|
|
#2433956 - 07/07/08 07:38 PM
I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/20/08
Posts: 40
Loc: Plainview, TX
|
I'd never tried flourocarbon before so I put some 14lb CXX on the other night on my favorite baitcaster. Tied a spoon to it and went outside to give it a few practice casts. It quickly turned into a rat's nest that I spent the next 5 minutes fixing.
I tried it again with the same results. I did this for about 45 minutes and never got it to cast without backlashing. The only way to keep it from backlashing was to thumb it to death. I took it off and put mono back on - went back outside and could cast it a mile.
What gives?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2433961 - 07/07/08 07:39 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/20/08
Posts: 40
Loc: Plainview, TX
|
Forgot to say that it was a decent weighted spoon, so it's not like I was trying to throw something really light.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2433973 - 07/07/08 07:42 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
Angler
Registered: 01/18/07
Posts: 384
Loc: Del Rio Tx
|
It took some time for me to get used to it, i adjusted brakes and tinkered with the reel before i got it right but now it feels the same as mono with the sensitivity of braid.
James
_________________________
Im a fishing FooL!!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2433975 - 07/07/08 07:42 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 12/11/04
Posts: 4009
Loc: Weatherford
|
What brand of Fluoro was it? You really get what you put into it with Fluoro. Also try some of the line conditioners. They can make a world of difference.
_________________________
"Why should I add to the difficulties in life by facing reality??"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434018 - 07/07/08 07:53 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Fish Killer]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/20/08
Posts: 40
Loc: Plainview, TX
|
What brand of Fluoro was it? You really get what you put into it with Fluoro. Also try some of the line conditioners. They can make a world of difference. It was the P-Line CXX.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434028 - 07/07/08 07:56 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: evv59]
|
Angler
Registered: 03/25/08
Posts: 443
Loc: Tyler, Tx
|
Its you its not the line... Try 100% berkely flouro...
_________________________
Matt Mc
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434098 - 07/07/08 08:17 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Z21BassBoy]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 03/29/04
Posts: 1004
Loc: Norman
|
Its you its not the line... Try 100% berkely flouro... Pline CXX isn't a fluorocarbon line, and it isn't available in 14lb test, so I'm a little confused.
Edited by The Natural (07/07/08 08:17 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434110 - 07/07/08 08:20 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 08/22/01
Posts: 2246
Loc: Haslet TX
|
What brand of Fluoro was it? You really get what you put into it with Fluoro. Also try some of the line conditioners. They can make a world of difference. It was the P-Line CXX. Sorry, but P-line CXX isn't floro. It's a co-polymer.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434116 - 07/07/08 08:22 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: bassdreamer]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 12/11/04
Posts: 4009
Loc: Weatherford
|
And its one of the stiffest lines I have ever tried!
_________________________
"Why should I add to the difficulties in life by facing reality??"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434381 - 07/08/08 03:34 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: bassdoc]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 04/10/07
Posts: 1015
Loc: Garland, TX
|
I use BPS Flourocarbon, and don't see much difference in casting it to mono. Use some line conditioner and you should be fine. Sounds like you may have been using CoPoly? Haven't used that before, so I can't speak for it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434382 - 07/08/08 03:35 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: bassdoc]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 04/18/06
Posts: 998
|
I find that the first few casts in the morning can be touchy at times. The KVD line conditioner takes care of that. Fluoro is a good weapon to have in the arsenal. There are many applications where fluoro will put more fish in the boat for me. Fluoro just takes some getting use to. Seaguar InvisX and Berkley 100% have worked great for me.
_________________________
Tom Cornelius
Praise be to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Thanking Him, all day long
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434408 - 07/08/08 03:57 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: tommyc]
|
Angler
Registered: 01/07/08
Posts: 251
Loc: San Antonio, TX
|
Like others above have stated the P-line CXX is not true flourocarbon and is extremely stiff. It will be a nightmare for anyone that is used to using limp mono or braid. If you are going to try to use flourocarbon get a good quality limpest you can find. Seagar InvizX is one of the better on the market. With flourocarbon you can not take the cheap road when buying it as you will get what you pay for. Go to the line wall at BPS to feel and compare the different 100% flourocarbon lines. If after you give it a FAIR try and still a problem for you go to a braid main line with rod length flourocarbon leaders blood knotted to the braid.
