Forums59
Topics1,039,358
Posts13,963,345
Members144,201
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
A non tournament anglers view on FFS
#15006377
03/03/24 09:43 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033 |
Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think?
Last edited by SC-001; 03/03/24 09:45 PM.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006381
03/03/24 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,374
Chasin Hogs
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,374 |
I think like most things it'll be split. I've heard that's bad a$$ and also Dam that's cheating!
If I had to pick one I would say most would call it cheating.
By the time I get one it'll be obsolete. Lol.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006383
03/03/24 09:52 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151
Terry W.
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151 |
No worse than feeding trophy deer 24/7 , then shooting them 50 yards away LOL
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006385
03/03/24 09:53 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033 |
They all hunt low fence but do bait.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006388
03/03/24 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,108
beartrap
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,108 |
if you use food plots or feeders to attract deer and cameras to determine their feeding times,would that be cheating and "deer shooting" instead of deer hunting?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: beartrap]
#15006394
03/03/24 09:57 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151
Terry W.
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151 |
if you use food plots or feeders to attract deer and cameras to determine their feeding times,would that be cheating and "deer shooting" instead of deer hunting? Exactly
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006395
03/03/24 09:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533 |
Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think? Honestly if they are not involved in the activity or tournaments then I'm not overly concerned with their opinions on it. They obviously have zero time using it and a very basic or even limited understanding of it. Casually they are free to think what they want. People who don't use it tend to think kooks it's push and play. It's not.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006396
03/03/24 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204 |
Oh look, another ffs thread. Found your dead horse
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006405
03/03/24 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think? Tell your avid deer hunters to put away their guns,, throw a corn cob with a hook in it to their deer. Convince the deer to eat it, then reel the deer in. Hiding and shooting a deer from a blind in a baited area is cheating.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006408
03/03/24 10:16 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751
Douglas J
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751 |
Those that don't or can't usually hate on the unknown.
It's sadly the American way
#MFGA
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006411
03/03/24 10:18 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196 |
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: tmd11111]
#15006413
03/03/24 10:19 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151
Terry W.
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 151 |
Oh look, another ffs thread. Found your dead horse That's the best ever LOL
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006425
03/03/24 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,033
Techfisher
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,033 |
I do have to laugh at all the so call deer hunters I know here in Oklahoma. 99% of them have corn feeders set out somewhere. They drive to their spot and wait until that buck shows up and bag it. They wouldn't last 5 minutes hunting deer in the Rockies where I used to hunt deer and elk. You are up before daylight, hiking up a mountain, walking the ridge lines, glassing slopes, checking out ravines and creek areas. If you do spot a deer/elk you want and you shoot and hit it then the work begins. You have to get it out. You may be several miles from camp and the terrain is not easy to pack an animal out. You quarter the animal and pack it out on your back with a pack frame. It may take you all day to do that.
Now the guys from Texas that would come to Colorado to hunt were something else. Big horse trailers, squad size tents, the whole setup. Drinking all night, maybe getting out around noon. Rode their horses in a few miles in the middle of day and seeing nothing. Stop by our camp and wanted to know where we got our deer/elk...:) Couldn't believe we hunted on foot...:) Best reply I ever heard was from a Marine buddy I used to hunt with.." Jim Beam ain't gonna do your scouting or hunting for you". We'd have a beer after everything was done and our animals were back in camp. Just our unspoken agreement to do it that way.
Now that is real hunting...not the corn feed hunting style that I see around here. To each his own I guess.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006427
03/03/24 10:34 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507
Harleydude
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507 |
I assume these family members are all 100% spot and stalk hunters to make such claims.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: tmd11111]
#15006429
03/03/24 10:35 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,418
Minner Bucket
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,418 |
Oh look, another ffs thread. Found your dead horse
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006437
03/03/24 10:40 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444
Floon Swenson
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444 |
I enjoy tourney fishing, both watching and competing. That said, tech was getting a bit much for my own personal enjoyment way back in the late 2000's. I sold my Alpha 211 and downsized. Later I moved to kayaks and went back to fly gear for 90% of my fishing.
