texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Kingnutin, elisepeda, 603bass, MDWesttex, fatdad74
109175 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 89,998
hopalong 78,901
Pilothawk 77,370
John175® 69,687
JDavis7873® 67,392
Derek 🐝 61,601
Tritonman 58,356
LoneStarSon® 54,782
Mark Perry 54,421
facebook
Forum Statistics
Forums60
Topics775,273
Posts12,974,997
Members109,175
Most Online36,273
Jan 23rd, 2013
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules #12034056
01/11/17 02:10 PM
01/11/17 02:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Austin
Aubry Buzek Offline OP
Green Horn
Aubry Buzek  Offline OP
Green Horn

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 4
Austin
The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) is seeking public comment on proposed changes to the regulations on the possession and sale of gizzard and threadfin shad collected from public waters, which would require persons who collect or possess shad in excess of certain limits to obtain a permit.

TPWD currently issues permits for the sale of nongame fishes taken from public waters, which includes gizzard and threadfin shad sold as live, frozen, or prepared bait. Some permittees also collect live shad from public reservoirs for sale or as part of management services provided to private pond owners to increase the abundance of prey fishes in a pond and improve the growth and size of fish such as largemouth bass.

Shad are also collected by private landowners to stock as prey in their private lakes. These persons are currently not required to obtain a permit because no sale is involved, but the proposed changes would require persons who use containers exceeding 82 quarts in volume for collection and possession of shad from public fresh waters to obtain a $60 permit to possess or sell nongame fish.

A permit would continue to be required if the shad collected are sold or exchanged for anything of value regardless of the container size used, but no permit would be required if the shad are used only as bait on the water body where they were collected, or if a licensed fishing guide possesses and furnishes the shad as bait to customers as part of the guide’s services.

Collection of shad, especially threadfin shad, has resulted in substantial quantities being harvested from some reservoirs in the state, according to Ken Kurzawski, TPWD Inland Fisheries Director of Information and Regulations. Although the impacts on fishes in the reservoirs where these activities occur appear to be minimal at this time, requiring a permit for activities that can result in substantial harvest will allow the department to more fully monitor these activities to ensure their sustainability.

The department is also proposing additional minor changes to the permits such as providing for up to eight persons to be named on a permit as assistants and incorporating procedures into the permit requirements for reducing the spread of invasive aquatic species such as zebra mussels.

Proposed rules are available for review in the Dec. 23, 2016 issue of the Texas Register.

Public comment may be made online; by phone or email to Ken Kurzawski at (512) 389-4591, ken.kurzawski@tpwd.texas.gov; or in person during the TPWD Commission meeting on Jan. 26 at 9 a.m. at 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744.


Aubry Buzek, TPWD Press Office
https://tpwd.texas.gov/newsmedia/releases/
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12034743
01/11/17 07:46 PM
01/11/17 07:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 257
Cedar Creek, Texas
M
MBDLAW Offline
Angler
MBDLAW  Offline
Angler
M

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 257
Cedar Creek, Texas
how many shad are "collected" by the thousands of cormorants which are protected for no reason whatsoever...


MBD
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12037636
01/13/17 11:33 AM
01/13/17 11:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,459
Temple, TX.
T
T Bird Offline
TFF Celebrity
T Bird  Offline
TFF Celebrity
T

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,459
Temple, TX.
What about the Tilapia netters?

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: MBDLAW] #12040282
01/15/17 12:06 AM
01/15/17 12:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 644
Tyler, Texas
Slefler Offline
Pro Angler
Slefler  Offline
Pro Angler

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 644
Tyler, Texas
Originally Posted By: MBDLAW
how many shad are "collected" by the thousands of cormorants which are protected for no reason whatsoever...


