Forums59
Topics1,038,966
Posts13,956,593
Members144,184
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
#13656644
08/04/20 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 74
Bassboy1992
OP
Outdoorsman
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 74 |
It seems that every time I have time to go to the Trinity, it's down. And when it's down, I just cannot catch catfish! Managed to bring in this nice longnose gar, though! The landing was a little scuffed, but I got her back in the water right after a quick weighing. Just over 27 pounds! I can't even imagine what the 50+ pound state record looks like... Here's a short video of the trip. Hope y'all enjoy it! Thanks y'all! Catch you next time. - Chase
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13656656
08/04/20 11:14 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 75,736
banker-always fishing
Pumpkin Head
|
Pumpkin Head
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 75,736 |
Awesome post and a super video. Living the dream.
IGFA World Record Rio Grande Cichlid. Lake Dunlap. John 3:16 Sinner's Prayer. God forgive me a sinner. I accept Jesus Christ as my Savior !
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13656750
08/05/20 12:20 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 12,666
Curt0407
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 12,666 |
Way to go. That's a good un.
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13656769
08/05/20 12:35 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,839
Osbornfishing
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,839 |
Nice fish. Congratulations
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13657408
08/05/20 03:26 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84
Lepisosteus.carpio
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84 |
That's a very solid fish. 27 lbs is close to line-class record in some IGFA line classes. Length? Girth?
Btw, the state (world) record longnose is not a longnose. It's a hybrid AGxLNG. IGFA has a photo clearly showing it's a hybrid. I'm working with a couple of other scientists to have the record reclassified or withdrawn because it ain't a longnose. Pure longnose very rarely exceed 60" long--the state record fish was 72". We see hybrids that long commonly. Fish that are much longer than 60" are invariably a hybrid.
There are a few other record fish in the IGFA database that are "fishy" as well. Most of the records are at or below 60", but then there's one that's 69" and with a very odd length to weight ratio. Hoping to get photographs of all of the longnose record fish and see if we can't get a hybrid category in the IGFA database, because no one will ever break the 50 lb longnose record unless we're counting hybrids as longnose.
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13657475
08/05/20 04:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 21
Doc1986
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 21 |
Wow! Nice fish! That's how it usually goes for me. You go after catfish and you end up catching every other species but catfish lol.
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Lepisosteus.carpio]
#13668764
08/15/20 02:51 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,610
Gitter Done
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 17,610 |
That's a very solid fish. 27 lbs is close to line-class record in some IGFA line classes. Length? Girth?
Btw, the state (world) record longnose is not a longnose. It's a hybrid AGxLNG. IGFA has a photo clearly showing it's a hybrid. I'm working with a couple of other scientists to have the record reclassified or withdrawn because it ain't a longnose. Pure longnose very rarely exceed 60" long--the state record fish was 72". We see hybrids that long commonly. Fish that are much longer than 60" are invariably a hybrid.
There are a few other record fish in the IGFA database that are "fishy" as well. Most of the records are at or below 60", but then there's one that's 69" and with a very odd length to weight ratio. Hoping to get photographs of all of the longnose record fish and see if we can't get a hybrid category in the IGFA database, because no one will ever break the 50 lb longnose record unless we're counting hybrids as longnose. Good luck getting it changed! The IGFA has a lot of biologist on it's staff who are all over the world. Just like anything else I am sure you have a biologist who will dispute the IGFA's biologist. Who is one to believe in ? My guess the IGFA!
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13668770
08/15/20 02:55 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,568
JimBridger
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,568 |
I bet that was exciting! Congratulations on your awesome catch.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13677588
08/23/20 01:14 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 19,054
Laker One
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 19,054 |
Awesome!
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Gitter Done]
#13683654
08/28/20 06:30 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84
Lepisosteus.carpio
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84 |
That's a very solid fish. 27 lbs is close to line-class record in some IGFA line classes. Length? Girth?
Btw, the state (world) record longnose is not a longnose. It's a hybrid AGxLNG. IGFA has a photo clearly showing it's a hybrid. I'm working with a couple of other scientists to have the record reclassified or withdrawn because it ain't a longnose. Pure longnose very rarely exceed 60" long--the state record fish was 72". We see hybrids that long commonly. Fish that are much longer than 60" are invariably a hybrid.
There are a few other record fish in the IGFA database that are "fishy" as well. Most of the records are at or below 60", but then there's one that's 69" and with a very odd length to weight ratio. Hoping to get photographs of all of the longnose record fish and see if we can't get a hybrid category in the IGFA database, because no one will ever break the 50 lb longnose record unless we're counting hybrids as longnose. Good luck getting it changed! The IGFA has a lot of biologist on it's staff who are all over the world. Just like anything else I am sure you have a biologist who will dispute the IGFA's biologist. Who is one to believe in ? My guess the IGFA! Well, it's a hybrid, indisputable. We have a mountain of evidence to show this. They photo of the record fish is unequivocally a hybrid, it looks nothing like a pure longnose and exactly like dozens of examples of AG x LNG hybrid gar. And the "biologist" is the world authority on gar, a PhD ichthyologist professor with international reputation. Not some fisheries biologist with master's degree. I don't disagree that they might not make the change, but it won't be based on facts.
|
|
Re: Went after catfish, ended up with a big longnose gar!
[Re: Bassboy1992]
#13848641
01/16/21 05:33 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84
Lepisosteus.carpio
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 84 |
That's a very solid fish. 27 lbs is close to line-class record in some IGFA line classes. Length? Girth?
Btw, the state (world) record longnose is not a longnose. It's a hybrid AGxLNG. IGFA has a photo clearly showing it's a hybrid. I'm working with a couple of other scientists to have the record reclassified or withdrawn because it ain't a longnose. Pure longnose very rarely exceed 60" long--the state record fish was 72". We see hybrids that long commonly. Fish that are much longer than 60" are invariably a hybrid.
There are a few other record fish in the IGFA database that are "fishy" as well. Most of the records are at or below 60", but then there's one that's 69" and with a very odd length to weight ratio. Hoping to get photographs of all of the longnose record fish and see if we can't get a hybrid category in the IGFA database, because no one will ever break the 50 lb longnose record unless we're counting hybrids as longnose. Good luck getting it changed! The IGFA has a lot of biologist on it's staff who are all over the world. Just like anything else I am sure you have a biologist who will dispute the IGFA's biologist. Who is one to believe in ? My guess the IGFA! Well, it's a hybrid, indisputable. We have a mountain of evidence to show this. They photo of the record fish is unequivocally a hybrid, it looks nothing like a pure longnose and exactly like dozens of examples of AG x LNG hybrid gar. And the "biologist" is the world authority on gar, a PhD ichthyologist professor with international reputation. Not some fisheries biologist with master's degree. I don't disagree that they might not make the change, but it won't be based on facts. FYI, the all-tackle longnose gar IGFA record has been reclassified as a hybrid, just as I said it was. I was responsible for getting this record changed, along with 2 other scientists who study gar. IGFA All-tackle longose gar now classified as a hybrid
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|