I enjoyed watching these guys do their FFS deal over the last couple weekends. It has been informative, imo. I just don't want to play that game, myself, when I get on the water. I appreciate what they're doing, though. I do see where there could be legitimate considerations for limiting this stuff in competitive environments, but I guess that all depends on what kind of product you're looking to produce as the promoter.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006489
03/03/24 11:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11,574
txmasterpo
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11,574 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: txmasterpo]
#15006492
03/03/24 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up Tournament fees should pay for what? It’s not like they are leasing the lake/ you are more than welcome to pull up on a pro and fish right next to him.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: txmasterpo]
#15006494
03/03/24 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up Yeah, that will fix it, more government regulations. SMH
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006499
03/03/24 11:45 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
They all hunt low fence but do bait. They probably have cameras that link to their phone so they can see what's hitting feeder every day also.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006530
03/04/24 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,833
David Welcher
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,833 |
for a small phenomenal fee I can take your buddies out fishing and give them a FFS lesson.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Douglas J]
#15006538
03/04/24 12:29 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
Those that don't or can't usually hate on the unknown.
It's sadly the American way 1000%
“Slide”
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006569
03/04/24 01:01 AM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,268
Rayzor
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,268 |
I don't care one way or the other, but I don't think it is cheating. No more than a hunter using a scope on his rifle.
Be safe, Rayzor 2001 Triton Tx-21/225 Mercury EFI
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Rayzor]
#15006570
03/04/24 01:04 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533 |
I don't care one way or the other, but I don't think it is cheating. No more than a hunter using a scope on his rifle. Have you ever used GPS, lake maps or 2D, SI or DI sonar?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: grandbassslayer]
#15006584
03/04/24 01:24 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,770
basscaster46
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,770 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up Tournament fees should pay for what? It’s not like they are leasing the lake/ you are more than welcome to pull up on a pro and fish right next to him. Lmao you would be the first guy on the forum crying because some recreational angler was in some jack [censored]’s spot or to close .
I got all day I’m retired
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: basscaster46]
#15006592
03/04/24 01:29 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up Tournament fees should pay for what? It’s not like they are leasing the lake/ you are more than welcome to pull up on a pro and fish right next to him. Lmao you would be the first guy on the forum crying because some recreational angler was in some jack [censored]’s spot or to close . You have me confused for someone else, I’ve been on the water fishing during elite events.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Rayzor]
#15006611
03/04/24 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,627
Razorback
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,627 |
I don't care one way or the other, but I don't think it is cheating. No more than a hunter using a scope on his rifle. It's not cheating because they all do it, or can do it if they want. I will say that I think it makes breaking all-time records less impressive. Justin Hamner said when he caught the 11-7 that he had seen that fish all four days and kept coming back until he finally caught her. It occurs to me that if Roland Martin or Denny Brauer had fished a tree in 10 feet for two days without a bite he wouldn't keep running back there on days three and four to fish it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: WAWI]
#15006639
03/04/24 02:03 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033 |
No worse than feeding trophy deer 24/7 , then shooting them 50 yards away LOL if you use food plots or feeders to attract deer and cameras to determine their feeding times,would that be cheating and "deer shooting" instead of deer hunting? Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think? Tell your avid deer hunters to put away their guns,, throw a corn cob with a hook in it to their deer. Convince the deer to eat it, then reel the deer in. Hiding and shooting a deer from a blind in a baited area is cheating. I assume these family members are all 100% spot and stalk hunters to make such claims. They all hunt low fence but do bait. They probably have cameras that link to their phone so they can see what's hitting feeder every day also. You guys can deflect all you want, I'm just saying what I observed from impartial viewers. And I bet most others might have the same re-action.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006641
03/04/24 02:05 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204 |
You guys can deflect all you want, I'm just saying what I observed from impartial ignorant viewers. And I bet most others might have the same re-action.
FIFY
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006642
03/04/24 02:08 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033
SC-001
OP
TFF Celebrity
|
OP
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,033 |
...and you guys shoulda heard the comments when I showed them the Zaldain video of the electronics setups for the Bassmasters Elites, can't post some of that language here Some people in the industry need to take a 1000 foot view.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006644
03/04/24 02:10 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,204 |
...and you guys shoulda heard the comments when I showed them the Zaldain video of the electronics setups for the Bassmasters Elites, can't post some of that language here Some people in the industry need to take a 1000 foot view. All I hear is you're too technologically challenged or too broke to afford it. Thats pretty much the only group crying about it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006659
03/04/24 02:20 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507
Harleydude
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507 |
...and you guys shoulda heard the comments when I showed them the Zaldain video of the electronics setups for the Bassmasters Elites, can't post some of that language here Some people in the industry need to take a 1000 foot view. Heck even I thought some of those set ups were ridiculous and I am all for FFS. I like the toys!
