texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Daniel lee83, zooey026, allhandsondeck, thediscochef, rcpalaska
115869 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 104,068
hopalong 99,303
Pilothawk 81,173
John175☮ 79,876
Bigbob_FTW 75,739
JDavis7873 67,408
Derek 🐝 66,946
Mark Perry 63,768
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics1,155,699
Posts15,800,073
Members140,869
Most Online36,273
Jan 23rd, 2013
Print Thread
ford f150 w3.5 hybrid #14043497 06/26/21 12:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,394
RANGER SKI Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,394
Anybody towing with this hybrid? any info would be appreciated
thanks
ski

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14043611 06/26/21 03:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,182
D
Duke 22 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,182
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWf8L2g9Z4I
Long video but the results will surprise most.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14045242 06/28/21 12:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,857
F
Fishin' Nut Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
F
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,857
The 3.5 EcoBoost? I tow my boat with the 2.7, no problem.


Silence like a cancer grows
Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: Fishin' Nut] #14046189 06/29/21 04:03 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,024
T
TR176 Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,024
Originally Posted by Fishin' Nut
The 3.5 EcoBoost? I tow my boat with the 2.7, no problem.


I think he is asking about the one that has a battery of around 50hp to get rolling thus having better mileage.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14046479 06/29/21 02:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
My understanding is the truck is a hybrid, it can operate on electric alone some, but not extensively. It has a battery pack and a generator that runs off the truck, you can use it to power anything you would plug into a normal generator and if it can power it off the battery it will and if you call for more power it will start the truck on its own to provide it etc.

Other than that it has the 3.5 ecoboost and should tow like a freight train like all the other ecoboosts do.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14048769 07/01/21 12:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,284
Allison1 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,284
That video Duke posted showed the Ecohybrid was a beast towing at just under 8k pounds which was the maximum that the Ram was capable of but it got 2mpg less (6 vs 8) than the Dodge pulling up and down the Ike Gauntlet.
The Ram did have the 3.31 gears vs the Ford 3.93 gears.

The Ford seemed to easily pull the trailer up the hill at 2.5k rpms while the Ram was turning 4.5k and working harder.


I got the jab to protect myself, those around me, and to stop the virus.
Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14048868 07/01/21 02:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,717
S
Samsonsworld Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,717
I don't think it's the gears. Those ecoboosts can use a lot of fuel under extreme conditions. You make up for it under a normal commute, imo.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: Allison1] #14048882 07/01/21 02:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,208
C
Cmack Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,208
Originally Posted by Allison1
That video Duke posted showed the Ecohybrid was a beast towing at just under 8k pounds which was the maximum that the Ram was capable of but it got 2mpg less (6 vs 8) than the Dodge pulling up and down the Ike Gauntlet.
The Ram did have the 3.31 gears vs the Ford 3.93 gears.

The Ford seemed to easily pull the trailer up the hill at 2.5k rpms while the Ram was turning 4.5k and working harder.


I believe you have the gear ratios transposed. I've owned an F150 Ecoboost 3.31 and my son has a Ram 3.93 rear. Also had anF150 Ecoboost with a 3.15 rear and it seemed to tow better than the 3.31 or 3.55. Doesn't sound logical but the torque curve of the Ecoboost seemed to respond better to the taller gear.


Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14049175 07/01/21 06:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,284
Allison1 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,284
I went back and looked again. I did get the gear ratios wrong, as usual.

The Dodge was 3.21 and the Ford 3.73.


I got the jab to protect myself, those around me, and to stop the virus.
Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14049687 07/02/21 02:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,182
D
Duke 22 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,182
8 speed versus 10. but still achieved better time and economy with less braking.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14053926 07/06/21 06:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
I think it has very little to do with 8 seed vs. 10 speed and much more to do with forced induction, the ecoboost makes peak torque at 1/2 the rpm of the hemi and is why it operates at significantly lower rpm.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: Duke 22] #14053985 07/06/21 07:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,782
B
bronco71 Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,782
Originally Posted by Duke 22
8 speed versus 10. but still achieved better time and economy with less braking.

I'm sure economy would have been better on the Ford if they had SLOWED DOWN to the performance of the Dodge to reach 60mph at the same point
grin but what fun is that? And the braking was not much different, plus the Ford has a higher payload capacity and was more solid/tight with the load. Can't imagine those Dodge coils after a few years of towing....


1999 Triton TX21/225 Mercury Optimax
Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14054773 07/07/21 03:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,411
Ive got over 100,000 miles on the coil springs in my ram. Ive had over 2700 pounds in the bed and just drove around the past 3 days with a pallet and 1500 pounds of pavers in the bed. No worse for ware. I will say I am not a fan of the coil suspension, but it works, has a great empty ride and has not seemed to degrade with use as far as I can tell. I tow a 5000 pound boat regularly and have towed a 7500 lb 30 foot TT many times as well as utility trailers.

Re: ford f150 w3.5 hybrid [Re: RANGER SKI] #14105519 08/23/21 08:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 254
TXBoss Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 254
I was just on the Ford Website and seem to remember that the 3.5L Hybrid isn't available in all options (larger fuel tank comes to mind... as the 36 gal tank isn't an option).

Looking for some feedback here on usage too.


"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment..." - W. Rogers
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2021 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3