+1 all because they're a "migratory species"

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12043614
01/16/17 03:00 PM
01/16/17 03:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,411
F
Fishingking Offline
Extreme Angler
Fishingking  Offline
Extreme Angler
F

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,411
Money is all you need to say it's about.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12043938
01/16/17 06:41 PM
01/16/17 06:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,385
Brazoria County, Texas
F
Fishbreeder Offline
Extreme Angler
Fishbreeder  Offline
Extreme Angler
F

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,385
Brazoria County, Texas
Neither species should be collected from public fisheries for sale to stock private waters. Period.

The spread of potentially extremely harmful pathogens (such as LMBHV, KHV, CCVD, ESC, and many others) is just one of many dangers involved in such activity.

Of concern is also the spread of undesirable exotic species found in these waters (ie. zebra mussels, hydrilla, hyacinth, salvinia, tilapia, etc.)

Of less, but still real, concern is the potential over-utilization of a public resource by private entities

These concerns are not an issue for these species if properly farm raised in a controlled environment.


Fishbreeder


Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12044958
01/17/17 10:49 AM
01/17/17 10:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,664
Euless
M
Muzzlebrake Offline
Extreme Angler
Muzzlebrake  Offline
Extreme Angler
M

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,664
Euless
Won't be long before we will need a license to breath. Yep without it you can no longer use air that belongs to the state. People will be running a hose pipe across the Red River and stealing Oklahoma air.

Last edited by Muzzlebrake; 01/17/17 10:50 AM.

From Genesis: "And God promised men that good and obedient wives would be found in all corners of the earth."

Then He made the earth round...and He laughed and laughed and laughed!

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Fishbreeder] #12046497
01/18/17 06:07 AM
01/18/17 06:07 AM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,960
Texas
B
Brad R Offline
Extreme Angler
Brad R  Offline
Extreme Angler
B

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,960
Texas
Originally Posted By: Fishbreeder
Neither species should be collected from public fisheries for sale to stock private waters. Period.

The spread of potentially extremely harmful pathogens (such as LMBHV, KHV, CCVD, ESC, and many others) is just one of many dangers involved in such activity.

Of concern is also the spread of undesirable exotic species found in these waters (ie. zebra mussels, hydrilla, hyacinth, salvinia, tilapia, etc.)

Of less, but still real, concern is the potential over-utilization of a public resource by private entities

These concerns are not an issue for these species if properly farm raised in a controlled environment.



I generally agree with Fishbreeder that harvesting anything out of our lakes, excepting dinner table fare, well it opens up all sorts of odd biological possibilities. Kudzu, Johnson Grass, fire ants and other intruders come to mind.

No, this will NOT affect many, if any of us. If anyone is out there collecting shad for personal fishing purposes, as long as the amount is less than 82 quarts, no permits are required. 82 quarts? That is a common available size for larger coolers; so, I suppose that is the 'why' behind that particular number.

And, the use of a volume measurement is owing to the fact that putting a head count on individual shad swimming around is not practical, uncountable really so TPWD will go by container volume instead.

TPWD goes on to say that these new rules (there are several) will only affect 10 or so small businesses statewide.

I'm all in. I'd go a bit farther. Net a bunch of shad from a lake with tilapia and accidentally pick up a few, drop them in a private pond, a flood occurs, they end up in a south Texas lake? One year later, you'd have 10,000 tilapia.

Brad

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Fishbreeder] #12047293
01/18/17 12:24 PM
01/18/17 12:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 18,974
Flower Mound, TX
Hard Rain Online happy
TFF Guru
Hard Rain  Online Happy
TFF Guru

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 18,974
Flower Mound, TX
Originally Posted By: Fishbreeder
Neither species should be collected from public fisheries for sale to stock private waters. Period.

The spread of potentially extremely harmful pathogens (such as LMBHV, KHV, CCVD, ESC, and many others) is just one of many dangers involved in such activity.

Of concern is also the spread of undesirable exotic species found in these waters (ie. zebra mussels, hydrilla, hyacinth, salvinia, tilapia, etc.)

