Still thinking about jumping to 19.2, and by passing 19.1.

Good stuff!

SK I really like the clarity of what I see on yours but the target separation still seems to be lacking. I’m also running a 106 ultra but on version 16.10 with livescope version 2.54. The last time I ran mine was in early October till this week due to a injury my youngest son had, so I’m on the fence as to update or just stay where I’m at for now. We just started fishing again this week and I’m not mad at my livescope picture but hung on weather to update or not being the new transducer won’t even be available till May or June. I know I’m a little behind on updates and wished I’d went to version 18 but I haven’t seen that option since the newest update came out. Just was curious what your opinion was since I know you’ll give a no BS honest opinion.
Also we really enjoy your videos, very informative.

Thanks, Cody

there are no one size fits all adjustments for any sonar unit.. conditions change, sometimes from lake to lake, or even different areas of the same lake,., you have to learn to adjust your unit on the fly to get the clearest returns thru the day.
a sonar ping doesnt change. you can speed them up, slow them down, use multiple frequencies, ect. the programming in the unit either diminishes the returns or enhances them,, sonar manufacturers use alot of different names to describe what is taking place, like filtering, color gain, enhancement,ect.
in the big picture of things they all really result in revealing or blocking out a portion if the sonar ping returns that are converted into digital images.
in my opinion it is alot better to learn to interpret what a sonar unit is showing when in a less "filtered" state than to try and adjust the filters on the unit to see only what you want to see, ,,, you will filter out baitfish, thermoclines, bottom fish, and so on.