Forums59
Topics1,152,697
Posts15,746,303
Members143,065
|
Most Online36,273 Jan 23rd, 2013
|
|
Abrazx vs invizx
#13008519
12/29/18 01:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,190
rxkid2001
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,190 |
Is there that much difference in abrazx and invizx? Only Seaguar opinions please, I’ve tried sunline.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008538
12/29/18 01:53 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 18,797
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 18,797 |
Less memory on InvisX, more abrasion resistance with AbrazX.
InvisX is great for most conditions.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008560
12/29/18 02:07 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502
Flooringit
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502 |
2013 Phoenix 920xp
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008694
12/29/18 03:33 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 225
JWalls
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 225 |
My experience was different than Flooringit. I like to use the Abrazx for my Texas rigs when fishing the cedar bushes on Squaw. I found it got shredder slower than the Invisx when pulling worm over the limbs. Do not have to retie as often. If I catch a good one coming over a limb I retie anyway. 20 lb seemed to be break about the same on either when just pulling on a hang up with a fresh knot. Could drag the boat to it if did not pull quick to snap it. If I was fishing a grass lake I would use the Invisx. Cast better and less memory.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008815
12/29/18 05:31 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,005
Big Swimbait
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,005 |
Agree with the memory issues stated above, but when I saw J. Lee catch that 100 lb Sturgeon on 8lb Abrazx on Zona's TV show, I switched.
Less gritchin', more fishin'
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008834
12/29/18 06:17 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,217
B.Hollingshead
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,217 |
AbrazX with KVD line conditioner
Branden Hollingshead
38-DD's and counting
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13008890
12/29/18 12:04 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 512
wagonwheel
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 512 |
I use Invizx on all my poles. I have never had a problem.
![[Linked Image]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Fishing/i-dCcqXnd/0/0f809ca2/Th/Wife8.6-Th.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Fishing/i-2cFJdP6/0/45059bd6/Th/IMG_0489-Th.jpg) Hey--we finally caught one! dwjimages.smugmug.com
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13009114
12/29/18 03:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,653
Bruce Allen
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,653 |
even though I fish in a lake full of structure the Invizx has never caused me to loose a fish
Lake Fork Anglers Every Thursday Daytime Tournaments. Lake Fork Sportsman's Association www.lakeforksa.com/We are VERY PROUD of our Induction into the Texas Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13009291
12/29/18 05:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,480
Bayou Burner
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,480 |
I switched to Abrazx from Invisix recently-Like others have mentioned, the Abrazx is way more abrasion resistant compared to the other. Not much more memory than the invizix either. Lasts longer too. I use Sunline Assassin also, very comparable imo.
"Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway."
John Wayne
ADHAERO VIRTUTI
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: wagonwheel]
#13009327
12/29/18 05:56 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,051
the skipper
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,051 |
I use Invizx on all my poles. I have never had a problem. Me to.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: rxkid2001]
#13009376
12/29/18 06:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 385
BigBassB
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 385 |
Just like anything else they both have their place depending on the technique. Invisx has more stretch and works great for moving baits like crankbaits. Abrazx is more sensitive with less stretch and works great for jigs and such.
|
|
Re: Abrazx vs invizx
[Re: SteezMacQueen]
#13011912
12/31/18 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,083
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,083 |
Less memory on InvisX, more abrasion resistance with AbrazX.
InvisX is great for most conditions. +1 I also like Berkley 100%, it is more like AbrasX to me only larger diameter for same pound test.
Last edited by Ken A.; 12/31/18 04:19 PM.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek ðŸ, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|