Of less, but still real, concern is the potential over-utilization of a public resource by private entities

These concerns are not an issue for these species if properly farm raised in a controlled environment.



IMO shad should not be taken from one lake and used for bait in another for the exact reasons you list.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12049107
01/19/17 12:49 PM
01/19/17 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,216
South Texas
Jimbo Online content
TFF Guru
Jimbo  Online Content
TFF Guru

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,216
South Texas
It's about the money, and just another form of (fee) taxation.
If it would go toward stocking the lakes fine, but most likely it's to help pay for all those office workers and bonuses.
They have a hard time enforcing the laws already, and adding another makes no sense unless you look at the reason I stated above.

Last edited by Jimbo; 01/19/17 12:51 PM.

Just one more cast!

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Jimbo] #12049141
01/19/17 01:08 PM
01/19/17 01:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,960
Texas
B
Brad R Offline
Extreme Angler
Brad R  Offline
Extreme Angler
B

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,960
Texas
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
It's about the money, and just another form of (fee) taxation.
If it would go toward stocking the lakes fine, but most likely it's to help pay for all those office workers and bonuses.
They have a hard time enforcing the laws already, and adding another makes no sense unless you look at the reason I stated above.


Jimbo, no, I don't think this one has to do with revenue collection. If they are correct and it only affects 10 or so small operations, I believe the fee is about $60, so 10 X 60 = $600.

I think this one has more to do with simple management of our resources, possibly issues related to the spread of disease, and so forth.

Generally, though, with most government agencies, I totally agree with your sentiment . . . that they are just looking for opportunities to regulate and tax.

Brad

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12050890
01/20/17 11:30 AM
01/20/17 11:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,085
D
dmunsie Online content
Extreme Angler
dmunsie  Online Content
Extreme Angler
D

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,085
I agree, this (so far) doesn't seem like a money grab at all.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12058985
01/25/17 09:41 AM
01/25/17 09:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 708
DFW
G
gray Offline
Pro Angler
gray  Offline
Pro Angler
G

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 708
DFW
How would you obtain this permit? Can I purchase this and other special lisence and permits at the same places I buy a hunting and fishing lisence? Or do I have to order by mail or online?

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12059078
01/25/17 10:33 AM
01/25/17 10:33 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,831
Mineola, formerly Arlington
C
Curt0407 Online content
TFF Celebrity
Curt0407  Online Content
TFF Celebrity
C

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,831
Mineola, formerly Arlington
This seems to be an issue that is not that big of a deal. It is hard for me to envision any sport fisherman using anywhere near 82 quarts of shad at a time. I don't think many cat fisherman would be placed under a hardship due to this limit.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12059180
01/25/17 11:31 AM
01/25/17 11:31 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 708
DFW
G
gray Offline
Pro Angler
gray  Offline
Pro Angler
G

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 708
DFW
Just to clarify, the new rule would regulate the use of containers exceeding 82 quarts, not 82 quarts of shad.

"would require persons who use containers exceeding 82 quarts in volume for collection and possession of shad from public fresh waters to obtain a $60 permit to possess or sell nongame fish."

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12059568
01/25/17 02:39 PM
01/25/17 02:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,015
Plano,Tx, USA
M
mstewart Offline
Extreme Angler
mstewart  Offline
Extreme Angler
M

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,015
Plano,Tx, USA
82 quarts is only 20.5 gallons.
For fishing, who can (in their automobile) land transport "Shad" in a livewell that is only 20.5 gallons small??
Most Shad capable bait tanks are 25, 30, even 40 gallons.
that would only transport a little more than a couple dozen shad, and that wouldn't make it through the day in a 20.5 gallon tank.

I have a wonderful 20 gallon Sunshine tank that I use for shad. I also have 2 - 30 gallon sunshine bait tanks, a 50,30, 17 gallon Kodiak tanks. More tanks than I need, I just don't want to get rid of them.

Since you can't transport Shad out of Lewisville up to Texoma anymore, I don't try to transport bait by truck (just get their early, or use artificials).

