texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Mud hole 82, JBaer, Brent3B, Latetothegame, BDK3
114986 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 101,272
hopalong 95,392
Pilothawk 80,763
John175☮ 78,829
Bigbob_FTW 72,377
JDavis7873 67,402
Derek 🐝 66,256
Mark Perry 62,446
Forum Statistics
Forums61
Topics1,144,160
Posts15,634,329
Members139,986
Most Online36,273
Jan 23rd, 2013
Print Thread
Garmin vs Hummingbird sonar imaging #13910611 03/04/21 03:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
C
cg203 Online Content OP
Outdoorsman
OP Online Content
Outdoorsman
C
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Is Hummingbird a lot better imaging on down scan and side scan than the new Garmin with the 56 transducer? I eventually want to add Livescope or something similar but not this year. I currently don’t have anything on the bow, but do have a Garmin 93sv on the dash.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Garmin vs Hummingbird sonar imaging [Re: cg203] #13910652 03/04/21 04:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,162
P
Phoenix 920 Pro xp Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
P
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,162
they are really close now

Re: Garmin vs Hummingbird sonar imaging [Re: cg203] #13911670 03/05/21 12:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
C
cg203 Online Content OP
Outdoorsman
OP Online Content
Outdoorsman
C
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 116
Anybody else?

Re: Garmin vs Hummingbird sonar imaging [Re: cg203] #13911826 03/05/21 02:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,162
P
Phoenix 920 Pro xp Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
P
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,162
look at the images on the bbc boards.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3