texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
DFWLipRipper, CurtisKeller, Mike Barker, nebass97, Fishing243
115381 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 102,438
hopalong 97,127
Pilothawk 80,885
John175☮ 79,153
Bigbob_FTW 73,951
JDavis7873 67,402
Derek 🐝 66,645
Mark Perry 62,869
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics1,149,414
Posts15,713,990
Members140,381
Most Online36,273
Jan 23rd, 2013
Print Thread
Another radom question for today. #14000898 05/17/21 05:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 193
D
Dogfish_Jones Online Content OP
Outdoorsman
OP Online Content
Outdoorsman
D
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 193
I have been thinking about buying the Humminbird 360, then I think I really do not need it as I already have Sonar, DI, and SI on all my graphs. Yea, I could see whats right in front of me I suppose but for $1500.00 for everything to get it up and running is it worth it? Of course that's an answer that depends on each person.
Then again why not wait unto the unforeseeable Mega Live comes out for Humminbird?
The question is if you have or have not gotten a 360, what swayed you in that answer?


2020 Nitro Z20, Mercury 250xp 4 stroke
"Sometimes I have to remind myself that it is called Fishing and not catching"
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000905 05/17/21 05:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 11,951
D
Douglas J Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 11,951
360 is a pic of past event, live is live in real time


“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Benjamin Franklin
Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000926 05/17/21 05:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,299
G
grout-scout Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,299
360 is more important than SI/DI. Live is best in conjunction with 360.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14000982 05/17/21 06:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 7,569
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 7,569
I would rather have live for the way I fish. I could see 360 working better for stuff like up north where ita huge flats and you are looking for boulders.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14001025 05/17/21 07:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,372
T
Tx Tree Grower Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,372
360 and live are two completely different technologies that I personally use for different things. 360 is great for finding cover / structure. Live is great for finding fish on that structure. I catch a ton of fish off of cover that I would never see without the 360. 360 and live work really good together. Think of 360 as a road map for what to aim your live at. I use both a ton. It's a shame humminbird can't figure out a live imaging system. Beginning to wonder if they will ever get theirs released. I got tired of waiting and purchased a Garmin.

Re: Another radom question for today. [Re: Dogfish_Jones] #14001050 05/17/21 07:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,170
S
sprigsss Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,170
We caught fish in 3-4' water for our club tourney Saturday.

Sunday we could only catch fish in 8-10'.

Seems like every tree i pitched a jig into at that depth had a fish in it.

Yet we were only able to fish the trees we could see.

360 would have made things a lot easier to see trees that we couldn't see, and even more importantly that the majority of the other anglers on the lake were skipping as well. I'm fairly certain 360 would have helped us put more fish in the boat yesterday.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3