I protest Europe and Asia being considered two separate continents. I think it's based entirely on 20th century political and cultural differences and has nothing to do with geography.

Hardly anyone agrees on where the boundary is. A continental boundary shouldn't be subjective, it should be obvious, or it doesn't exist.

How would you define the Europe-Asia boundary? Black Sea? Caspian Sea? Caucus Mountains? Ural Mountains?

None of those boundaries make sense to me, I think it should be one continent. What do you think?

It’s all one world man.

Draw the line, where the eyes start to slant.

I saw both in concert.

Eskimos in North America have epicanthic folds.

I would use the Ural mountsuns and the Volga river as a north-south line. But if we do that, we could also split Norh America into 3 continents.

That would totally jack up the game of Risk.

Terrible bands...

I hereby declare it Eurasia!!

Asia was pretty tight in the 80's

There was something different about that Eurasia band, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Did you know that the Apaches/Navajo are considered to be an offshoot segment of the Athabaskans (Alaskan tribes). Many similar language nuances. And the Athabascans came from Asia (Siberia)

Migration can throw a monkey wrench in that "slant eye" theory.

https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/navajo.htm

https://www.aaanativearts.com/athabaskan-peoples

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/scie...hidden-languages-spoken-today-180950053/

Yes, the first Americans were Russians.