|
Forums59
Topics1,039,229
Posts13,961,258
Members144,196
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: Dan21XRS]
#13768208
11/13/20 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,989
SAKS
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,989 |
I'm working on a prototype casting net that deploys just milliseconds before it hits the water. Looks like a Manns E-Z 30+ crankbait but it's 30 feet around and retrieves just like a 1/2oz spinnerbait... Release date is undetermined, but once it hit the market... Miller Time... Dan  Put me down for one.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: LeonSulak]
#13768227
11/13/20 12:15 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,989
SAKS
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,989 |
Do the major tours also ban the Alabama rig? I know BASS did. Not sure about MLF. I don’t recall seeing anyone using it on any of the shows.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13768539
11/13/20 04:03 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031 |
FLW banned it too, be interesting if they change it now that MLF owns them and MLF has always allowed umbrella rigs I think
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13768541
11/13/20 04:06 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,185
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,185 |
Pretty sure the anglers in the BPT voted AGAINST using A-rigs.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13768547
11/13/20 04:14 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031 |
I know I've seen them use them on MLF before, must have been the older shows
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: Lone_Wolf]
#13768660
11/13/20 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 404
DarrellSimpson
Angler
|
|
Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 404 |
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769192
11/13/20 07:03 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,392
Lone_Wolf
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,392 |
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: Lone_Wolf]
#13769290
11/13/20 08:20 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 44
Ekman Spiral
Outdoorsman
|
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 44 |
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769526
11/13/20 11:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 177
TexY3TI
Outdoorsman
|
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 177 |
I’m planning on selling my deck and console units and switching to straight Livescope up front....
...new game plan is pull up to a spot that looks good...idle around til they show up on the screen.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769531
11/13/20 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,210
shotgunwilly
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,210 |
This is funny. I challenge y'all to go out and try to snag one. Good luck.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769539
11/13/20 11:43 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 5,421
Darin S.
TFF Celebrity
|
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 5,421 |
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769713
11/14/20 01:41 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,031 |
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed. Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769722
11/14/20 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,200
the skipper
TFF Celebrity
|
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,200 |
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed. Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done. We've seen guys shove weights in fish, put them in baskets, keep them in the garage, etc. You can bet your butt if you can snag fish using the livescope somebody is going to do it.
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769766
11/14/20 02:15 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,185
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,185 |
Good thing Mike Long didn’t have livescope!
|
|
|
Re: Should Panoptix caught fish be caught in the mouth
[Re: SC-001]
#13769940
11/14/20 05:12 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,831
rj74955
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,831 |
To the op this is actually a good question and the first time I have heard it asked. Many people are dismissive of this until they watch somebody snag 25 pounds in front of them and their tune will change quick. This will come up in future tournaments guaranteed. Thank you, the question popped in my head watching the bassmaster show on ESPN3 replay. I feel the naysayers on this thread haven't used this tech yet(I know I haven't} or they have a advantage they don't want discovered before its closed, like the guy said about the paddle fish I bet it can be done. I've had one since before they came on the market, I don't think there is a human on the planet that could snag a bass intentionally using legal bass baits and livescope. You would have a lot better chance of getting them to bite a bait, it would be a huge waste of time. Now if they were using a 5 ounce weight and a giant snagging hook like they do for paddlefish, they might luck out and get one every now and then. I doubt it, but it's probably not impossible.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