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12085219
02/09/17 07:51 AM
02/09/17 07:51 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,693
Medina lake
C
Catfish-hunter Offline
Extreme Angler
Catfish-hunter  Offline
Extreme Angler
C

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,693
Medina lake
Doesn't this kind of go back to the drain your livewells when you leave the lake and all live bait must be commercially bought with proof of receipt? Or whatever the law really is? Commercial fishing has a license,commercial non game also. Leave the landowners alone. If they bring home something bad into their lake,they will take responsibility for it and handle it,or quit doing it. I never heard of anyone bringing shad home alive from a lake to stock your own. Now I have heard of bringing perch home...

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12087243
02/10/17 10:10 AM
02/10/17 10:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,569
Kaufman
P
psycho0819 Offline
Extreme Angler
psycho0819  Offline
Extreme Angler
P

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,569
Kaufman
Looks like a solution looking for a problem to me. Seriously, let's see some hard data on the impacts that TPWD wishes to mitigate with this new tax on fishermen.


If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12094289
02/14/17 05:27 PM
02/14/17 05:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,837
Austin, Tx
B
Bob Landry Offline
Extreme Angler
Bob Landry  Offline
Extreme Angler
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,837
Austin, Tx
Anytime any government entity opens a subject up for "Town Hall" discussion, they have already decided what's going to happen and it's just a feel good dog & pony show for those who believe their opinions matter to the rule makers.


2015 Seaark 1872 MV CC Etec-90
Two Helix 12 CHIRP SI's, , MinnKota Riptide ST80/i-pilot Link, Bob's Hydraulic
2018 Robalo R180 CC, Yamaha 115

Bitter Gun Owner
Bitter Clinger
Armed Infidel
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12126113
03/06/17 06:32 AM
03/06/17 06:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 176
Texas
jp24 Online content
Outdoorsman
jp24  Online Content
Outdoorsman

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 176
Texas
Hate over-regulation but this makes sense.
Cormorant issue needs to be addressed as well. They are like giant wolf packs on CC, and in no way seem part of the natural ecosystem.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Bob Landry] #12126472
03/06/17 09:13 AM
03/06/17 09:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,600
Hill county
L
Legend LE-195 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Legend LE-195  Offline
TFF Team Angler
L

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,600
Hill county
Originally Posted By: Bob Landry
Anytime any government entity opens a subject up for "Town Hall" discussion, they have already decided what's going to happen and it's just a feel good dog & pony show for those who believe their opinions matter to the rule makers.
Not always the case, research grayson county and them trying to open up a rifle deer season there, the bowhunters came out in force at the town hall against it and stopped it.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12127156
03/06/17 01:43 PM
03/06/17 01:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
C
crapicat Offline
TFF Celebrity
crapicat  Offline
TFF Celebrity
C

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
They need to forget this idea...bad Public relations move...all it will really do is give TPW employees more opportunity to harass the average citizen that otherwise is hurting/bothering nobody. If they just realize they are giving themselves the appearance of being the gesthapo...maybe the would forget this bunch of hairbrained ideas...it reminds me that they once wanted to regulate the collection of skunk scent...really? Anyone brave enough should be allowed to do it without being hassled by the TPW. I hope y'all are listening TPW...stop the hairbrained ideas...you look like idiots enough without these senseless regulations.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: psycho0819] #12127159
03/06/17 01:46 PM
03/06/17 01:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
C
crapicat Offline
TFF Celebrity
crapicat  Offline
TFF Celebrity
C

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
Originally Posted By: psycho0819
Looks like a solution looking for a problem to me. Seriously, let's see some hard data on the impacts that TPWD wishes to mitigate with this new tax on fishermen.


I agree wholeheartedly...they believe they can gain fee income with no additional cost burden. But their is a cost to senslesss regulation...public perception...only negative here.