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006660
03/04/24 02:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533 |
...and you guys shoulda heard the comments when I showed them the Zaldain video of the electronics setups for the Bassmasters Elites, can't post some of that language here Some people in the industry need to take a 1000 foot view. How would they know much about any of it to start with?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006684
03/04/24 02:33 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
...and you guys shoulda heard the comments when I showed them the Zaldain video of the electronics setups for the Bassmasters Elites, can't post some of that language here Some people in the industry need to take a 1000 foot view. You should not use it then.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006685
03/04/24 02:34 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
I'm gonna scope up 5 bass and filet them in honor of this post tomorrow
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: WAWI]
#15006698
03/04/24 02:43 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
I'm gonna scope up 5 bass and filet them in honor of this post tomorrow You ain’t scoping up 5 fish. That’s pro level kinda stuff.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SteezMacQueen]
#15006707
03/04/24 02:49 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
I'm gonna scope up 5 bass and filet them in honor of this post tomorrow You ain’t scoping up 5 fish. That’s pro level kinda stuff. How bout 25 crappie and 1 bass.....
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: WAWI]
#15006716
03/04/24 02:56 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
I'm gonna scope up 5 bass and filet them in honor of this post tomorrow You ain’t scoping up 5 fish. That’s pro level kinda stuff. How bout 25 crappie and 1 bass..... That’s much more realistic.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006760
03/04/24 04:01 AM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 575
Kodyjoe
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 575 |
Don't have it but if I did I sure wish I was good as the young guns Would not give a dam what anybody said about it
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006833
03/04/24 12:10 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,109
buda13
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,109 |
Every “casual” fisherman I’ve shown or explained FFS to have said one of two things… that’s cheating, or that’s not fishing. I’m not an FFS hater at all, really enjoying learning it. The hunting references were funny. It’s like taking a thermal scope out at night and shooting bedding animal 1/4 mile back in the woods from the cab of your truck. Straight sniping!
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Mark Perry]
#15006843
03/04/24 12:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172
hopalong
Pescador Loco
|
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172 |
I don't care one way or the other, but I don't think it is cheating. No more than a hunter using a scope on his rifle. Have you ever used GPS, lake maps or 2D, SI or DI sonar? exactly, how is ffs any different than si or di tech? all 3 will show you fish the trick is to catch those fish, good luck with that. I have it and don't consider it cheating any more than having si/di since all 3 show about the same thing.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: tmd11111]
#15006858
03/04/24 12:44 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,045
ogles824 (aka Lakewaydr50)
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,045 |
Tournament fishing is a tiny percentage of fishing....it's a public resource though....so sooner or later, if the wrong people get pisses off, you never know what could happen....I personally think Tournament fees that are substantial should be paid for these things.....and any other Tournament of more than 20 boats should require a permit by the county......guide license is a joke and it's a grossly oversaturated deal on these public resources....wish that license required a 1000 $ fee and insurance of 250k..... FFS is just a symptom....our society is driven by shortcuts and instant gratification.... go watch a high school Tournament..... can't even compete without be able to spend considerable money....so, it's just that, driven by money..... makes me want to throw up Yeah, that will fix it, more government regulations. SMH Yep more government regulations........
2012 ZX200 Skeeter 2012 Yamaha 200 SHO Isaiah 40:31 "but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles, they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint. Proud student of the Pro Staffer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzwF72B2F2w&t=14s
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006871
03/04/24 01:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
All these casual and non-anglers weighing in makes me wonder. Since when does anyone care WHAT they think? Most of them would tell you it’s insane to have more than 2 rods, throw back fish instead of frying them up, or cheating to use side-scan and scent infused baits like power worms. Since when are they the great deciders?
“Slide”
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Cuervo Jones]
#15006874
03/04/24 01:16 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
All these casual and non-anglers weighing in makes me wonder. Since when does anyone care WHAT they think? Most of them would tell you it’s insane to have more than 2 rods, throw back fish instead of frying them up, or cheating to use side-scan and scent infused baits like power worms. Since when are they the great deciders? Exactly
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006879
03/04/24 01:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
TxBazzn
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 596 |
It’s not cheating the competition but it’s cheating the sport. There’s a reason why the elite fields keep getting younger. It used to take years to learn to pattern and predict fish. Not anymore.
