how bout when you buy the gun you have an hr. of instruction in how to load/fire and proper carry methods?

I by no means think there should be any qualification or license or any other bs to be able to buy a weapon, like a car you have to learn how to operate it to do it safely for yourself as well as others.


I will pose this question to you directly, since anyone crossing our border into the country is hence covered by our constitution and in light of our current pedophile inviting most of central america to "C'MON IN!" should they also be allowed to buy/carry?

Y'all don't have a Walmart ?

Its not difficult.

Maybe my concentration is on all the other wonders of Walmart lol. We've had constitutional carry here for some time now. I asked my wife, neither one of us have ever seen anyone open carry.

I have, but very rarely. Doesn't phase me.

same, see people from time to time open carry, so far only 2 carrying double (them I kept an eye on).

both were in atwoods in the gun section.

I kinda like open carry. It tells me who in my midst is a little off center and to be wary of them.

Can I pick who gets to carry? If so then I'm all for it but if you get to decide, I don't trust you so I vote against it. It's pretty simple.

Exactly. I avoid them in the rare instance of an encounter. Thankfully, most sane individuals don't see the need.

Ray Bob, this is one of the dumbest generalizations I have ever seen on here. These chiefs, mine included have had to bury a lot of young men due to gun violence. Just because they come to the issue with a different perspective and different experiences doesn’t mean they are liberal. Not every issue fits into a neat little liberal or conservative package.

The idea is that those rights are granted by our creator, not the government. At the time the constitution was written government(king of england) was denying people basic human rights across the board. I see it as listing which rights government should stay out of. Illegals by definition are law breakers and should be deported, however our current commander in thief is not enforcing the law. I think there is a two part answer. #1 fraud in chief should be removed for direlection of duty among other things and our borders should be enforced, those here illegally should have to leave. 2. Basic human rights are assumed to be given by God, and therefore I dont like it, but I would find it difficult to justify denying them the right to firearms if our government wont enforce immigration law. Also, illegal or not do you think denying those people the right to protect themselves and their families is going to keep them from doing it?

One hour training is a wise idea, and offering it is fine. Should it be mandated? I don't think so. Again, it falls on personal responsibility and it is not possible to force people to be responsible. What people should do, and whay they actually do are two different things. I suppose you may insert a training requirement based on " a well regulated militia" and that is worth considering. English law in centeries past said a man was obligated to own arms and proficiently operate them.

Why? The ones I've seen posed zero risk to me. I don't personally open Cary, but there is nothing to fear from it.

Then name a Sheriff of Chief of Police from a conservative county or city that opposes it.

Yep. Rayrob was spot on.