_________________________
Let's Fish
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434575 - 07/08/08 05:14 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Limits4all]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 03/31/07
Posts: 564
Loc: Lewisville, Tx
|
i use flouro, mono and braid - different applicaations but same type of reels and i have no issues with any of them backlashing. i did when i first started using baitcasters a year ago but not any longer.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434588 - 07/08/08 05:20 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: ragin_cajuns]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/19/07
Posts: 264
Loc: EAST TEXAS
|
seaguar 100% has worked great for me and on the other rods i use floro clear. its floro coated but works great at half the price. even on a top water it works great. does not have the sink rate of 100% but yet it casts like a mono.
the seaguar 100% seems to work perfect and even use it for a weightless fluke and never backlash and still get good distance. Also i dont get the memory in the line like i did with other 100% out there.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434594 - 07/08/08 05:22 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Limits4all]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 06/08/01
Posts: 4615
Loc: Garland,TX USA
|
Like others above have stated the P-line CXX is not true flourocarbon and is extremely stiff. It will be a nightmare for anyone that is used to using limp mono or braid. Where did you get this extremely stiff from? I have spooled up 15# and 10# and find it to be a limp line.They advertize it on the box that way too. It's not a floro at all, it's a copoly.I like it so far. I still like Gamma better though, but they (BPS) were out at the time and I picked up some CXX. I'm using the 8# on a spinning rig and it works great.
_________________________
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434597 - 07/08/08 05:22 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: ragin_cajuns]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 04/21/05
Posts: 19300
Loc: Crandall, TX
|
As mentioned, use 100% fluorocarbon. Night before you fish, I do the same as with any mono. All line of these types will have memory. I hook my lure into my chain link fence and walk about 30 yds. Stretching the line to take kinks out. Only with fluorocarbon try adding KVD spray to it. It will adhere to it. Flurocarbon line afsorbs water. This will take the initial kinks out before you start. When you have made a few cast with 100% fluorocarbon line it will absorb water and become easier to cast. Hope this helped. Try Vicious or Trilene, Gamma Edge if you can afford it. Remember 100%.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434612 - 07/08/08 05:27 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 03/10/08
Posts: 32
Loc: texas
|
I use 14lb. bps fluor. for deep crankin and can cast a dd-22 on 7'-6'' rod a mile no problems.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434713 - 07/08/08 05:59 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: champion 203]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/20/08
Posts: 40
Loc: Plainview, TX
|
Ooooh well that splains it! I said I wanted to try fluoro and the guy gave me the CXX, said it was the best. Sheesh.
Will try to get my hands on some Seagur or Berkeley as per suggestions in this thread and give it a go. I'm wanting to try it on my worm rig for weightless senkos and flukes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2434988 - 07/08/08 07:40 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: bassdreamer]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/14/06
Posts: 218
Loc: Dolton,ill.
|
I really don't like floro either- I like the coplymers.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2435078 - 07/08/08 08:01 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: SkeeterHawk]
|
Angler
Registered: 01/07/08
Posts: 251
Loc: San Antonio, TX
|
Like others above have stated the P-line CXX is not true flourocarbon and is extremely stiff. It will be a nightmare for anyone that is used to using limp mono or braid. Where did you get this extremely stiff from? I have spooled up 15# and 10# and find it to be a limp line.They advertize it on the box that way too. It's not a floro at all, it's a copoly.I like it so far. I still like Gamma better though, but they (BPS) were out at the time and I picked up some CXX. I'm using the 8# on a spinning rig and it works great. Easy there SkeeterHawk, I love P-line lines too. If you like the CXX try the newer Evolution next time you need to buy new line.
_________________________
Let's Fish
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2435130 - 07/08/08 08:15 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: JLJ2018]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 06/28/07
Posts: 951
Loc: Lufkin, TX
|
What brand of Fluoro was it? You really get what you put into it with Fluoro. Also try some of the line conditioners. They can make a world of difference. It was the P-Line CXX. Don't feel "pregnant"! I tried that line and had major problems also. Finally went back to Gamma, Seguar, or BPS. They work better.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2435132 - 07/08/08 08:16 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Limits4all]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 08/24/05
Posts: 3818
Loc: DFW
|
Back lashing cannot be blamed on the line. Sure, you may have to adjust for the difference, but that's it. I don't like flouro for other reasons: breaking in the middle of a cast, breaking in the middle of a cast, breaking in the middle of a cast... you get the idea.
_________________________
We All Live Down Stream
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2435298 - 07/08/08 09:16 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Bigron119]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 07/23/03
Posts: 884
Loc: Seguin, Tx
|
Although not likely, but very possible, that particular spool of line that was backlashing could have been a bad or OLD spool of line that had become brittle/coily. As a matter of fact, I used some P-Line one time and it was terrible and I know a bunch of folks love P-Line, so I must have gotten hold of a bad spool.
