Forums59
Topics1,050,604
Posts14,160,940
Members144,448
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
15lb -vs- 17lb floro
#6473537
08/03/11 03:00 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 651
pinesaddict
OP
Pro Angler
|
OP
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 651 |
I like 17lb i use 15lb on cranks in open water. My question is for drop shot or shakey head in 10-20ft on east texas lakes does it make that much diffrence?
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: pinesaddict]
#6473547
08/03/11 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,110
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,110 |
No. In know a lot of guys that fish that presentation on 20#
"Things turn out best for those who make the best of the way things turn out" - Zachary Troy Schrah - a young man with vision far beyond his years.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: fouzman]
#6473610
08/03/11 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 583
B_Thomas
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 583 |
So if you fish it with 20# flouro and do ok with it, why do you see a lot of people using 8#-10#. Don't mean for this to sound like a smart azz question. I am also trying to figure this out. I thought you really need to use small diameter line so that fish could not see the line.
Wish All Fair Weather And Tight Lines!
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: B_Thomas]
#6473674
08/03/11 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,762
Outdoordude
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,762 |
I don't think the water in 90% of Texas reservoirs is clear enough for line diameter to be "critical." Maybe another bite or two, sure, but at a higher risk of line breaking which could cancel out your added bite or two. And, it usually doesn't break on small fish, just saying.
Scott Jones
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Outdoordude]
#6473766
08/03/11 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 408
turbo2nr
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 408 |
i use #8 just cas i can throw it further and have no problem with bigger fish have upwords of 15lbs on 8lb line just takes a little longer
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: turbo2nr]
#6473873
08/03/11 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,648
jwallbassin
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,648 |
If your tx rigging your drop shot (bubba rig) and fishing bushes or trees I dont think line size matters as much, also like mentioned above the water is not gonna be real clear where you will be.
God Bless America
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: B_Thomas]
#6473880
08/03/11 04:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,171
buda13
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,171 |
So if you fish it with 20# flouro and do ok with it, why do you see a lot of people using 8#-10#. Don't mean for this to sound like a smart azz question. I am also trying to figure this out. I thought you really need to use small diameter line so that fish could not see the line. Flouro is 100% invisible in the water, line diameter does not matter! Go as big as you can stand to cast.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: buda13]
#6473893
08/03/11 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,525
coyotebass
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,525 |
I use the lighter flouro(6# & 8#) for light weight baits. 1/8 oz shaky heads for example. heavy line on tiny baits seems to rob some of their action for me. big shaky heads and drop shots ill go back to 17# or 20# flouro.
"GO HARD OR GO HOME"
Setting hooks for Christ I can do everything through Him who gives me strength.- Phil 4:13
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: coyotebass]
#6474549
08/03/11 06:29 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267
tommyc
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267 |
Flouro is 100% invisible in the water, line diameter does not matter! Go as big as you can stand to cast. I think I would feel less bites with 20lb as opposed to 12 or 15. I would like to believe that it is 100% invisable, though I will say that I have more confidence with fluoro as compared to mono or straight braid in clear or slightly stained water
Tom Cornelius
Romans 10:9-11
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: pinesaddict]
#6474828
08/03/11 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979
The Fishing Physicist
YOLO
|
YOLO
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979 |
I like 17lb i use 15lb on cranks in open water. My question is for drop shot or shakey head in 10-20ft on east texas lakes does it make that much diffrence? Heres the scoop on crankbaits and line. Two points. The smaller the line diameter the deeper a crankbait will dive. The denser the line the deeper a crankbait will dive. . Line density in increasing order: braid, mono/copolymer, fluorocarbon.Personally, I prefer P-Line CX Premium for a copolymer line. Seaguar InvizX is a good fluorocarbon, but P-Line Halo is also quite good, as is Sunline Sniper. Sunline Shooter is excellent line, but I view it as too low stretch for crankbaits. Below are a couple of charts showing first various brands and types of line, and pound test ratings, along with their diameters for particular pound test ratings. The second chart is information on CX Premium with respect to pound test vs. actual breaking strength vs. tensile strength; along with line diameter in both inches and millimeters. Ive yet to find any fishing line other than braid that his higher tensile strengths that CX Premium. TFP
Above all else hold these two things in the greatest of circumspection; government and self. YOLO=Schiefspiegler
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: The Fishing Physicist]
#6474887
08/03/11 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,616
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,616 |
When I am forced to drop shot I use 15# InvisX on my baitcaster.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Ken A.]