And if Deer hunting was a competitive sport with a league, then I would say get rid of baiting, high fences, and game cameras for them. The rest can use it as they see fit. But it’s also cheating the sport.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: buda13]
#15006882
03/04/24 01:24 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
Every “casual” fisherman I’ve shown or explained FFS to have said one of two things… that’s cheating, or that’s not fishing. I’m not an FFS hater at all, really enjoying learning it. The hunting references were funny. It’s like taking a thermal scope out at night and shooting bedding animal 1/4 mile back in the woods from the cab of your truck. Straight sniping!
No it’s not. All these ridiculous comparisons. You don’t shoot bass with your lure, the livescope doesn’t identify bass, it identifies an object swimming in the water, you have to free hand cast a lure in their direction and they have to decide to eat it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: TxBazzn]
#15006942
03/04/24 02:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196 |
It’s not cheating the competition but it’s cheating the sport. There’s a reason why the elite fields keep getting younger. It used to take years to learn to pattern and predict fish. Not anymore.
And if Deer hunting was a competitive sport with a league, then I would say get rid of baiting, high fences, and game cameras for them. The rest can use it as they see fit. But it’s also cheating the sport. Yeah, because these kids just instantly get qualified for the BASSMASTERS, you’ve been on there for how long now?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15006957
03/04/24 02:25 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
Whole lotta complaining boils down to: “Learning to catch fish was difficult for me because I didn’t have the helpful tools that are available today. Therefore the tools are bad, people who use them are cheating, and GET OFFA MY LAWN!”
“Slide”
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Cuervo Jones]
#15006979
03/04/24 02:48 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444
Floon Swenson
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444 |
Whole lotta complaining boils down to: “Learning to catch fish was difficult for me because I didn’t have the helpful tools that are available today. Therefore the tools are bad, people who use them are cheating, and GET OFFA MY LAWN!” I really don't feel that's an accurate representation of the rub that people are having with this.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Floon Swenson]
#15007017
03/04/24 03:20 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
Whole lotta complaining boils down to: “Learning to catch fish was difficult for me because I didn’t have the helpful tools that are available today. Therefore the tools are bad, people who use them are cheating, and GET OFFA MY LAWN!” I really don't feel that's an accurate representation of the rub that people are having with this. It seems pretty close. They keep throwing in deer hunting or spotlighting arguments- those folks aren’t worthy of a response as their fake comparisons are so far disconnected from livescope.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: grandbassslayer]
#15007027
03/04/24 03:30 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751
Douglas J
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751 |
Whole lotta complaining boils down to: “Learning to catch fish was difficult for me because I didn’t have the helpful tools that are available today. Therefore the tools are bad, people who use them are cheating, and GET OFFA MY LAWN!” I really don't feel that's an accurate representation of the rub that people are having with this. It seems pretty close. They keep throwing in deer hunting or spotlighting arguments- those folks aren’t worthy of a response as their fake comparisons are so far disconnected from livescope. Most of the people that bass fish and especially tournament fish can't catch sh** anyway. Most could not cash a check if you put 25# in their bathtub
#MFGA
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15007028
03/04/24 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172
hopalong
Pescador Loco
|
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,172 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: hopalong]
#15007031
03/04/24 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751
Douglas J
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Because the people who cannot catch them anyway do not understand how much of an advantage SI and DI are because they cannot catch anything unless it's spring time on a bank somewhere.
#MFGA
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: hopalong]
#15007076
03/04/24 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Because people who like sight fishing for bass in the spring when they're at their most vulnerable are somehow opposed to doing it with electronics when they're less stressed and at risk.