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Brad R] #12127171
03/06/17 01:49 PM
03/06/17 01:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
C
crapicat Offline
TFF Celebrity
crapicat  Offline
TFF Celebrity
C

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,615
Grandview, TX
Originally Posted By: Brad R
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
It's about the money, and just another form of (fee) taxation.
If it would go toward stocking the lakes fine, but most likely it's to help pay for all those office workers and bonuses.
They have a hard time enforcing the laws already, and adding another makes no sense unless you look at the reason I stated above.


Jimbo, no, I don't think this one has to do with revenue collection. If they are correct and it only affects 10 or so small operations, I believe the fee is about $60, so 10 X 60 = $600.

I think this one has more to do with simple management of our resources, possibly issues related to the spread of disease, and so forth.

Generally, though, with most government agencies, I totally agree with your sentiment . . . that they are just looking for opportunities to regulate and tax.

Brad


No this is just the first step in the process to restricting any/all shad gathering activities.

Furthermore, if it only affects 10 or so small operation, then find another way to deal with them and not affect 100,000 or more after implementation...just saying KISS method is better than this proposal!

Last edited by crapicat; 03/08/17 09:09 AM.
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Slefler] #12156972
03/24/17 07:25 PM
03/24/17 07:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,402
Red Oak, Galveston, and Pagosa...
S
SteezMacQueen Online sleepy
TFF Celebrity
SteezMacQueen  Online Sleepy
TFF Celebrity
S

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,402
Red Oak, Galveston, and Pagosa...
Originally Posted By: Slefler
Originally Posted By: MBDLAW
how many shad are "collected" by the thousands of cormorants which are protected for no reason whatsoever...


+1 all because they're a "migratory species"


Haha....they migrate up and down the bank.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12180990
04/03/17 03:39 PM
04/03/17 03:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 144
Carrollton, Texas
D
DancesWithSquirrels Offline
Outdoorsman
DancesWithSquirrels  Offline
Outdoorsman
D

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 144
Carrollton, Texas
Don't y'all just love TPWD sometimes????

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12205172
04/18/17 11:51 AM
04/18/17 11:51 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
R
River Mongrel Offline
Extreme Angler
River Mongrel  Offline
Extreme Angler
R

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
Where and when?


Keep em tight!
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: jp24] #12232344
05/05/17 09:11 AM
05/05/17 09:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 255
Cedar Creek Lake
T
TinRangerJim Offline
Angler
TinRangerJim  Offline
Angler
T

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 255
Cedar Creek Lake
Originally Posted By: jp24
Hate over-regulation but this makes sense.
Cormorant issue needs to be addressed as well. They are like giant wolf packs on CC, and in no way seem part of the natural ecosystem.

Unfortunately, Cormorants have been a federally protected species since 1918 when they were included in the original Migratory Bird Treaty between the United States and Canada. Since then, Mexico, Japan and Russia have become parties to the treaty. So unless the Feds get involved, we're stuck with them mad


"Rip Some Lips"
Nevadan by birth, Texan by choice
Jim C.
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12264637
05/26/17 02:39 PM
05/26/17 02:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 454
Fort Worth
S
SwampyMan Offline
Angler
SwampyMan  Offline
Angler
S

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 454
Fort Worth
Bump

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12276919
06/03/17 01:14 PM
06/03/17 01:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
E
eyeball Offline
Outdoorsman
eyeball  Offline
Outdoorsman
E

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Cormorants only take the old and weak. smirk

As an old fart i remember tpwd telling that many years ago. Bass clubs raised hell so they did a study to prove they only ate trash.

The results were so disturbing bass groups had to file suit to get them to release the results.

When they go through a cove, they clean it out.


Give a man a fish, feed him for a day.

