I read where Bill Belichick has said all plays should be subject to challenge including penalties or no calls. You would still have the same amount of challenges but you could challenge any play for review. To me that makes the most sense for a play like this and would have corrected the no call.

What if Peyton had used up all his challenges? They would still be crying.

There is pass interference on almost every play. Certainly a penalty on about every play. Some may be away from the ball. So could you challenge a hold, pass interferenc etc on any big game changing play?

What if Peyton had used up all his challenges? They would still be crying.

There is pass interference on almost every play. Certainly a penalty on about every play. Some may be away from the ball. So could you challenge a hold, pass interferenc etc on any big game changing play?

If the Saints wouldn't have blown a 13-0 lead at home and went better than 2 for 5 in the red zone, this would hardly be a issue. Yes it was a bad call but they had their chances and let them get away.

^This is a better way of saying what I was thinking...Fishspanker touched on it too. I�m a big fan of taking accountability where accountability should be taken...control what you can control.

I get the point, but I disagree with it to an extent. Could they have done more to win? Sure. If the correct call is made, they would have won, so they did do enough to win except for an egregious missed call that everyone agrees was a foul.

And until changes (like you and others suggested) are made, the �egregious missed calls that everyone agrees is a foul� can, and will, continue to happen. I would just want my team (if I were the coach) to spend time working on things they can do (and could have done) to win despite the horrible call.

You said yourself that they could have done more to win. My energy would be spent against doing that. There�s no value in complaining about the bad call that cost you a trip to the Super Bowl.

And until changes (like you and others suggested) are made, the �egregious missed calls that everyone agrees is a foul� can, and will, continue to happen. I would just want my team (if I were the coach) to spend time working on things they can do (and could have done) to win despite the horrible call.

You said yourself that they could have done more to win. My energy would be spent against doing that. There�s no value in complaining about the bad call that cost you a trip to the Super Bowl.
The other team happens to be a pro football team as well, don't put that they should have done more to win stuff up there, they did get a 13-0 lead early in the game, they did put themselves in position to win the game but a bad no call kept them from ending the game right then and there, the bottom line is there was a flagrant no call penalty, it was actually 3 penalties in one, there is just no way that call cannot be made, the Rams should have lost the game, there is no other way to spin it.

Except, even without doing more, they still should have won. I get the point that they had more chances to win, but they did enough to win if the most obvious pass interference and hit to the head of all time is called.

They did enough to win and got screwed.