#6474937
08/03/11 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,611
big fish 1
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,611 |
Ok, just call me a smartazz but the difference is 2lbs. It don't mean a thing.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: big fish 1]
#6475053
08/03/11 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267
tommyc
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267 |
When I am forced to drop shot I use 15# InvisX on my baitcaster Tru Dat
Tom Cornelius
Romans 10:9-11
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: tommyc]
#6687010
09/30/11 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,019
Claysefus
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,019 |
30 lb braid. No stretch lets me feel what Im doing down there especially with a deeper bait. Small diameter lets me make long casts. Plus "pinesaddict" never throws a crank bait anyway!!!!!!!! Carolina riggin 12 mos outta the year!!! Dont deny.....
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Claysefus]
#6687161
09/30/11 05:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,545
timwins31
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,545 |
Is this really a post worrying about the difference in 15 and 17lb test line? FFS.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: timwins31]
#6687873
09/30/11 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,347
Hog Jaw
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,347 |
Getting tired head , twenty pound invisx on everything but top water .... Done.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Hog Jaw]
#6688110
09/30/11 09:49 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,415
CENTEX Toad Hunter
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,415 |
There is a definate difference in line size, type line and from brand to brand. Can anyone guess what that is? It's whatever you are comfortable with. Whatever makes you confident. NOW, with that said, I have perticular reels that I feel function better with one line over another. Also, IMO when fishing in extreme cold temperatures, 15# InvisX works better for me than 20#. There are four main considerations to take into account: sensitivity, memory, abrasion resistance and strength. YOU must decide what this priority is, for whatever application you are fishing and again what gives you the best confidence. With all tis said, I would not go to Falcon Lake with 10 pound test!
"If you've quit learn'n, you might'as well quit fish'n cuz yer not catch'n as many fish as ya should be!"
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: The Fishing Physicist]
#6688171
09/30/11 10:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,990
ezbassin
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,990 |
I like 17lb i use 15lb on cranks in open water. My question is for drop shot or shakey head in 10-20ft on east texas lakes does it make that much diffrence? Heres the scoop on crankbaits and line. Two points. The smaller the line diameter the deeper a crankbait will dive. The denser the line the deeper a crankbait will dive. . Line density in increasing order: braid, mono/copolymer, fluorocarbon.Personally, I prefer P-Line CX Premium for a copolymer line. Seaguar InvizX is a good fluorocarbon, but P-Line Halo is also quite good, as is Sunline Sniper. Sunline Shooter is excellent line, but I view it as too low stretch for crankbaits. Below are a couple of charts showing first various brands and types of line, and pound test ratings, along with their diameters for particular pound test ratings. The second chart is information on CX Premium with respect to pound test vs. actual breaking strength vs. tensile strength; along with line diameter in both inches and millimeters. Ive yet to find any fishing line other than braid that his higher tensile strengths that CX Premium. TFP What about CXX?
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: ezbassin]
#6688194
09/30/11 10:14 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,415
CENTEX Toad Hunter
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,415 |
"If you've quit learn'n, you might'as well quit fish'n cuz yer not catch'n as many fish as ya should be!"
