|
Forums59
Topics1,039,225
Posts13,961,204
Members144,196
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159513
10/13/21 02:26 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095
RickS.
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095 |
There are several British bands I would rather listen to over either of these two.
Led Zeppelin
The Who
Free
Black Sabbath
Deep Purple
Pink Floyd
Iron Maiden
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159515
10/13/21 02:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172
hopalong
Pescador Loco
|
|
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172 |
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: CKINCAID]
#14159516
10/13/21 02:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 119,870
TexDawg
Top Dawg
|
|
Top Dawg
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 119,870 |
This, I have neither band on my fairly extensive rock library.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159517
10/13/21 02:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095
RickS.
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095 |
Forgot to add Judas Priest to that list
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159526
10/13/21 02:36 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172
hopalong
Pescador Loco
|
|
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172 |
I watched the beatles first time on american television, ed sullivan, 63.
they were the rage because they had the hair, new type of rock n roll and millions of girls swooning over them. it was all about publicity but they did make some awesome music, yellow submarine is one of my favorites
prefer the stones over the bugs, I just like the bluesy style they have and if you look at it straight on they are still goin strong in their 70s. gotta give them that.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159536
10/13/21 02:44 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,774
Holzer
TFF Celebrity
|
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,774 |
Remember that year where the stones were the big super bowl headliner. It was awful 
Holzer My pic is gone 
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159538
10/13/21 02:46 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,622
Razorback
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,622 |
The Beatles are by far the biggest musical group of all time. No one else comes close. They are to bands what Elvis is to solo acts and Babe Ruth is to athletes, the biggest stars in history.
I never cared much for the Stones. They have about five songs that don't cause me to change the station when they come on.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159555
10/13/21 02:55 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 31,281
HasBen
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 31,281 |
The Beatles changed music forever. The Stones were another good band from England.
"Nothing spoils a good story like the arrival of an eyewitness."-Mark Twain
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: HasBen]
#14159560
10/13/21 03:02 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095
RickS.
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095 |
The Beatles changed music forever. The Stones were another good band from England. So you're saying pop music wasn't boring as hell before the Beatles? Because they were about as boring a band as I've heard.
Last edited by RickS.; 10/13/21 03:15 PM.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159572
10/13/21 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172
hopalong
Pescador Loco
|
|
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172 |
beatles are listen to music
stones you can dance to
should have seen the chaperones at one of the sock hops at our jr. high, thought we were all gonna be expelled forever the first time. good times!
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Samsonsworld]
#14159577
10/13/21 03:15 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,460
RayBob
Super Freak
|
|
Super Freak
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,460 |
Kind of like asking who do you like better, Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi? :roflmao 
Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159579
10/13/21 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,460
RayBob
Super Freak
|
|
Super Freak
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 54,460 |
I like the sounds of the Stones better. Cannot stomach mick Jagger and is pedo lusting azz !
Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#14159580
10/13/21 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,622
Razorback
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,622 |
The people who bought and listened to enough Beatles records to give them to the top five spots on the Billboard chart in the same week...the only time any act has come close to doing that...apparently didn't think they were boring.
April 4, 1964
1. Can't Buy Me Love
2. Twist And Shout
3. She Loves You
4. I Want To Hold Your Hand
5. Please Please Me
They had 20 number one songs in eight years. 8 of their last 10 singles went to #1, and the two that didn't were #4 and #8. Maybe some people didn't care for them, but more people did love them than any band in history.
|
|
|
Re: The Beatles vs. The Stones
[Re: hopalong]
#14159581
10/13/21 03:17 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095
RickS.
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,095 |
beatles are listen to music
stones you can dance to
should have seen the chaperones at one of the sock hops at our jr. high, thought we were all gonna be expelled forever the first time. good times! Your new pledge name is now Sock Hops 
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
