you are hilarious ... only reason you have a problem with my one sided posts is they are on the other side of your one sided posts ... BTW you really don't know where i stand on this subject & really don't give a rip either ... you just know that i don't agree with you & that's all that matters ... right?



is that what you really hope for? ... is this tourney next weekend like being on the play ground in third grade to you?

I just stand up for myself when folks like you imply that i'm ignorant & if that makes you feel ignorant it ain't my fault ... i don't know, learn to mind your own business????

i ain't going to tawakoni to try to push anything on anybody but you keep bringing this up ... if you start spoutin' off, i'll stand my ground ... just looking for a nice day of fishing & fellowship, you need to decide that that's the only thing you're there for also

thanks ... great reply




ahemmmmmm take a lesson here go-kitty-go, oh author of dweebish drivel

wow 5 pages of @#$%^ talking. i thought i might learn something about the gene pool, but it sounds like a high school locker room to me.

Donald (AlbertKing),
Here is a survey by the Oklahoma Dept of Wildlife.

http://www.wildlifedepartment.com/research/bluecatfishmanagementresearch.pdf

It says and I quote



I am sure that your studies are much more accurate than theirs are. Hell, they should hire you. So here is data that backs up that releasing the larger Blues is great for the fishery if you want to keep Trophy Fish in the fishery. Now show us all your data that backs up what you have been mumbling about keeping the large blues does not hurt the fishery.

"Quote" Now show us all your data that backs up what you have been mumbling about keeping the large blues does not hurt the fishery.

I dont ever remember seing him say that. Mostly I got the impression he was talking Yellow fish.

This is like the carp debate.. I can hear it now..... That study was not done in Texas so it don't count.

Well, Albertking, Is heycods correct? Have you not been addressing BlueCats all this time?

so dipstick (go-kitty-go) do you know the rest of the story on that report you posted? ... NO? ... oklahoma was prolly gonna change some regs according to the study that you just posted BUT then on one lake they shocked up so many bluecats in the 30# range that you could literally walk across'um ... they were certain that the regs would be changed by 2008 but it ain't happened yet ... some speculate it may have something to do with the later shockings of all the big blues

you don't listen to anything i say ... i have said that what we are currently doing is working ... keeping a few big blues don't hurt a thing ... if we all went on a campaign to catch & eat all the big blues we could prolly just about wipe'um out ... our catfish are not in trouble and need to be bailed out with some new regs that force everybody to only keep fish 10# & under

and that's where the propaganda comes in ... if you wanna release all you fish over 10# on a voluntary basis & then braodcast like HEY AIN'T I SPECIAL & many many do that, then that's great ... but don't try to make me do it too or don't try to make me shamed faced for eatin' some big cats

take your BS AGENDA AND SHOVE IT WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE

in most lakes there are far more blues than yellas ... anybody that would eat a yella under 10# ain't got any gumption but many do it & throw back the ones a lil bigger, thinking they are some great hero conservative because of all the stigma that has been attached to eatin' big fish by the likes of BS elitists like you go-kitty-go

Where is the data to back up what you say? I showed you data. You said you needed to see proof - where is yours? You wanna just call people names when you get the facts that you asked for since you have no real data. I could give a rats a$$ if you keep fish or not but don't act goofy when other people release fish and then you get a chip on your shoulders.
So, since you know the rest of the story please post it. Educate us all on this and show the report of where there was enough "Bluecats in the 30# range that you could literally walk across'um" . That sounds a little far fetched even coming from you but as you would say "show me proof".

are you being stupid here or dishonest?

who is the elitist? Are you trying to push your "keep no flathead under 10# agenda"?

"Bluecats in the 30# range that you could literally walk across'um"

Who is being dishonest? Show proof of the statement you made above.

What a big waste or server space this has become ,maybe we could have tribal council and vote someone off the forum. I have to let all the big fish go because it would look bad for me to let just a few people keep them while making others release them. Just my way of taking care of what takes care of me.

finally

I agree Steve. Albert seems to have piped down.

did somebody break wind?

That's great Albertking, you are now a comedian. Still waiting on the proof of that earlier statement of yours. "Bluecats in the 30# range that you could literally walk across'um" It was so profound.

Funny how you ask for proof from others and then you make up BS to try and prove your point....