_________________________
14.478 SHARELUNKER
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2436179 - 07/08/08 12:30 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: McCloud]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 06/29/05
Posts: 66
Loc: GA
|
Try the KVD Line Conditioner. It will tame the stiffness and memory down on your flouro line like crazy. It will make it behave more like mono and it will also improve your knot strength. Works great on Braid too. Makes it hold the color and factory finish 3-4 times longer.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2436419 - 07/08/08 01:34 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: robfad]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 08/24/05
Posts: 3818
Loc: DFW
|
Actually, my experience with copoly lines is much better than with straight flouro so far, and much much cheaper.
_________________________
We All Live Down Stream
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2436900 - 07/08/08 03:57 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Bigron119]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 03/12/08
Posts: 1116
Loc: East Texas/Arkansas
|
gamma edge and berkley 100% are hard to beat but i dont use flouro that much. i feel that i break off too many fish on hook sets. copoly has some stretch to it so my line doesnt bust when i cross their eyes. CXX is good stuff. but like sketerhawk said gamma co poly is better
Edited by jaykendrick (07/08/08 04:00 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2438286 - 07/09/08 02:46 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Bigron119]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 06/09/08
Posts: 995
Loc: Heath, Texas
|
berkley 100% with KVD line conditioner. If youre having a problem throwing that...
_________________________
Thomas Ross.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2438443 - 07/09/08 04:41 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: TDR2]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 08/23/07
Posts: 75
Loc: Duncanville Texas
|
For me, all P-Line products seem way too stiff like wire, and since I like copoly a lot been using Silver Thread AN40 for years no problem, I use Trilene Flouro when I need that type of line
_________________________
You can put your boots in the oven but that don't mean their biscuits
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2438581 - 07/09/08 05:45 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: SkeeterRonnie]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 06/03/07
Posts: 1036
Loc: Midland, TX
|
This was a funny post! Hard to blame birds nests on the line man! Its like blaming a slice on the club! That said some lines are easier to learn with! But you gotta get the right line. Thats not even flouro and thst some of the thickest line on the markey anyway! Chances are if its cheap or cheaper its not flourocarbon line! CXX is about 7 bucks for 600 yards at Academy, flouro is 17 bucks for 200 yards  If you want to learn to use flouro try some light test, Seaguar or 100% Trilene or even the BPS flouro and work your way from there. Im now using up to 20 pound 100% and Seaguar and I throw a lot of weight less baits on 10 and 12 pound Seaguar with no probs! Learn how to use your reels and get a decent flouro line and begin to "feel the bottom" finally  Good luck in your advaneture, it wont be a cheap one, been there done that, didnt buy the T shirt! DannyG
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2438709 - 07/09/08 06:19 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: C T]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 09/19/03
Posts: 1153
Loc: richardson tx usa
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2438860 - 07/09/08 07:05 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: SkeeterRonnie]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 05/10/05
Posts: 834
Loc: Little Elm
|
Why can't you tie a Palamor knot with Fluorocarbon?
_________________________
Rodney
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2439106 - 07/09/08 08:25 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Longeye]
|
TFF Team Angler
Registered: 11/18/02
Posts: 4711
Loc: Deep East Texas
|
Why can't you tie a Palamor knot with Fluorocarbon? So what is the prefered knot with fluoro?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2439862 - 07/09/08 11:38 AM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: RayBob]
|
Pro Angler
Registered: 07/05/05
Posts: 543
Loc: Grand Prairie
|
You can't use a palomar knot when using FC!...Poppycock!  I have used a palomar knot since way before moving to FC, and have continued to use it with FC without any problems at all...and I mean at all...period. But the key when using a palomar knot with FC is that if you are just a little bit sloppy in tying the palomar knot and allow the line to cross over itself when doing the overhand part of the knot then the portion of the line that goes around the eye of the hook will end up lying over itself instead of lying parallel to itself and when that happens it can and will cut itself. Now I can already hear the howls of protest about how someone "does not tie sloppy knots but they always have problems with FC...blah,blah,blah". If that is the case with someone then I would like to hear them explain how some folks have problems with FC cutting itself and some do not (the pros use it all the time), even when using the same exact brand and test of line? The answer is that a correctly tied palomar knot will do just fine with FC and one that is not tied perfectly will not work just fine with FC. Like it or knot (pun intended) that's just the way it is!
_________________________
Jim Wolfe
Davey Crockett to US Congress upon his resignation- "You all can go to hell, I'm going to Texas".
"You know how you can always tell when a politician is lying? Because their lips are moving"!!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2440037 - 07/09/08 12:32 PM
Re: I Tried Fluorocarbon - What a Mess
[Re: Bigron119]
|
Angler
Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 263
|
I have used invisx for about two years now. I tie an improve clinch knot and have never broke off a fish. I have also never noticed any difference in casting verses mono.
I know it is kind of pricey, but I don't feel the need to change line near as often as with mono.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|