texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
ntxfatherandson, Greenline, Okiefshr12, Rozzi, drew21
119132 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 120,361
TexDawg 119,402
Bigbob_FTW 94,755
John175☮ 85,879
Pilothawk 83,254
Bob Davis 81,206
Mark Perry 72,179
Derek 🐝 68,300
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,037,311
Posts13,926,078
Members144,132
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: Dan21XRS] #13768208 11/13/20 12:06 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,984
SAKS Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,984
Originally Posted by Dan21XRS
I'm working on a prototype casting net that deploys just milliseconds before it hits the water. Looks like a Manns E-Z 30+ crankbait but it's 30 feet around and retrieves just like a 1/2oz spinnerbait... Release date is undetermined, but once it hit the market... Miller Time... Dan cheers

Put me down for one.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: LeonSulak] #13768227 11/13/20 12:15 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,984
SAKS Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,984
Originally Posted by LeonSulak
Do the major tours also ban the Alabama rig?

I know BASS did. Not sure about MLF. I don’t recall seeing anyone using it on any of the shows.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13768539 11/13/20 04:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
S
SC-001 Offline OP
TFF Celebrity
OP Offline
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
FLW banned it too, be interesting if they change it now that MLF owns them and MLF has always allowed umbrella rigs I think

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13768541 11/13/20 04:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15,998
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15,998
Pretty sure the anglers in the BPT voted AGAINST using A-rigs.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13768547 11/13/20 04:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
S
SC-001 Offline OP
TFF Celebrity
OP Offline
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
I know I've seen them use them on MLF before, must have been the older shows

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: Lone_Wolf] #13768660 11/13/20 12:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 404
D
DarrellSimpson Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
D
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 404
Originally Posted by Lone_Wolf

Thanks . Good articles .

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769192 11/13/20 07:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,328
L
Lone_Wolf Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,328
thumb

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: Lone_Wolf] #13769290 11/13/20 08:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 41
E
Ekman Spiral Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
E
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 41
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769526 11/13/20 11:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 177
T
TexY3TI Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 177
I’m planning on selling my deck and console units and switching to straight Livescope up front....

...new game plan is pull up to a spot that looks good...idle around til they show up on the screen.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769531 11/13/20 11:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,209
shotgunwilly Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,209
This is funny. I challenge y'all to go out and try to snag one. Good luck.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769539 11/13/20 11:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 5,265
D
Darin S. Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
D
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 5,265
The answer is...NO.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769713 11/14/20 01:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
S
SC-001 Offline OP
TFF Celebrity
OP Offline
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,975
Originally Posted by Ekman Spiral
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed.

Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769722 11/14/20 01:46 AM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,184
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,184
Originally Posted by SC-001
Originally Posted by Ekman Spiral
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed.

Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done.

We've seen guys shove weights in fish, put them in baskets, keep them in the garage, etc. You can bet your butt if you can snag fish using the livescope somebody is going to do it.

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769766 11/14/20 02:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15,998
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 15,998
Good thing Mike Long didn’t have livescope!

Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth [Re: SC-001] #13769940 11/14/20 05:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,706
rj74955 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,706

Originally Posted by SC-001
Originally Posted by Ekman Spiral
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed.

Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done.

I've had one since before they came on the market, I don't think there is a human on the planet that could snag a bass intentionally using legal bass baits and livescope. You would have a lot better chance of getting them to bite a bait, it would be a huge waste of time. Now if they were using a 5 ounce weight and a giant snagging hook like they do for paddlefish, they might luck out and get one every now and then. I doubt it, but it's probably not impossible.

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3