THIS is what I mean when I tell folks "They (PETA and other AR types) are after you're lifestyle and your hobbies and not just hunting and fishing."
I posted a story of one of my more recent conflicts with PETA here...
http://texasfishingforum.com/forums/ubbt...e_cringi#UNREADWhile I agree with trying to minimize PETA's presence on the web, I also believe you fight ignorance by casting light into darkness with knowledge and understanding.
Some years back an avid tournament fishing friend called one Saturday from East Texas where PETA had put out a press release and the local radio and tv took it up as "news" that they had, "Poured fish tranquilizer into the lake so that the fish would not bite during the tournament."
I was busy at the time but told my buddy, "Call the news and counter with this, 1) There is not enough fish tranquilizer in the world to do that entire lake, 2) Natural (clove oil) or manufactured (tricaine methanesulfonate) enough of any fish tranquilizer to affect the fish would be a pollution incident of gigantic proportions so it would never be allowed and would be vigorously prosecuted, 3) We've dealt with these idiots before, consider the source."
Which he did and the tournament went on without a hitch.
One PETA argument against fishing is "Sharp hooks hurt the fish." What d'ya s'pose happens to a bass' mouth when it eats a sunfish, tilapia, crawfish or other spiny prey item? This type predator is highly suited to that type of lifestyle damage from simply eating and heals very quickly from such minor wounds.
I've fought these people over the right to ship live fish (pet koi) by air cargo, to have leather seats in my truck, sell fish I raised for bait, display fish in tanks and ponds in public places, even to just go and fish myself at the local jetty.
They are well funded, highly organized, and have a following. Best take them seriously.