Forums59
Topics1,156,504
Posts15,811,787
Members143,321
|
Most Online36,273 Jan 23rd, 2013
|
|
Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
#14349805
04/22/22 02:27 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,478
TXMulti-Species
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,478 |
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14350304
04/23/22 01:11 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,588
rickt300
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,588 |
Boy would it be great if TPWD allowed commercial fishing of carp! Give Buffalo more room to expand their range. After all carp are an invasive species.
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14454785
08/21/22 12:47 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 20
maximum
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 20 |
Just me- I'm not understanding the whole newly found reverence for rough fish It hasn't been that long ago that you could fill a cargo ship with gar and carp taken by any means short of tossing a few sticks of dynamite in the water. I can't tell you at the gar we've bowfished over the years and I've never seen any scarcity. Back some years ago when I worked with several tournament bass fishermen, they'd pretty much chauffeur you around in their big nice gas guzzling bass boats and let you arrow as many gar and carp as you could. Seems to me like many in 2022 have more reverence and esteem for deer and fish than for the human species
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14456561
08/22/22 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,216
Osbornfishing
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,216 |
Personally, I like catching most species of fish in Texas and I have had many great days catching carp and buffalo. Both species are found in many Texas lakes and reservoirs, so managing them makes more sense then just pretending they aren’t there or wishing they weren’t there.
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: maximum]
#14457468
08/23/22 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 53
LordoftheMorning
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 53 |
It isn't all that newly found, people like me have been against the extermination of rough species for decades. Gar and bowfin, to name a few, are not only really cool looking creatures native to Texas but they are an important part of our ecosystem. We need to preserve our native fish and set limits. Shoot all the invasive carp you want.
Last edited by LordoftheMorning; 08/23/22 08:33 PM.
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14457525
08/23/22 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,214
KQT
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,214 |
Very sad that members get on this forum to bash fish they don’t like. Why? No body asked for your opinion, just enjoy fishing for the species you like. It’s obvious that the haters have never captured a big carp or buffalo or they would appreciate there power. Gar take exceptional skill to catch. As for bow fishermen, I never understood what joy they derive from killing just for fun. Kind of a sick. One last comment; if anyone wondered why this forum is not nearly as good as it used to be it’s due to people that just want to give negative opinions where they are not needed. BTW, TX Multi-Species has caught more big fish than any of the posting haters have ever dreamed of.
Common carp 23lb Goldfish 9.78lb Mirror Koi 14lb Blue Cat 30lb Bass 9.5lb
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14457755
08/24/22 03:01 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 884
Rowdy
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 884 |
It is called the Texas Fishing Forum, last I checked. Heck if they swim in the water, I like to fish for them. The big thing here is to use the right rigs for that fish... You don't use a deep sea rig to fish for your bait for bigger targeted fish. Superlite rig for bait or even a fly rod, is a blast for me. Heck using a cast net for shad is quite the blast for me also.
Carp, Buffalo or any of those species is a blast to fish for and I have caught them from 20-30 foot with different baits, to taking them off top water with a fly rod , just make sure your rig is right and your ready for quite the sporting fight. Least for me guys...
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: KQT]
#14467804
09/04/22 01:21 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,491
ToasterWEyes
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,491 |
Very sad that members get on this forum to bash fish they don’t like. Why? No body asked for your opinion, just enjoy fishing for the species you like. It’s obvious that the haters have never captured a big carp or buffalo or they would appreciate there power. Gar take exceptional skill to catch. As for bow fishermen, I never understood what joy they derive from killing just for fun. Kind of a sick. One last comment; if anyone wondered why this forum is not nearly as good as it used to be it’s due to people that just want to give negative opinions where they are not needed. BTW, TX Multi-Species has caught more big fish than any of the posting haters have ever dreamed of. I’ve bowFISHED a half dozen carp and buffs bigger than anything TX multi has ever caught in a single bow fishing outing for years….. You guys catch some big fish, and I’m sure it’s enjoyable. That’s what fishing is all about. Kudos. The deal is, when you go out at night and see the sheer number of fish that size or bigger in the lakes, catching a mid 30# or even 40# carp simply isn’t that impressive to me. They are a dime a dozen in our lakes. Plenty there for all. Even us bowfisherman….. The one thing I’ve seen that I will try is catching them on a fly rod like Osborne. That would be something. Looking for a reason to use the fly rod anywhere but Wyoming and Montana anyway, just need to upgrade from the 4W. Happy fishing fellas
Last edited by ToasterWEyes; 09/04/22 01:22 PM.
It's only a good cast if you catch a fish... Personal Best: 11.62 lbs
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: ToasterWEyes]
#14500510
10/10/22 01:41 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,156
dmunsie
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,156 |
I’ve bowFISHED a half dozen carp and buffs bigger than anything TX multi has ever caught in a single bow fishing outing for years. catching a mid 30# or even 40# carp simply isn’t that impressive to me. They are a dime a dozen in our lakes. Internet gold...pure gold. 
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14515217
10/25/22 03:54 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 16
BDL Angler
Green Horn
|
Green Horn
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 16 |
Do you guys ever use excrement for bait on these rough fish?
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14515286
10/25/22 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,216
Osbornfishing
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,216 |
No, but I did catch a 12.5 pound largemouth bass on cut carp. 
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14515369
10/25/22 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,230
Mckinneycrappiecatcher
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,230 |
I don’t feel you should kill a fish simply for the sake of killing them, as has been customary for many years with “trash fish” there are exceptions in closed systems like ponds with fish like bullheads or green sunfish, but otherwise there is a reason for every native fish in a waterway. I feel the only reason to keep rough fish is if you have a real use for them like bait, but I don’t believe in letting them simply go to waste.
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: Mckinneycrappiecatcher]
#14516076
10/26/22 07:18 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,491
ToasterWEyes
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,491 |
but otherwise there is a reason for every native fish in a waterway.. So you’re ok with the killing of carp then, as they aren’t native. Just not buffalo and gar. I can respect that.
Last edited by ToasterWEyes; 10/26/22 07:19 AM.
It's only a good cast if you catch a fish... Personal Best: 11.62 lbs
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: TXMulti-Species]
#14516283
10/26/22 02:34 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,821
Grainraiser
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,821 |
I have always felt that fish biologist know more about the subject than I do. I will always follow their lead. It does make me upset when someone catches a rough fish and just throws it up on the bank to rot. That's just wasteful.
|
|
Re: Minnesota Reconsiders the Term "Rough Fish"
[Re: ToasterWEyes]
#14525955
11/05/22 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,478
TXMulti-Species
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,478 |
I’ve bowFISHED a half dozen carp and buffs bigger than anything TX multi has ever caught in a single bow fishing outing for years….. The deal is, when you go out at night and see the sheer number of fish that size or bigger in the lakes, catching a mid 30# or even 40# carp simply isn’t that impressive to me. They are a dime a dozen in our lakes.
Sounds like a lot of hot air to me.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|