Teach a man to fish, he will sit in a boat all day and drink beer.
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12292357
06/13/17 03:26 PM
06/13/17 03:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 557
Bosque County, Texas
L
Lloyd5 Offline
Pro Angler
Lloyd5  Offline
Pro Angler
L

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 557
Bosque County, Texas
Taking publicly owned fish and putting them in private waters is a form of theft of public property, mild form maybe, but still, those fish belong to the public. There should be a $ amount paid for those shad that are taken to private water. The $ should go back into the public treasury. If a permit fee is the way to do it, then fine, set a permit fee and enforce it.

This is similar to high fencing private property to keep the publicly owned deer trapped inside so they can then sell those deer.


Texas State Editor: FishExplorer http://www.fishexplorer.com/tx

http://www.amazon.com/River-Proceeds-Wou...ds=on+the+river

Warm Water Fly Fishing Nut
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12322283
07/03/17 12:02 PM
07/03/17 12:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
R
River Mongrel Offline
Extreme Angler
River Mongrel  Offline
Extreme Angler
R

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
Extremely small % of folks take fish from public waters and "steal" them. So punish all of us? LLoyd5 great job. You must be a Bernie fan.


Keep em tight!
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: River Mongrel] #12323209
07/04/17 03:51 AM
07/04/17 03:51 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 557
Bosque County, Texas
L
Lloyd5 Offline
Pro Angler
Lloyd5  Offline
Pro Angler
L

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 557
Bosque County, Texas
Originally Posted By: River Mongrel
Extremely small % of folks take fish from public waters and "steal" them. So punish all of us? LLoyd5 great job. You must be a Bernie fan.


Do what? Where in the world did you get that?


Texas State Editor: FishExplorer http://www.fishexplorer.com/tx

http://www.amazon.com/River-Proceeds-Wou...ds=on+the+river

Warm Water Fly Fishing Nut
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12324749
07/05/17 09:38 AM
07/05/17 09:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
R
River Mongrel Offline
Extreme Angler
River Mongrel  Offline
Extreme Angler
R

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,410
You want to tax everyone because a few people take advantage of a resource.


Keep em tight!
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: River Mongrel] #12326985
07/06/17 02:57 PM
07/06/17 02:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 30
Samiam90 Offline
Outdoorsman
Samiam90  Offline
Outdoorsman

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 30
What is punishing about that? You would only have to pay if you were taking shad from public waters for private water stocking. Everyone pays for a fishing license to maintain public water ecosystems. People who relocate shad are just taking money out of that pot, right?

Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Samiam90] #12331908
07/10/17 07:12 AM
07/10/17 07:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 330
Ray Roberts
R
Reynolds Guide Service Offline
Angler
Reynolds Guide Service  Offline
Angler
R

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 330
Ray Roberts
Originally Posted By: Samiam90
What is punishing about that? You would only have to pay if you were taking shad from public waters for private water stocking. Everyone pays for a fishing license to maintain public water ecosystems. People who relocate shad are just taking money out of that pot, right?

No, not everyone purchases a fishing license to fish. People who fish inside the Texas state parks are allowed to fish without purchasing a fishing license. I do not agree with this policy. Let everyone purchase a fishing license. Everyone 17 and older. The state is loosing lots of money on weekends and holidays with this policy. Then asking for donations.

Last edited by Reynolds Guide Service; 07/10/17 08:09 AM.
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12354797
07/23/17 05:27 PM
07/23/17 05:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 200
Winnsboro, TX.
J
jfred Offline
Outdoorsman
jfred  Offline
Outdoorsman
J

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 200
Winnsboro, TX.
this is just another pay the state more money scheme , just like when rick perry was governor and he raised the price of fishing and hunting license saying all the money was going to go to the parks and wildlife dept. to build fish hatcheries and fund wildlife stocking and all the good [censored] we want to hear , only after all his [censored] was implemented our trustworthy politicians voted to run the money into the general fund so they can squander it off to their stupid [censored] that has nothing to do with what they said it would be used for.


