|
|
#1995305 - 02/21/08 11:30 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Green Water]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 14185
Loc: LA and TX
|
Dont know if it's been mentioned, but the Mako and Kenner inshore models are the same boats now. Look at a new Mako inshore and the serial number will start with "KEN". If you dont want a liner boat, and dont care about a lot of storage, a Kenner VX rolled edge model can be a bargain, compared to the Vision series. Lighter, less fuel consumption, etc. But it isnt fancy.
_________________________
The only easy day was....yesterday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995307 - 02/21/08 11:31 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Green Water]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 01/31/08
Posts: 90
|
Looks like a sweet deal to me
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995400 - 02/21/08 11:59 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: croakerdrowner]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 14185
Loc: LA and TX
|
Lots of guides used Kenner VX models for lots of years.
_________________________
The only easy day was....yesterday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1995981 - 02/21/08 01:51 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Oldfrog]
|
Green Horn
Registered: 02/21/08
Posts: 14
|
The EuroSport is too big, too heavy, and not suited for bay use at all. The 200 will strain pushing that boat and guzzle fuel. The 24v trolling motor won't push my 23ft Marshall Intimidator very well. I have a 101lb 36v and that gets the job done. P.S. It does well in both conditions. I get 5.6 mpg at 55mph with my Evinrude E-tec 250 H.O. at 4500 rpm, however, this will run you well over $20K. I fish in Redfish Tournaments and it is perfect. It will get up in about 10in depending on the bottom. The Haynie 24 H.O. is also going to run upper 30s and is a pad hull (built for speed).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1996258 - 02/21/08 02:50 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Redfish Fanatic]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
I liked the 24' Kenner and the 24' Make inshore, guess there's a reason why.
Also like the Haynie H.O. Specs say it'll get up in about 17".
Whatever boat I get will have a kicker. I have a 15 hp. The larger boats may require more.
I'm not as worried about performance as most are. Anything should be better than what I have now. 70 hp on a 20' boat. It gets up quick but is slow.
I'll probably do more offshore than bay. The main reason I want to stay with a shallower draft is so I can still run the little lakes and rivers I fished for the past 20 years before moving to Houston.
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1996372 - 02/21/08 03:17 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Green Water]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
Edited by eight (02/21/08 03:26 PM)
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1996468 - 02/21/08 03:39 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: eight]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 12/09/05
Posts: 2092
Loc: Dallas/Padre
|
No clue.. But I am not a fan of Johnson engines power packs were always the problem when we tried Johnsons. http://bbcboards.zeroforum.com/zeroforum?id=36Ask the Cajun forum for their opinion. -Z-
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1996499 - 02/21/08 03:50 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Green Water]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/12/05
Posts: 444
Loc: Cen-Tex
|
I have some pals that have a boat like that and they go to the jetties and offshore on select days. Those boats don't ride very DRY or smooth in rough/big water. Not the perfect rig, but it will work. imho.
_________________________
<")}}}*>< Pathfinder 2200V
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1997151 - 02/21/08 07:14 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: SpecialK]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 01/31/08
Posts: 90
|
Looks like it would be hot as hell with the dark interior baking away during the summer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1997582 - 02/22/08 03:40 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: RossF]
|
Outdoorsman
Registered: 12/18/06
Posts: 119
Loc: Lake Dallas Texas
|
Lots of good information, seems easier if we would just tell you which boats to avoid. Please excuse my two cents but few to none of the boats mentioned above are considered top quality boats.They are upper middle for sure, but in buying a used boat maybe consider a top brand that will hold together longer. Now you may not want a top quality boat and that is ok. I did not need that at first and my Trophy 1903 was just fine, had it in the gulf many times. However once you have researched and experienced many boats it becomes clear what the differences are between the "top" boats and everyone else. Someone mentioned MAKO, that they were a great boat. I am sure they are seaworthy and whatnot, have a good hull shape etc...BUT it is the fit and finish and solidness of ride that separate the top five manufacturers from everyone else I looked extensively at the MAKO's sitting at Bass Pro and the $66000 price tag. I was apalled at the unorganzized wiring mess and sloppy fiberglass work and the cheapness of the fittings. Had I not studied other boats I would not have known. All that being said: Go look at a Whaler or a Grady or a Robalo or a Triton and you will see what I mean. They are all of top quality construction down to the last bolt. So I bought the Triton 2486, got it for less that the Mako mentioned, brand new. The solidness of ride, lack of rattling hatches, handling etc and quality fit and finish are worth it. My Triton is rock solid. Now it is a bit heavier than others because all the materials are the real thing. Brass, stainless, real glass windshield etc. For used boat, quality is even more important. Get an older model of one of the top brands and you will love it. Which leads me to my final point. Get anything you want because you have to start somewhere and you will then learn what you want next time. If you are gonna fish the Gulf dont get a bay boat, go down to Houston and get your boat there, there are plenty of dealers here that can warranty service. There are very few saltwater hulls here in DFW, Houston is full of them. I made two weekend trips to find what I wanted, at least you will learn alot. Good luck! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1997861 - 02/22/08 06:20 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: CaliforniaJeff]
