texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
hawgwildv2, Ben Burkhalter, Tx dinkslayer, BigLaker, Ricky_75457
119394 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 122,011
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 100,073
Bob Davis 88,766
John175☮ 86,096
Pilothawk 83,575
Mark Perry 73,396
Derek 🐝 68,426
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,047,899
Posts14,114,261
Members144,394
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Lithium as a Cranking Battery #14156258 10/10/21 11:28 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 26
Michael Kersey Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 26
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: Michael Kersey] #14156295 10/10/21 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,956
Happykamper Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,956
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.


[Linked Image]
Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: Happykamper] #14156298 10/10/21 12:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 167
K
KYBluefan Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
K
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 167
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.



Mercury's parent company just bought relion.

https://boatingindustry.com/news/2021/09/02/brunswick-acquires-relion-battery-llc/

Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: KYBluefan] #14156300 10/10/21 12:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,002
G
grout-scout Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,002
Originally Posted by KYBluefan
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.



Mercury's parent company just bought relion.

https://boatingindustry.com/news/2021/09/02/brunswick-acquires-relion-battery-llc/




And to piggy back. Rangers come standard with a Tracker lithium and Nitro has it as an available option. Both boats come with Mercury motors, but the Tracker lithium is also made by ReLion. They were doing this before Brunswick actually purchased ReLion too.

Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: Happykamper] #14156315 10/10/21 12:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 13,463
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 13,463
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.


Yup, its in the manual. They also said no synthetic oil but just released their own line. Now that they bought ReLion I'm sure it won't be long before they approve their battery.

Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: tmd11111] #14156420 10/10/21 02:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,956
Happykamper Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,956
Originally Posted by tmd11111
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.


Yup, its in the manual. They also said no synthetic oil but just released their own line. Now that they bought ReLion I'm sure it won't be long before they approve their battery.

I hope they do, I was told it was something to do with the engine alternator, I would suspect they will make changes to the alternator or the battery so they can sell them for cranking.


[Linked Image]
Re: Lithium as a Cranking Battery [Re: Happykamper] #14156483 10/10/21 03:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 39,300
Allison1 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 39,300
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by tmd11111
Originally Posted by Happykamper
Originally Posted by MichaelK
It seems that the idea of a Lithium battery as a cranking battery is split 50/50.
I have a Mercury Pro XS 250hp 4 stroke.
Why would I not want to have a Lithium cranking battery? Has anyone had issues with the motor due to the Lithium battery?

I was told Mercury would void warranty.


Yup, its in the manual. They also said no synthetic oil but just released their own line. Now that they bought ReLion I'm sure it won't be long before they approve their battery.

I hope they do, I was told it was something to do with the engine alternator, I would suspect they will make changes to the alternator or the battery so they can sell them for cranking.


Lithium's have lower resistance. They charge faster because they keep that lower resistance and lower losses for a long time. Whenever you try to charge a lead acid battery it won't take as high of a charge rate and as it heats up resistance rises even more.
A lithium which has lower resistance will take a higher charge rate and stay charging at that higher rate over a longer period. Mercury alternators have two bad characteristics that make it hard on it.
They do not cool the alternator very well at low rpm's and they aren't built to sustain a high rate of charge over time.
Both contribute to the problem.

It can be solved easily enough with a heat sensor and circuit that would change the charge rate. Maybe Mercury has stepped up on done this.


Originally Posted by Jons3825
I am wrong but you can not prove it, you just believe it enough from the bottom of your heart.....
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3