“Slide”
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: hopalong]
#15007085
03/04/24 04:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Because there probably is not a logical answer.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: hopalong]
#15007086
03/04/24 04:33 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 834
wabash2015
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 834 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Seeing the fish react to lures and baits, in real time, is a huge difference between SI or DI.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Cuervo Jones]
#15007094
03/04/24 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 257
Dale Gribble
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 257 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Because people who like sight fishing for bass in the spring when they're at their most vulnerable are somehow opposed to doing it with electronics when they're less stressed and at risk. This is pretty damn profound right here. The same crowd that cry's it's not sporting probably loves themselves some bed fishing.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: wabash2015]
#15007097
03/04/24 04:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 72,533 |
someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
Seeing the fish react to lures and baits, in real time, is a huge difference between SI or DI. Either way you are seeing the fish and using technology to do so. It's like arguing that it's OK to get drunk on beer but not whiskey.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15007199
03/04/24 06:35 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,389
Jpurdue
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,389 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think.
"Bragging may not bring happiness, but no man having caught a large fish goes home through an alley." -A.L. www.LunkerLore.com
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: hopalong]
#15007249
03/04/24 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
Whole lotta complaining boils down to: “Learning to catch fish was difficult for me because I didn’t have the helpful tools that are available today. Therefore the tools are bad, people who use them are cheating, and GET OFFA MY LAWN!” I really don't feel that's an accurate representation of the rub that people are having with this. It seems pretty close. They keep throwing in deer hunting or spotlighting arguments- those folks aren’t worthy of a response as their fake comparisons are so far disconnected from livescope. Most of the people that bass fish and especially tournament fish can't catch sh** anyway. Most could not cash a check if you put 25# in their bathtub I’d have a five pound dead fish penalty. someone explain to me why ffs is any different than SI or DI.
SI/DI is a picture of what “was”….past tense, history….FFS is real time live. Big difference.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Jpurdue]
#15007257
03/04/24 07:26 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,020
sprigsss
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,020 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. 100% Only thing is if you put in enough TOW and do master this technique, you can use it and win 12 months out of the year with 1 pattern/technique, where that would be nearly impossible with almost any other technique.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15007262
03/04/24 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
It’s a different pattern technique if you have to use a different lure
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15007306
03/04/24 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,655
BrandoA
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,655 |
I have only been on boats with FFS while fishing for hybrids/stripers. I have zero experience while fishing for bass. using one ( hopefully soon though) My take is FFS will make good fisherman better and bad fisherman confused. I will say that for me fishing for stripers/hybrids it was almost to easy once I figured out what I was looking at but I wouldn't say it was easy. One thing that striper fisherman have always done is be able to fish open what and distinguish different species of fish. I can't wait to learn how to use it fishing for largemouth.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Jpurdue]
#15008299
03/05/24 07:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 143
Jeeper92
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 143 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. Excellent post. I have been trying to catch with FFS similar to what I see on Bassmasters/MLF and having a tough time. These are excellent points and speak the difficulty of it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Jpurdue]
#15008319
03/05/24 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 167
Houston Basscat
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 167 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. But once you can do all that, you're better than the Greg Hackney. Your list, although difficult, is certainly doable. The problem is once you are able to do all those things you are far more efficient and better at capturing 5 big bass than even the most experienced and talented of bass pros. It's far easier to learn the steps you describe and utilize them rather than spend an entire lifetime learning the art of bass fishing through trial and error. This tool totally levels the playing field.
Last edited by Houston Basscat; 03/05/24 07:47 PM.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15008325
03/05/24 07:46 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
What’s the problem with being better than Greg hackney? These guys aren’t gods..
