Texas Fishing Forum

Grapevine Robbery

Posted By: George Tabone

Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 03:55 PM

On the night of December 8th 3 men illegally entered Silverlake Marina and robbed multiple boats. Unfortunately mine was one of them. They stole 15 Shimano reels (Curado, Calcutta), several G Loomis, Shimano, and Castaway rods as well as almost every soft bait and most hard baits I own. In addition, they cut the ropes to my boat cover rendering it useless. If anyone becomes aware of fishing gear for sale that might match the description above, please inform me, Silverlake or Grapevine police. Any help would be appreciated. Like most of you, I work hard to obtain and maintain my fishing gear and these degenerates have taken it all from me. Thanks again. George Tabone
Posted By: gar1970

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 03:58 PM

Get a rope i hate thieves
Posted By: Mr. Incredible

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 04:00 PM

Mr. George, I hope you get everything back and that the thieves get what’s coming to them. Keel hauling comes to mind.
Posted By: fouzman

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 04:07 PM

Sorry to hear that, but the boats weren't robbed. They were burglarized.
Posted By: George Tabone

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 04:08 PM

You are correct
Posted By: JJ4MEL

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 04:11 PM

This sucks to hear!! Craigslist will be watched so I would suggest checking on a few local pawn shops in the next week.

hung
Posted By: LearnedHat

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 05:01 PM

Sorry to hear it. You think they would have cameras operating all over that place.
Posted By: George Tabone

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 05:15 PM

They have cameras and got some facial views and a shot of the car but could not make out the license plate. A better question is where was the security guard that is supposed to be there?
Posted By: LearnedHat

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 06:12 PM

Have they released the videos anywhere? Haven't seen anything on the news.
Posted By: Jon

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 06:31 PM

George, I'm sure sorry to hear about getting your stuff stolen and I hope Grapevine PD takes more of an interest in this case than some other DFW area departments do.

I realize they have more urgent things to do like tracking down murder suspects, rapists and child molestors but I sure do get tired of hearing when someone has stolen my stuff: "Look, you have to realize this doesn't work like CSI and stuff you see on TV" that's frustrating after about the 3rd time you've heard that from different departments.

They need to just make it legal to kill on sight when anyone is caught stealing your stuff like it used to be 150 years ago. Your gear has already been turned into meth for pennies on the $ and put into someone's arm, or smoked in a pipe. Once in a blue moon, this stuff has a good ending though. Any video you can get your hands on and then posted all over social media is your best shot. Most people hate thieves as much as you and I do.
Posted By: Gamblinman

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 06:39 PM

Originally Posted By: Jon
They need to just make it legal to kill on sight when anyone is caught stealing your stuff like it used to be 150 years ago.


You have that right in TX. Texas penal code contains a provision that grants citizens the right to use deadly force to prevent someone “who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft from escaping with the property".
Posted By: Jon

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 06:53 PM

Originally Posted By: Gamblinman
Originally Posted By: Jon
They need to just make it legal to kill on sight when anyone is caught stealing your stuff like it used to be 150 years ago.


You have that right in TX. Texas penal code contains an unusual provision that grants citizens the right to use deadly force to prevent someone “who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft from escaping with the property".

Did they change the part about "during the night time"?
I get the point, but I'm talking about where the sheriff used to come out and talk to you, you tell him what happened and he says "well I guess they won't be doing that anymore"

Not the part like it is now where Grandma gets interviewed by Shaun Rabb for the nightly news report and she says "But he was such a good boy, he didn't deserve to die like that. Then the local DA decides to bring it to the grand jury, and they decide to make an example of this vigilante justice and you wind up taking a second mortgage out on your house to defend yourself in the criminal trial first and then in the civil trial after grandma and the rest of the family testify to a jury of her peers how you've deprived all his different baby momma kids from their daddy who was such a goot boy and didn't deserve to die like that. That's the part i want to see changed.
Posted By: Ian Fellenbaum

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 06:55 PM

HATE to hear this I will keep my eyes open
Posted By: LearnedHat

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 07:00 PM

Originally Posted By: Jon
Originally Posted By: Gamblinman
Originally Posted By: Jon
They need to just make it legal to kill on sight when anyone is caught stealing your stuff like it used to be 150 years ago.


You have that right in TX. Texas penal code contains an unusual provision that grants citizens the right to use deadly force to prevent someone “who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft from escaping with the property".

Did they change the part about "during the night time"?
I get the point, but I'm talking about where the sheriff used to come out and talk to you, you tell him what happened and he says "well I guess they won't be doing that anymore"

Not the part like it is now where Grandma gets interviewed by Shaun Rabb for the nightly news report and she says "But he was such a good boy, he didn't deserve to die like that. Then the local DA decides to bring it to the grand jury, and they decide to make an example of this vigilante justice and you wind up taking a second mortgage out on your house to defend yourself in the criminal trial first and then in the civil trial after grandma and the rest of the family testify to a jury of her peers how you've deprived all his different baby momma kids from their daddy who was such a goot boy and didn't deserve to die like that. That's the part i want to see changed.


There are a lot of other obstacles in using this as a defense. If you shoot someone fleeing the marina with your fishing tackle, even if at night, you may be exonerated but it is not going to be smooth sailing.

The weird thing is:

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.