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: CENTEX Toad Hunter]
#6688275
09/30/11 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 568
vicbass22
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 568 |
use 6-8lb floro here, ur askin for a heartbreak
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: vicbass22]
#6688431
09/30/11 11:53 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850
Ban-D
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850 |
Honestly do you think fish can tell a 2lb difference in a line that's invisible underwater? Also there's not many lakes around that are that clear .I only like fluidity because it sinks for cramming I've gone back to basics and pretty much throw all mono except for my frog and c rig witch I throw braid on the c rig I use a fluoro leader
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: pinesaddict]
#6688514
10/01/11 12:36 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979
The Fishing Physicist
YOLO
|
YOLO
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979 |
CXX is a good line in some circumstances. Personally, I view CXX is a much less desirable choice for crankbaits that CX, and other slim diameter lines. CXX is a fat line, by which I mean that for a given pound test rating it has a much larger than standard line diameter for that rating. Conversely, a slim line is a line that has a significantly small diameter for a given pound test rating than is standard for that pound test rating. Whats important for crankbait lines is that be of high tensile strength, and as small in diameter as you can get while still maintaining the need breaking strength. CXX is very large in diameter for the pound test rating that it is given by P-line, and is in fact very much under-rated in terms of actually breaking strength. If you match CXX in line diameter with CX the breaking strength of CX will actually be just a bit higher. Its not the rated pound test thats important nearly so much as the line diameter. Honestly do you think fish can tell a 2lb difference in a line that's invisible underwater? Also there's not many lakes around that are that clear .I only like fluidity because it sinks for cramming I've gone back to basics and pretty much throw all mono except for my frog and c rig witch I throw braid on the c rig I use a fluoro leader Youre not considering other factors than visibility of the line to the fish. Smaller diameter line has less hydro-dynamic resistance than larger diameter line. Thus, the smaller diameter line will allow a given crankbait (all other factors being equal) to dive to a greater depth than a larger diameter line. The other thing is that line vibration is an issue as well. When fishing a soft plastic weightless line vibration is not that much of a factor because your line is not under much tension. However, when retrieving a crankbait your line is under very much more tension. This means the line is at least fairly taunt, and that the line is going to vibrate to some degree. The vibrations of your line in such conditions is not negligible. Bass are capable of picking-up this vibration, and it is best to reduce this vibration as much as possible. Again, smaller diameter line due to its lower hydro-dynamic resistance is going to produce less vibration than larger diameter line with its attendant greater hydro-dynamic resistance. Finally, having a line that is stretchy is a good thing with any bait that has treble hooks as it helps keep the fish from throwing the bait. Its the same principal as using a lower power rod with a medium action. The dropshot is a whole nother kettle of angling however. Less stretch is where its at when dropshoting. My advice on dropshoting is go with a GOOD fluorocarbon, preferable 14 pound test or less Sunline Shooter if youre using baitcasting gear. The dropshot started as a finesse technique done with very light line (in terms of bass fishing) and spinning gear. Here in East Texas it has been modified into a power technique with heavier line and gear. Anything above 8 pound test line is NOT a finesse technique. So youre really talking more of a power technique when youre fishing at the LOTP. Given that, then Id advise going with Sunline Shooter in 20 pound test. This as Shooter is the lowest stretch 100% fluorocarbon that I know of, and it has a line diameter that is about what is standard for 14-15 pound test lines. TFP
Above all else hold these two things in the greatest of circumspection; government and self. YOLO=Schiefspiegler
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: The Fishing Physicist]
#6688553
10/01/11 12:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850
Ban-D
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850 |
All I'm sayin is I've seen plenty of big fish comin off straight braid my own 9.7 came of braid and I don't think she cared... Also do you think all the pros look at it from a scientific view? I think they just go with what they know and what makes them confident in catching fish...bottom line confidence is key.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Ban-D]
#6688573
10/01/11 01:09 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 40,004
Allison1
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 40,004 |
For light baits, light line makes a huge difference in how the bait works. A little 4 to 6 inch worm thats 15 to 20 foot down has better action on 6 pound line than 12 or 14. Why kill the action?
I don't see a good argument for using heavier than 10 pound test unless its because of the cover I'm fishing.
I don't really call it finesse fishing unless I'm using 6 to 10 pound line on anyway.
I am wrong but you can not prove it, you just believe it enough from the bottom of your heart.....
.......Every post you make I'll be trolling you.
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: Ban-D]
#6688600
10/01/11 01:19 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979
The Fishing Physicist
YOLO
|
YOLO
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,979 |
All I'm sayin is I've seen plenty of big fish comin off straight braid my own 9.7 came of braid and I don't think she cared... Also do you think all the pros look at it from a scientific view? I think they just go with what they know and what makes them confident in catching fish...bottom line confidence is key. I totally agree. Braid in turbid water is not a problem in terms of observability in such conditions. Further, braid has a very small diameter relative to standard line diameters for given pound test ratings for copolymer, and mono lines. I would add that Ive seen a five pound bass caught in very clear water on a wacky-wormed Cheeto, as well as some other weird stuff. That does not, however, negate, nor attenuate the fact that line with lower observability increase the probability of a strike. I certainly wont argue that experience is a fine guide to tackle choices when fishing. I was not trying to address specifics to to particular situations with respect to line selection, but rather provide a broad, and general answer to the original post. TFP
Above all else hold these two things in the greatest of circumspection; government and self. YOLO=Schiefspiegler
|
|
Re: 15lb -vs- 17lb floro
[Re: timwins31]
#6688726
10/01/11 02:01 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,019
Claysefus
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,019 |
yea your right. Good call. Thank you
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|