Forums59
Topics1,038,933
Posts13,955,773
Members144,183
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
I need a simple explanation
#10906284
06/09/15 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,416
Andrew Taylor
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,416 |
What the heck is the difference in mono and fluro? Sounds rookie but i'm dying to know.. any simple explanations?
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10906289
06/09/15 09:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,725
Chris_K
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,725 |
Mono floats and has some stretch to it Fluoro has less stretch and sinks
Last edited by It's a giant!; 06/09/15 09:25 PM.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10906387
06/09/15 10:09 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 883
Bill Durham
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 883 |
mono is made from nylon.. hence the stretch. Fluorocarbon is more like glass fiber.. hence less stretch. It has a much higher surface tension, hence the scalding when you tie knots if you don't wet it before you cinch it down.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10906410
06/09/15 10:21 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,443
KB1953
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,443 |
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10906414
06/09/15 10:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
It sinks and it stretches actually more than you think. Better sensitivity
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: KB1953]
#10906441
06/09/15 10:32 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 256
FACSR
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 256 |
About $15.00 dollars more per spool than mono
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10907317
06/10/15 04:08 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 133
Kevin D.
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 133 |
And, fluorocarbon has a heck of memory. Backlashes will make dirty words flow freely from your mouth when you get done untangling everything, if you get done untangling everything. I hate fluorocarbon.
Kevin D.
Every day above ground is a good day... A day on the water; even better.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10909108
06/10/15 08:34 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 342
Garvin
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 342 |
One of the biggest attractions of fluorocarbon line is that it has a refractive index close to that of water. Essentially, submerging it renders it nearly invisible to the eye, although it is speculated that bass can probably still detect the movement of the line through the water with their lateral lines.
Just ONCE I'd like for someone to call me "Sir" without adding, "please stop making a scene.""The problem with quotes on the internet is having to ascertain whether or not they are genuine." -- Abraham Lincoln
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Rudy Lackey]
#10909131
06/10/15 08:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,390
Andrew Y'Barbo
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,390 |
Not if you use good line with a good knot.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10909148
06/10/15 08:43 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,181
JacksonBean
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,181 |
What the heck is the difference in mono and fluro? Sounds rookie but i'm dying to know.. any simple explanations? Let me complicate the matter as best I can. Fluoro is mono. Mono means made of a single strand. Resin mono is what is typically referred to as monofilament. Fluorocarbon line is also made of a single strand just not of resin. It's a big two dollar word that I won't trouble you with. Resin mono typically floats but it also gets water logged. People typically like it because it's the best bang for your buck. It's cheaply made in other words. Once it gets water logged, it is prone to abrasions and loses some of it's good characteristics. Fluoro mono sinks, is stronger, has less stretch, but costs significantly more. As stated.... Grrreat refractive index for clear water environments. That's the quick and dirty version.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10909602
06/11/15 12:22 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,509
Slade
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,509 |
Good floro is the way to go IMO. It is less visible, much more sensitive. Yes it has memory. I use line conditioner and stretch my lines every few weeks or before a trip. I pretty much just use floro or braid on all of my rigs. I had one or two with mono that I would use for top water but I don't use them that much. Most of the top water applications can be done with braid or 12# floro.
PB 10.58 Joe Pool
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Garvin]
#10909610
06/11/15 12:26 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650
senko9S
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650 |
One of the biggest attractions of fluorocarbon line is that it has a refractive index close to that of water. Essentially, submerging it renders it nearly invisible to the eye, although it is speculated that bass can probably still detect the movement of the line through the water with their lateral lines. its a good selling point on the box but I can see both the same in a crystal clear aquarium under all light conditions with my own eyes.
|
|
Re: I need a simple explanation
[Re: Andrew Taylor]
#10909636
06/11/15 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,702
Frenzy
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,702 |
I like some fluoro's, others not so much. Invisx stretchs like a mono and is not very sensitive imo. The stiffer fluoro's, like 100% trilene, have less stretch and more sensitivity but can be a pain in the butt as far as memory and handling. I'm done with wasting money on the supposed advantages of "fluorocarbons." I'll spend half or less on a good copoly and get 98% of the benefits with alot less of the drawbacks.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|