texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Herb Schanke, Buzzbait91, MikeZachary, Charter Fishing Cancun, au350z
119427 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 122,412
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 100,723
Bob Davis 89,995
John175☮ 86,096
Pilothawk 83,651
Mark Perry 73,547
Derek 🐝 68,435
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,049,425
Posts14,140,748
Members144,427
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Another radom question for today. #14000898 05/17/21 05:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 5,074
D
Dogfish_Jones Offline OP
TFF Celebrity
OP Offline
TFF Celebrity
D
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 5,074
I have been thinking about buying the Humminbird 360, then I think I really do not need it as I already have Sonar, DI, and SI on all my graphs. Yea, I could see whats right in front of me I suppose but for $1500.00 for everything to get it up and running is it worth it? Of course that's an answer that depends on each person.
Then again why not wait unto the unforeseeable Mega Live comes out for Humminbird?
The question is if you have or have not gotten a 360, what swayed you in that answer?

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000905 05/17/21 05:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,438
D
Douglas J Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,438
360 is a pic of past event, live is live in real time


#MFGA
Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000926 05/17/21 05:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,114
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,114
360 is more important than SI/DI. Live is best in conjunction with 360.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000982 05/17/21 06:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,266
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,266
I would rather have live for the way I fish. I could see 360 working better for stuff like up north where ita huge flats and you are looking for boulders.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14001025 05/17/21 07:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,874
T
Tx Tree Grower Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,874
360 and live are two completely different technologies that I personally use for different things. 360 is great for finding cover / structure. Live is great for finding fish on that structure. I catch a ton of fish off of cover that I would never see without the 360. 360 and live work really good together. Think of 360 as a road map for what to aim your live at. I use both a ton. It's a shame humminbird can't figure out a live imaging system. Beginning to wonder if they will ever get theirs released. I got tired of waiting and purchased a Garmin.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14001050 05/17/21 07:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,090
S
sprigsss Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,090
We caught fish in 3-4' water for our club tourney Saturday.

Sunday we could only catch fish in 8-10'.

Seems like every tree i pitched a jig into at that depth had a fish in it.

Yet we were only able to fish the trees we could see.

360 would have made things a lot easier to see trees that we couldn't see, and even more importantly that the majority of the other anglers on the lake were skipping as well. I'm fairly certain 360 would have helped us put more fish in the boat yesterday.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3