texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Brock P., Harry Urey Sr., Fishingwannabe, Jerrold, Don1969
115348 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 102,301
hopalong 96,941
Pilothawk 80,874
John175☮ 79,106
Bigbob_FTW 73,777
JDavis7873 67,402
Derek 🐝 66,618
Mark Perry 62,833
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics1,148,870
Posts15,706,598
Members140,348
Most Online36,273
Jan 23rd, 2013
Print Thread
Lake Whitney #14024358 06/08/21 10:54 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,241
M
marschall Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
M
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,241
Poor lake Whitney the whipping post of Texas lakes . 11 ft. over and still coming up .


May your wiener schnitzel always stay above your lederhosein.
Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14024556 06/08/21 02:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,924
3
361V Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
3
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,924
Yep. And it’s one of the lakes close to me I frequent(wont for a while now). 11.5’ above and rising. I live here outside Glen Rose & see the Brazos daily. It’s a flooded muddy mess. Granbury is basically a river releasing all the enters. It’s a flowing muddy mess full of floaters from one end to the other. Oh well. “Flood control” is a huge reason Whitney was built. BRA never lets PK or Granbury even get to full pool EVER so the COE on Whitney has to deal with managing the downstream flooding. The BRA has the right to release regardless of what/who is effected. Through all this Granbury & PK have remained 1’+ BELOW full pool. [Linked Image]

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14024610 06/08/21 02:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
B
BlueSkeeter13 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
Yep, happens every time there is flooding. PK and Granbury start dumping water and Whitney is left to hold the bag...so to speak. At least they are letting some significant water out of the dam at Whitney now. For the last week they have kept is at about 600 cfs, but I looked today and they have brought that up to 18,000 cfs now. PK is releasing 28,400 and Granbury is 31,640 so that's not going to help things at Whitney for a while.

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14025627 06/09/21 11:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,688
gborg Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,688
It has been a tuff year for everyone surrounding the Brazos River chain, the fishing has suffered as well.

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14025716 06/09/21 12:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,098
O
Osbornfishing Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
O
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,098
Flooding and drought…welcome to Texas. I would rather have temporary flooding than to see lakes like Granbury 11 feet low again. eeks

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14025989 06/09/21 03:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
B
BlueSkeeter13 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
Whitney came up 1' in the last 24 hours and is now 12.51' above "full pool". Granbury is now releasing 34,470 cfs and Whitney is at 25,152. So obviously Whitney will continue to rise at those rates. It looks like they have slowed down the release a PK a bit, probably to give the folks at Horseshoe Bend some flooding relief.

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: BlueSkeeter13] #14026518 06/09/21 11:17 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,814
R
Rayzor Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,814
Originally Posted by BlueSkeeter13
Yep, happens every time there is flooding. PK and Granbury start dumping water and Whitney is left to hold the bag...so to speak. At least they are letting some significant water out of the dam at Whitney now. For the last week they have kept is at about 600 cfs, but I looked today and they have brought that up to 18,000 cfs now. PK is releasing 28,400 and Granbury is 31,640 so that's not going to help things at Whitney for a while.


Why are they not kicking up the release? How much can they release? Doesn't the water coming out of Whitney and into the Brazos just go down river to the ocean???

BTW - we have crossed over the Brazos at 290 and it is high. Not as high as I've seen at other times but high.

Last edited by Rayzor; 06/09/21 11:18 PM.

Be safe,
Rayzor
[Linked Image]
2001 Triton Tx-21/225 Mercury EFI
Re: Lake Whitney [Re: marschall] #14027612 06/10/21 07:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
B
BlueSkeeter13 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 174
Looks like today Whitney is actually releasing more than PK and Granbury.
Whitney = 25,000
PK = 17,700
Granbury = 22,300

Re: Lake Whitney [Re: 361V] #14027627 06/10/21 07:11 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,610
T
Texan Til I Die Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,610
Originally Posted by 361V
...BRA never lets PK or Granbury even get to full pool EVER so the COE on Whitney has to deal with managing the downstream flooding. The BRA has the right to release regardless of what/who is effected. Through all this Granbury & PK have remained 1’+ BELOW full pool.
That's not exactly correct. Flood operations are a highly complex set of actions involving the cooperation of all entities involved, which in this case is the BRA and the COE. Both agencies are working together, along with several other water body controlling authorities, to determine the correct release rates from every lake in the Brazos Basin. Whitney has by far the largest flood pool which is why it typically catches and holds the most flood water.


If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin. - Samuel Adams
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3