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: grandbassslayer]
#15008335
03/05/24 07:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 167
Houston Basscat
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 167 |
What’s the problem with being better than Greg hackney? These guys aren’t gods.. I have no problem. I love FFS. You sound happy.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Jpurdue]
#15008345
03/05/24 08:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 257
Dale Gribble
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 257 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. This is a well written version of what I have been trying to say as well. I have spent at least a hundred hours trying to not suck at FFS for Bass The naysayers just don't have a clue how hard it is.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Houston Basscat]
#15008352
03/05/24 08:09 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507
Harleydude
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 507 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. But once you can do all that, you're better than the Greg Hackney. Your list, although difficult, is certainly doable. The problem is once you are able to do all those things you are far more efficient and better at capturing 5 big bass than even the most experienced and talented of bass pros. It's far easier to learn the steps you describe and utilize them rather than spend an entire lifetime learning the art of bass fishing through trial and error. This tool totally levels the playing field. There is that term again. The “ART” of bass fishing. If someone figures out how to kick your butt working smarter instead of harder then maybe the art wasn’t as good as originally thought. Why do folks assume these newer guys don’t know the “ART” of bass fishing as well? I’d be willing to bet that 19 year old could whip the majority of the folks in here without FFS. Not to mention the time he and others have put in to hone their skills with FFS through the same trial and error you claim the artists only use.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15008353
03/05/24 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
McKinney is in the latest issue of bassmaster where they drop a guy on a random lake with no practice and do an article. He ran all over the lake and caught fish using a variety of techniques.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15008358
03/05/24 08:21 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,196 |
The olds haven’t realized that the secret to fishing, is to fish where the fish are. They like to throw at nothing.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: grout-scout]
#15008365
03/05/24 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
The olds haven’t realized that the secret to fishing, is to fish where the fish are. They like to throw at nothing. That’s me.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15008570
03/05/24 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,343
EastTexasBassin
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,343 |
Won't be long before we have full 360 degrees livescope with drone tracking. Put your goggles on and see every fish within a hundred yards. 😁
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Houston Basscat]
#15008573
03/05/24 11:07 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 40,444 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. But once you can do all that, you're better than the Greg Hackney. Your list, although difficult, is certainly doable. The problem is once you are able to do all those things you are far more efficient and better at capturing 5 big bass than even the most experienced and talented of bass pros. It's far easier to learn the steps you describe and utilize them rather than spend an entire lifetime learning the art of bass fishing through trial and error. This tool totally levels the playing field. Your old guy is showing
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009250
03/06/24 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444
Floon Swenson
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 9,444 |
I feel fundamentally restrained that electro-fishing isn't allowed for recreational anglers.
Spot it n' shock it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009266
03/06/24 03:37 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 41,039
CCTX
mapquest
|
mapquest
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 41,039 |
Are we allowed to tag bass, for research purposes of course; with a metal tag with a very strong sonar return so we can see them better on live sonar?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Floon Swenson]
#15009267
03/06/24 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
I feel fundamentally restrained that electro-fishing isn't allowed for recreational anglers.
Spot it n' shock it. I was pre fishing a tournament a few years back, run down a bank about 100 yards and don’t get a bite. Well here comes a boat I’ve never seen before and it was the fisheries department shock boat. He shocks that water and I was amazed at how many bass I had fished thru- he was scooping them up as fast as he could…🤷♂️😂
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: CCTX]
#15009333
03/06/24 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,020
sprigsss
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,020 |
Are we allowed to tag bass, for research purposes of course; with a metal tag with a very strong sonar return so we can see them better on live sonar? I've seen a guide release a fish with a long length of mono tied to a balloon so he could follow the schools in open water.......... Are there rules against that?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: sprigsss]
#15009338
03/06/24 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751
Douglas J
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,751 |
Are we allowed to tag bass, for research purposes of course; with a metal tag with a very strong sonar return so we can see them better on live sonar? I've seen a guide release a fish with a long length of mono tied to a balloon so he could follow the schools in open water.......... Are there rules against that? if he had FFS he would not need that trailer park tracking device
#MFGA
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009339
03/06/24 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 41,039
CCTX
mapquest
|
mapquest
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 41,039 |
Only if the balloon/mono set up is for "research purposes"?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009350
03/06/24 04:52 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,108
beartrap
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,108 |
several years ago got invited to observe a sprayboat on Eufaula (Al.) in spring of the year.......couple real interesting observations....we did several miles of electroshocking along east bank of eufaula in lower part of the lake....the shock boat shocked almost no bass or fish along bare banks but if there was grass/weeds exrending out from the bank,they shocked up numerous bass,crappie,catfish and carp many of which were probably bedding in the grass....... I was in my boat using trolling motor to stay a little ahead and out from the shock boat....when we would pass grass beds,I saw numerous large bass swim out of the grass to deeper water before the boat got close enough to shock them...they probably shocked up over 200 fish of all species that I saw come to the top and many of them got away before they could be dipped up....
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009689
03/06/24 10:18 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 260
Marion Morrison
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 260 |
Opinion only.
I think it takes away from fishing. Two of the biggest challenges I faced in tournaments was the question: Did my fish leave the area or am I throwing the right bait? Do I move now since the fish may have moved or do I wait them out?
These are strategic questions every angler asks if they are seriously trying to catch fish. FFS will tell the answer and in my opinion takes a lot of the strategic thinking out of fishing.
