats in his videos will improve and there are other aspects which will improve his sharing of opinion.
We do wish that we had known of this and we had no knowledge. Even Chevrolet, Ford and Dodge open their new products to Car & Driver, Motor Trend and Automotive reviews and have their staff available for even head to head comparisons. Those are the reviews we all read on vehicles. That would have answered many questions on patterns and things like shocks in torsions axles. You can’t place shocks on torsion axles, the rubber core acts as the shock and is a much higher cost. He would have done a better job with more accurate answers.
Overall we accept the review and appreciate that while it’s his opinion, he certainly stood his ethics shared and didn’t honestly trash anything.
It’s a niche, and we knew that going in. The Charger is registering overall around 25 to 35 bass boats a year, since the 210 was released. They were USA registering that same number of Charger bass boats annually before it was introduced. It’s a niche...
Now you also have more of the truth on the choice of hull we made.
Rick Pierce
BCB
”A little disappointing about the top end speed of the hybrid.”
“I’m not arguing, but the way his post have read, it’s never a positive tone with the boat. Now if it’s not really any better riding, fishing & slower than a regular Cougar I can see why he’s not thrilled with it. I know he made it to cater to a few of the Champion faithful, but even those guys say he should have gone with a 202, instead of the 203. I guess the 203 is more recent to most people though & easier to get ahold of one to splash.“