Doug Hannon's WaveSpin System
Main Menu
Forum
Guidelines/Rules
Academy Photo Contest
TFF Store
Guides/Destinations
Contact/Advertising
Hunting Forum
Other Forums
Advertisement
Affiliates
J.P. Greeson's Weekly Fishing Report
Larry Bozka's Coastal Anglers
Dallas Morning News Outdoors
Texas Fishing & Outdoors Show
Secrets of the Bays Fishing Show
Honey Hole All Outdoors Television
Barry Stokes’ Southwest Outdoors Report
Academy Outdoors Show
Advertisement
Newest Members
BigSlim, ruger204, TEXASLEFTY, MattJay, duckkillah
34917 Registered Users
Top Posters
David Lee 30018
FattyMcButterpants 28327
John175 ® 27013
TexDawg 21167
TreeBass 20979
SkeeterRonnie 20625
Big Red 12 20580
a777pilot 20550
Pilothawk 19616
Tritonman 18958
AnglerSurvey.com
Topic Options
#1921488 - 01/28/08 12:36 PM 2002 Tundra
dartman Online   content
Angler

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 250
Loc: Wills Point
Does this seem like a good buy? I will be towing a 22 ft X-Press around 2500 to 3000 lbs I would guess. I am using a 3/4 ton now but want to save some gas.

2002 Toyota Tundra Long Bed

V6 3.4 Liter engine
Automatic transmission
2WD, Towing Pkg
Pickup Shell/Cap (snug fit)
A/C, AM-FM, PS
72,400 miles
Very Clean vehicle
Excellent Condition

$9,000.00

Top
#1921930 - 01/28/08 02:40 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: dartman]
Tallgrass05 Online   content
TFF Celebrity

Registered: 03/02/05
Posts: 9595
Loc: Kansas
The Toyota 3.4L V-6 is pretty solid, but I think just a bit underpowered for a Tundra and towing. You might end up burning more gas.
_________________________

Top
#1922272 - 01/28/08 04:35 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: Tallgrass05]
deasley Offline
Angler

Registered: 06/19/07
Posts: 450
Loc: Joe Pool Lake Arlington, TX
yes you will consume about as much fuel when you tow your boat as you do know with your current truck but when not towing you will get considerably better fuel economy. also the 3.4L is very capable of towing 3000lbs.
_________________________

Top
#1923074 - 01/28/08 08:28 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: deasley]
MBradford Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 06/01/02
Posts: 1061
Loc: Saginaw, TX
I have the same motor in a 4WD Tacoma, and it takes over 2 tanks of gas to tow my 18' bay boat from Ft Worth to Port A. The truck tows just fine, but dang, it sucks down the gas.
_________________________

Top
#1923632 - 01/29/08 07:15 AM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: MBradford]
dartman Online   content
Angler

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 250
Loc: Wills Point
What is ment by the towing package? Is that special gearing and heavier springs or just a receiver. I have never looked at a Toyoya. I have been a Ford man for over 60 years.

Top
#1923770 - 01/29/08 08:18 AM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: dartman]
91cajun Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 07/04/06
Posts: 628
Loc: DFW, Texas, USA
When I have looked at smaller trucks, the fuel economy is not much different unless you get a realy dinky one. I also fell like I'm wearing it they are so small. The new Tundra's look ok but, the bed is too short for me. I'll bet it doesn't have enough leg room either. I'll admit, I haven't bothered to check the MPG on the new Tundra but, I'll bet it's still less then 20 MPG and in reality will only get 14-15 just from the aerodynamics. Towing it will probably be 8 MPG.
_________________________
91 Cajun, Johnson 115

Top
#1923803 - 01/29/08 08:31 AM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: 91cajun]
redchevy Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 01/25/05
Posts: 730
Loc: Cibolo, Tx
I drove one for work for a couple of years that routinely got about 17 miles to the gallon, or roughly one mpg better than my '94 chevy with a 350 got, not wortht he change to me. Pluss when you put a load in it or pull something stay away from hills, it just aint got it, especialy for a 3000 lb trailer.

matt

Top
#1923889 - 01/29/08 09:02 AM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: dartman]
deasley Offline
Angler

Registered: 06/19/07
Posts: 450
Loc: Joe Pool Lake Arlington, TX
 Originally Posted By: dartman
What is ment by the towing package? Is that special gearing and heavier springs or just a receiver. I have never looked at a Toyoya. I have been a Ford man for over 60 years.


towing package includes supplemantal oil coolers transmission cooler heavy duty alternater (130amp) heavy duty battery and a class 4 hitch with a 7 pin connector with converter to a 4 pin on the current models.
_________________________

Top
#1924616 - 01/29/08 01:15 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: dartman]
Stratos58 Offline
Pro Angler

Registered: 02/14/05
Posts: 507
Loc: TX
Well,,,,,,,,since I own a 2006 Tundra,which I like. I would stay with a bigger truck. Not going to save that much gas,JMO. I have a 17' Strato's and my 6 cyl sucks the gas pulling it. But I do not tow that much. Like the truck in town and on the road. I get about 19 or 20 mpg. If I was towing my boat all the time I would have stayed with my dodge. Hope that helps! ;\)

Top
#1925900 - 01/29/08 07:44 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: Stratos58]
dartman Online   content
Angler

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 250
Loc: Wills Point
Thanks everyone I think I will just pass on it. I only would use it for towing my boat and what I have is working now. I was going to keep it anyway to put my 16 ft trailer and tractor around. No need for two trucks.

Top
#1932292 - 01/31/08 06:10 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: dartman]
throwback2332 Offline
Angler

Registered: 01/05/07
Posts: 255
Loc: Sherman, Texas
I just traded in my 2002 v8 4.7 liter tundra access cab I pull a a 20ft nitro bass boat with no problem plus 275/60/20 in tires. Stops fine pulls good, I just bought a '07 tundra double cab for the room haven't tried pulling yet only 10 grand miles

Top
#1934922 - 02/01/08 03:50 PM Re: 2002 Tundra [Re: throwback2332]
RCP Offline
Extreme Angler

Registered: 12/28/05
Posts: 2904
Loc: Little Elm, TX
I have a Tacoma with the 3.4 and it does ok. I wouldn't want the 3.4 in a Tundra though.
_________________________

Top



©2007 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
.