Why does an angler need a crankbait for all depths any more? Why does an angler need a ton of rod and reels with different actions, different types of line, and different sizes now? Why does an angler need search baits that cover water? The list goes on and on. Answer from watching TV on any recent Saturday, they don't...
Everyone has a different opinion but this is mine.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009728
03/06/24 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 756
Bassinamped
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 756 |
Guys mad on here probably get mad they can’t compete with the FFS guys because they spend too much time griping about FFS rather than going fishing! 😂
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Marion Morrison]
#15009733
03/06/24 11:20 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,439 |
Opinion only.
I think it takes away from fishing. Two of the biggest challenges I faced in tournaments was the question: Did my fish leave the area or am I throwing the right bait? Do I move now since the fish may have moved or do I wait them out?
These are strategic questions every angler asks if they are seriously trying to catch fish. FFS will tell the answer and in my opinion takes a lot of the strategic thinking out of fishing.
Why does an angler need a crankbait for all depths any more? Why does an angler need a ton of rod and reels with different actions, different types of line, and different sizes now? Why does an angler need search baits that cover water? The list goes on and on. Answer from watching TV on any recent Saturday, they don't...
Everyone has a different opinion but this is mine. That’s a solid take on the subject.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Marion Morrison]
#15009746
03/06/24 11:42 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
Opinion only.
I think it takes away from fishing. Two of the biggest challenges I faced in tournaments was the question: Did my fish leave the area or am I throwing the right bait? Do I move now since the fish may have moved or do I wait them out?
These are strategic questions every angler asks if they are seriously trying to catch fish. FFS will tell the answer and in my opinion takes a lot of the strategic thinking out of fishing.
Why does an angler need a crankbait for all depths any more? Why does an angler need a ton of rod and reels with different actions, different types of line, and different sizes now? Why does an angler need search baits that cover water? The list goes on and on. Answer from watching TV on any recent Saturday, they don't...
Everyone has a different opinion but this is mine. We all get an opinion, I respect yours, I’ll just counter and say that livescope doesn’t change all of those things- it may make it faster to solve the puzzle, but as we have seen with our own eyes the past few weeks- it’s still a very difficult puzzle that few can solve…
Last edited by grandbassslayer; 03/06/24 11:42 PM.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009753
03/06/24 11:43 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
If any of the guys going home without cashing a check had the skills then they would’ve used them.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009788
03/07/24 12:34 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
I was out today and using crankbaits with FFS. Still need and use different depth divers. Still search for fish. They’re hard to spot among rocks and weeds. Still a lot of casting and looking around. It’s not all like you see on tv.
“Slide”
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009807
03/07/24 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,868
ezbassin
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,868 |
Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think? "Deer Hunters" right???? So they set up a feeder for the deer to come to and eat before deer season so they get used to coming to it. Then they set up a deer blind that blends in with the surroundings , put on oils that cover the human scent so the deer won't smell you, you sit there with a high powered rifle with a scope and shoot the deer when it comes up to eat. HOW IS THAT NOT CHEATING, THAT IS NOT HUNTING, THAT IS AMBUSHING DEER. So based on what they said about FFS being cheating, did you tell them that they need to leave the gun at home and chase down the deer and kill it by hand. See how well they do at that.
Last edited by ezbassin; 03/07/24 01:07 AM.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: SC-001]
#15009812
03/07/24 01:05 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,868
ezbassin
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,868 |
No worse than feeding trophy deer 24/7 , then shooting them 50 yards away LOL if you use food plots or feeders to attract deer and cameras to determine their feeding times,would that be cheating and "deer shooting" instead of deer hunting? Had some family over at the house for Sunday dinner, all are very avid deer hunters and casual bank fisherman but aren't in the know about tournament fishing or the new sonar technology. Had the Fork event on and their take on FFS was, "that's cheating", "shouldn't be allowed in competition". Just a casual observation from some non biased outdoorsman. Makes me wonder if this might be the standard view by most not entrenched in the sport, what do yall think? Tell your avid deer hunters to put away their guns,, throw a corn cob with a hook in it to their deer. Convince the deer to eat it, then reel the deer in. Hiding and shooting a deer from a blind in a baited area is cheating. I assume these family members are all 100% spot and stalk hunters to make such claims. They all hunt low fence but do bait. They probably have cameras that link to their phone so they can see what's hitting feeder every day also. You guys can deflect all you want, I'm just saying what I observed from impartial viewers. And I bet most others might have the same re-action. They are NOT IMPARTIAL viewers like you say. Ask them why they cheat at deer hunting but think FFS is cheating in fishing. I guess your "impartial hunters" think it is ok to cheat shooting deer but you should not use FFS for catching fish. That is my "non biased" opinion of the deer hunters you speak of from an impartial viewer.