|
Capt. CUDA
Extreme Angler
Registered: 07/01/04
Posts: 1779
Loc: little elm tx
|
Hey Jeff. I sure loved the color of your old Trophy! Honestly, Eight, Jeff makes a good point in that no matter what you buy, once you've had it out a few times you ARE going to find things you dont like & dont work for what you wanna do. that the learning curve. You can't possibly know what you need until you spend time figuring out what those things actually are. Give it due diligence, find a boat you like, that will do what you want it to, safely. put the time in, and when you're ready for the next boat ( & there will be a next boat..) You'll know EXACTLY what you want. tight lines -Brian
_________________________
"OOOHHH! I got one, Daddy!"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999105 - 02/22/08 12:20 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: lite-liner]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 14185
Loc: LA and TX
|
Well spoken, Jeff. I think, after looking back at the original post, he wanted it to float in skinny water, too. Here's my take on the subject..( for what it's worth..lol !)..: While I know that beautiful Trophy of yours will take taller seas better than the larger bay boats, I dont think I want to be too far offshore in anything shorter than 65 feet if a 24 foot bay boat cant handle the seas. Been there, done that. Not fun. ( Zodiacs are excluded in this...I'll go nearly anywhere in a Zodiac) So if he wants to get into skinny water and also wants to make short runs offshore, price-wise, he's probably better off with a shallower draft than most of the boats you mentioned. Of course, we'd all like a Whaler, but let's face it, they cost too much and most used ones are worn out. If I'm concerned about going offshore in a 22-24 foot bay boat on a given day, then maybe I dont need to go at all that day. Dang, that's a pretty Trophy !
_________________________
The only easy day was....yesterday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999277 - 02/22/08 01:12 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: lite-liner]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
I am in Houston. Need to update my info, moved from Katy to the northwest side. What do yall think of this one? Aquasport 215 http://www.boattrader.com/listing/1998-Aquasport-215-91787466Specs say 15" draft with engine up, 33" draft engine down. So the bottom of the engine is really 18" lower than the hull? I wonder how much it could take off in with a jack plate and trim tabs.
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999291 - 02/22/08 01:23 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: eight]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
So I should just sell off the flat bottom and rig my 12' Avon Rover for offshore fishing? With a 10hp motor, I used to run a whole weekend on a 3 gallon tank of gas. It would fly with the 10hp too, hurt the back some when it landed though. It would be alot of fun with the 25 hp max rated engine.
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999329 - 02/22/08 01:35 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: eight]
|
TFF Celebrity
Registered: 10/10/07
Posts: 6519
Loc: Lake Slimestone
|
Edited by Huckleberry (02/22/08 01:36 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999378 - 02/22/08 01:51 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Huckleberry]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 14185
Loc: LA and TX
|
I've run two Aquasports and they were both good boats. I dont know about the new ones, though. It's not going to get into skinny water, for sure, but I've been caught in a storm coming in from the Chandeluer Islands in a old 222 Aquasport. It was a rough ride, but as you can see, I made it back.
_________________________
The only easy day was....yesterday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1999519 - 02/22/08 02:35 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: Oldfrog]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
I'm not worried about what I call "skinny" water. I just want to be able to take off in 2' of water. I've got plenty of friends with shallow water boats, and another friend will likely buy my current boat.
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2001590 - 02/23/08 12:59 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: eight]
|
TFF Guru
Registered: 02/16/06
Posts: 14185
Loc: LA and TX
|
2 feet is skinny if you are running a heavy load with something like an Aquasport Explorer. The draft figures they publish is never anything like the "real world", in my experience. You have falling tides to deal with, too.
_________________________
The only easy day was....yesterday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2002110 - 02/23/08 05:19 PM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: JacksboroTX]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 09/21/07
Posts: 1879
Loc: San Angelo
|
_________________________
Accept that some days your the pigeon and some days you're the statue.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2010358 - 02/26/08 08:33 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: throwback]
|
Angler
Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 334
Loc: NW Houston
|
So what the deal with catamarans? Not flatscats, but the offshore type. Do they generally draft shallower than deep-v hulls? How's the ride?
_________________________
Fishing is always good, its the catching that varies.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2010370 - 02/26/08 08:36 AM
Re: Boat for bay & offshore
[Re: eight]
|
Extreme Angler
Registered: 02/18/04
Posts: 1088
Loc: Waco, TX, USA
|
I have a Nitro Bay 2200 which is the same as the Kenner's made now. Its a great boat. Can run pretty shallow and still handle going off shore or fishing the jetties, etc. Its a great all-around boat for me.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Bob Smith, FattyMcButterpants, Jerrybign, jsmoove007, Mark Perry, mrbass24, PROLINE19, RedSkeeter, Rudy Cortinas, sharonwilson01, Stan Browning
|