Jim Frederick Construction, all types of home construction & remodeling , boat houses & docks , retaining walls
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Bob Landry] #12386005
08/14/17 06:00 PM
08/14/17 06:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,312
Hitchcock,Tx.
V-Bottom Online content
Extreme Angler
V-Bottom  Online Content
Extreme Angler

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,312
Hitchcock,Tx.
Originally Posted By: Bob Landry
Anytime any government entity opens a subject up for "Town Hall" discussion, they have already decided what's going to happen and it's just a feel good dog & pony show for those who believe their opinions matter to the rule makers.


Absolutely agree....It's mandatory to have this BS session....Your opinion doesn't matter... I believe they have made up their minds already. It's just a Paper Trail....got to have that!!


Texas Anglers Recognition Program
TPWD Official Weigh Station,77563
Coastal Bend Weigh Team, Cert. Weigh Master
USMC66'- www.troutsupport.com




Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Aubry Buzek] #12494378
11/06/17 02:39 PM
11/06/17 02:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 136
Rusk County, Garrison, Texas
Larry Mosby Offline
Outdoorsman
Larry Mosby  Offline
Outdoorsman

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 136
Rusk County, Garrison, Texas
So if all water must be drained from a vessel and minnows released into the waters one is fishing before leaving, unless one has a receipt for the minnows from a merchant. Then how could anyone legally leave a body of water transporting shad in water to use in another resale or not? It seems to me this practice contradicts current laws and should be considered illegal.


Larry Mosby
Re: TPWD Taking Public Comment on Proposed Shad Collection Rules [Re: Jimbo] #12494455
11/06/17 04:03 PM
11/06/17 04:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,167
Magnolia, TX
F
Flippin-Out Offline
Extreme Angler
Flippin-Out  Offline
Extreme Angler
F

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,167
Magnolia, TX
Originally Posted By: Jimbo
It's about the money, and just another form of (fee) taxation.
If it would go toward stocking the lakes fine, but most likely it's to help pay for all those office workers and bonuses.
They have a hard time enforcing the laws already, and adding another makes no sense unless you look at the reason I stated above.


Now, now, Jimbo. Here's what the announcement states:

"....requiring a permit for activities that can result in substantial harvest will allow the department to more fully monitor these activities to ensure their sustainability". See?

Oops! Wait....if the goal is to MONITOR activities (specifically by requiring the permit and thereby knowing who's doing the larger scale operations), how come they are charging $60? I'm sure there are administrative costs to having that permit system, so let's say they need $5 to cover that. Boom, done. Now they can monitor those who are collecting shad in 82+ quart containers and all is well because legit harvesters do have a permit just the same, right? Nooo, TPWD needs your $60! Can you spell "tax"?

I do not like this, but not because I wish to protect a few commercial operators. (The state claims about 10 are affected.) Shad are difficult to keep alive, and hard to catch at times. Numerous, true sport-only guys make a bait-trip just to catch shad to hold overnight for a planned fishing trip the next day. A bunch of those guys have already purchased round specialty bait tanks larger than 82 quarts to increase bait survival until they use it up. Those tanks were expensive. Now they'd have to get rid of it and buy a smaller one, or pay $60 per year. This, all because they do a few big trips each year where they gather bait one day to use on the same lake the next day. I DO NOT go for the typical TPWD-lazy "If you have a tank larger than 82 quart then you must be in business" mentality of this proposed rule. You're essentially guilty of possessing one container vs. another - even if there were only 20 shad it it! Really? I don't even own a typical shad tank, but I should be free to own whatever size I would like for my private fishing IF I FEEL INCLINED to do so.

The concern is stated to be the commercial use of the resource. Then let them make a regulation addressing just that. Leave the sportsman alone. Don't make an enthusiastic sportsman who fuels the economy via his purchases (boat, expensive tank, etc.) into a criminal simply because he holds a few pounds of shad in a large tank instead of a smaller one.

Last edited by Flippin-Out; 11/06/17 04:15 PM.
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread


© 1998-2018 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
UBB.threads™ 7.6.2