Last edited by ezbassin; 03/07/24 01:21 AM.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Cuervo Jones]
#15009864
03/07/24 02:27 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 11,157 |
I was out today and using crankbaits with FFS. Still need and use different depth divers. Still search for fish. They’re hard to spot among rocks and weeds. Still a lot of casting and looking around. It’s not all like you see on tv. You mean you weren’t out shooting 8 pounders with your lures like all the naysayers here suggest?
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: Jpurdue]
#15009895
03/07/24 03:02 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,853
Dr JL
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,853 |
I think a lot of people don't realize how difficult FFS is to use. I have fished with multiple FFS gurus including JJ. I know exactly what they are doing and how they do it. I have FFS on my boat and most days if I use it, I do WORSE than if I don't. Certainly, in terms of numbers. 1. You have to move to find fish. If you aren't ultra proficient with your trolling motor and boat control you wind up going so slow you never find fish or so fast you over run them when you do find them. Otherwise, you try and stop the boat by reversing the trolling motor and then can't relocate the fish you stopped for. 2. You have to be able to tell what you are looking at. For most people what they see on the screen, especially at first, it looks like the code from the matrix. Distinguishing a carp, a catfish, gar, or a tilapia from a bass is not easy. Even harder is determining size of the fish you are casting at. JJ could tell the size of a bass to within 1 lb when I was with him. Some lakes, including my home lake, are so full of trash fish everywhere you point the transducer there is a wall of fish. How do you tell the difference between a 5lb tilapia and a 5lb bass? It's not easy. I once asked JJ what he thought the biggest mistake people were making using FFS was and he said wasting time casting at 12lb carp. Another hot west texas lake that is putting out tons of DDs right now is so full of crappie, millions of them, that unless you have an ultra-trained eye its near impossible to distinguish a bass from all the static. 3. Once you find a fish you then have to be able to make the perfect cast at a fish that is likely moving from a boat that is likely being blown around in the wind. 4. Once you make that perfect cast you have to keep the fish and the lure in the small cone of the transducer to be able to see what's going on. 5. Once you've done all that you have to present the right lure (one you can actually see with FFS) to the fish. 6. Once you've selected the right lure you have to present it to the fish in the right way. Sometimes that's a steady retrieve 6 feet above them. Sometimes you've got to drop it right on their nose. The variations are limitless. 7. After all that, you've still got to get the fish to bite. About the only time it's "easy" is when there are no trash fish, no wind, and they'll hit an A-rig. I do quite well in those situations which is about 2% of the time. It's 10X harder than most people think. Good post. IMO-(def could be wrong)-FFS used correctly in the right hands IS WAY different and obliterates competition(on average over time) who don’t or can’t use FFS as adroitly. I sure the heck know it makes a huge difference for big bass fishing. And FFS is pretty cool imo. These young guys are dang good-I’m amazed watching them. It’s not cheating because anyone can use it-so anybody that wants to compete better get really really good at it.
|
|
Re: A non tournament anglers view on FFS
[Re: grandbassslayer]
#15010037
03/07/24 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 584 |
I was out today and using crankbaits with FFS. Still need and use different depth divers. Still search for fish. They’re hard to spot among rocks and weeds. Still a lot of casting and looking around. It’s not all like you see on tv. You mean you weren’t out shooting 8 pounders with your lures like all the naysayers here suggest? Amazing, right? Some people make out that if you use FFS, you’re glued to the screen, wiggling a crappie jig on a spinning rod all day because they see tourney guys doing that. It’s just a version of the sonar we’ve all been using for decades. SHOCKINGLY, I was also able to watch the flocks of sandhill cranes migrating north, a great blue heron stalking the shallows, pelicans flying inches above the water in huge v-shaped formations, and baby turtles bobbing along in a shallow bay.
“Slide”
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|