It is poorly written --- look how it seems have "nighttime" modify both "theft" and "criminal mischief" but not "burglary" --- always thought that was strange.
Posted By: Jon

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 07:31 PM

Originally Posted By: LearnedHat
Originally Posted By: Jon
Originally Posted By: Gamblinman
Originally Posted By: Jon
They need to just make it legal to kill on sight when anyone is caught stealing your stuff like it used to be 150 years ago.


You have that right in TX. Texas penal code contains an unusual provision that grants citizens the right to use deadly force to prevent someone “who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft from escaping with the property".

Did they change the part about "during the night time"?
I get the point, but I'm talking about where the sheriff used to come out and talk to you, you tell him what happened and he says "well I guess they won't be doing that anymore"

Not the part like it is now where Grandma gets interviewed by Shaun Rabb for the nightly news report and she says "But he was such a good boy, he didn't deserve to die like that. Then the local DA decides to bring it to the grand jury, and they decide to make an example of this vigilante justice and you wind up taking a second mortgage out on your house to defend yourself in the criminal trial first and then in the civil trial after grandma and the rest of the family testify to a jury of her peers how you've deprived all his different baby momma kids from their daddy who was such a goot boy and didn't deserve to die like that. That's the part i want to see changed.


There are a lot of other obstacles in using this as a defense. If you shoot someone fleeing the marina with your fishing tackle, even if at night, you may be exonerated but it is not going to be smooth sailing.

The weird thing is:

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.



It is poorly written --- look how it seems have "nighttime" modify both "theft" and "criminal mischief" but not "burglary" --- always thought that was strange.

Yes. Exactly. I want to see all that changed up to where it's cut and dried, not ambiguous or confusing.
It'll never happen but that doesn't keep me from wishing it would. There's no way in hell I'd risk killing someone now days the way the law is currently written over stealing my stuff unless my life or the lives of others were in danger. There was a time in the long past when we didn't have to worry about that and a lot less stuff got stolen - at least not by the same repeat offenders a lot of the time.
Posted By: Bandit 200 XP

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/19/17 10:37 PM

Originally Posted By: gar1970
Get a rope i hate thieves
Posted By: GROD

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 12/23/17 01:05 AM

I’ll be the first to say I hate thieves and think we should start cutting some hands off, but don’t leave it up to a security guard making 12 bucks an hour to protect your property... shouldn’t leave thousands of dollars of equipment in the boat to begin with... hope you had insurance.
Posted By: nitroslim

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/15/18 04:44 AM

I just bought a curado at a pawn shop. If you have a serial number I would be happy to check if it’s one of yours
Posted By: RedRanger

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/15/18 11:19 AM

Originally Posted By: fouzman
Sorry to hear that, but the boats weren't robbed. They were burglarized.


Perry Mason is that you?
Posted By: fouzman

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/15/18 05:40 PM

No, just a pet peeve of mine. Folks not knowing the difference between a robbery and a burglary.
Posted By: Jim Ford

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/16/18 05:50 PM

The burglary would qualify as a theft. However, the statute also stipulates "justified under 9.41". If you read all of chapter 9 you will see that the justification for deadly force is pretty much limited to the threat of serious bodily injury or death. A lot of shootings that haven't been strictly legal haven't resulted in indictments; that doesn't mean they were LEGALLY justified. People are fed up with crime, and we need to overhaul the system. I listened to a woman being interviewed (on NPR, naturally) that the left wingnuts touted as being a prominent expert on the criminal justice system. She went on and on about how this country is obsessed with building more prisons, and law enforcement feels obligated to fill them up, resulting in a huge prison population that shouldn't have been incarcerated. Of course, the peanut gallery was eating it up. Yet, when that burglar, or ID thief, or counterfeiter, or crooked businessman who just destroyed several families' lives gets a ten year sentence, he's out in months because "it was a nonviolent crime and we need more room for the violent offenders" and the cycle starts all over again. Ask a cop; you keep sending the same people back to prison for the same crimes, over and over again. Sentences are a joke. And who ever started the myth that the prisons are all about reforming crooks? That's pretty naive...........
Posted By: rb7764

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/18/18 03:11 AM

I hope you get your gear back. It disappoints me to hear this. I used to live in Grapevine and there used to be a couple of pawn shops on 26. Have you checked with them?
Posted By: Too Fat 2 Fish

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/19/18 09:05 PM

Originally Posted By: rb7764
I hope you get your gear back. It disappoints me to hear this. I used to live in Grapevine and there used to be a couple of pawn shops on 26. Have you checked with them?


I was in both those shops Tuesday - nothin' but junk
Posted By: gdeloach

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/19/18 09:39 PM

Keep in mind that when pawn shops take in "merchandise," they are required to retain it for a period of time before they can put it out for sale. It used to be 30 days. Don't know if that is still the law or not. If so, checking the displayed stock of a pawn shop now may not tell you the whole story.
Posted By: fray

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/21/18 01:37 PM

Good luck in getting your stuff back.
Posted By: uncle_bagster

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/21/18 10:27 PM

This could be slowed down with sting operations using tracking devices. Trying to get law enforcement to do it is another matter.
Posted By: Jim Ford

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/22/18 12:06 AM

"Trying to get fund law enforcement to do it is another matter."
Posted By: GarySHO

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/22/18 04:08 PM

George, if you send me your address I will put some stuff in a box and send to you. I have lots of duplicate plastics and hardbaits. Might help soften the blow some.
Posted By: CHAMPION FISH

Re: Grapevine Robbery - 01/24/18 11:47 PM

Good luck in getting your equipment back.
© 2024 Texas Fishing Forum