I am with Huckleberry. The more I use this stuff, the less I am impressed with it. I think that it has its place in certain lure presentations, but I do not believe that it makes a big difference in how many fish you will catch. I firmly believe that I have had better luck fishing with mono compared to flouro. Castability, stretch, and less memory are a good thing (i.e. mono) I do not think that flourocarbon gives a fisherman a big adavantage over one that uses mono. What I do think, is that most fisherman are just looking for the newest, hottest rage in fishing, and they forget that we are going after a fish with a brain the size of a pea.
_________________________
WORD!!