texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Brad2587, C Man, Cameron Gose, Jetskirentals512, Flashin Assassin Lures
119183 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,070
TexDawg 119,800
Bigbob_FTW 95,347
John175☮ 85,919
Pilothawk 83,274
Bob Davis 82,397
Mark Perry 72,493
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,951
Posts13,956,303
Members144,183
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Jeff From Iowa] #12837759 07/22/18 08:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
C
Cmack Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Jeff From Iowa
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
If it was going to put more fish in the boat then every pro on tour would buy rod boxes full of them. Instead they have 100.00-250.00 sponsor ship rods. Quantum, Abu, shimano, castaway, BPS etc.
Guess KVD would win every tournament he entered if he fished GLoomis NRX rods.



You post makes zero sense.

That would be like expecting Nascar drivers to all race a toyota if that is the dominant car that year...


Where the captain derails the train is the statement "every pro on tour would buy rod boxes full of them" The pros don't buy them, if they were having to supply their own equipment without sponsorship do you reckon KVD would fish Quantum [censored] or run a Nitro boat???? Yes indeed, were it not for sponsorship $$$$$ you'd see a lot more NRX being proudly displayed.


Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Jeff From Iowa] #12837838 07/22/18 10:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 386
C
Capt. Bryan Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
C
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 386
Originally Posted By: Jeff From Iowa
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
If it was going to put more fish in the boat then every pro on tour would buy rod boxes full of them. Instead they have 100.00-250.00 sponsor ship rods. Quantum, Abu, shimano, castaway, BPS etc.
Guess KVD would win every tournament he entered if he fished GLoomis NRX rods.



You post makes zero sense.

That would be like expecting Nascar drivers to all race a toyota if that is the dominant car that year...


I was making a point, if they are so much more sensitive than any other rod on the market then every top pro would use them. Right off hand I cant tell you any Bassmaster elites who fish them.


Skeeter FXR 21
Yamaha
Humminbird/Garmin
Lews
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Capt. Bryan] #12837850 07/22/18 10:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
C
Cmack Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
Originally Posted By: Jeff From Iowa
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
If it was going to put more fish in the boat then every pro on tour would buy rod boxes full of them. Instead they have 100.00-250.00 sponsor ship rods. Quantum, Abu, shimano, castaway, BPS etc.
Guess KVD would win every tournament he entered if he fished GLoomis NRX rods.



You post makes zero sense.

That would be like expecting Nascar drivers to all race a toyota if that is the dominant car that year...




I was making a point, if they are so much more sensitive than any other rod on the market then every top pro would use them. Right off hand I cant tell you any Bassmaster elites who fish them.


Waaaay too much emphasis on what the pros are doing Capt. Like I said earlier, if not for sponsorship $$$$ the decks of those Elite would be covered with NRX. They really are that much better.


Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12837862 07/22/18 10:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,000
Neal G Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,000
If you are not a very good bass angler an NRX will not help you be competitive.
If you are a very good angler an NRX will not help you be more competitive.
Just like golf clubs folks.

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12837888 07/22/18 10:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 834
I
Ibock Online Happy OP
Pro Angler
OP Online Happy
Pro Angler
I
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 834
I spoke with a rod builder I wont say who the other day who said he could build a comparable rod close to the NRX for 170 bucks. Based on what I am hearing yall say there is no way that would be possible right?


Ibock

PB between 8-9 pounds.
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12837892 07/22/18 11:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,501
J
jbcarroll3000 Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,501
Originally Posted By: Isaiah Bock
I spoke with a rod builder I wont say who the other day who said he could build a comparable rod close to the NRX for 170 bucks. Based on what I am hearing yall say there is no way that would be possible right?


Buy it. See what the quality is. Write a report and let us all know.

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Capt. Bryan] #12838026 07/23/18 12:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
J
Jeff From Iowa Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
Originally Posted By: Jeff From Iowa
Originally Posted By: Capt. Bryan
If it was going to put more fish in the boat then every pro on tour would buy rod boxes full of them. Instead they have 100.00-250.00 sponsor ship rods. Quantum, Abu, shimano, castaway, BPS etc.
Guess KVD would win every tournament he entered if he fished GLoomis NRX rods.



You post makes zero sense.

That would be like expecting Nascar drivers to all race a toyota if that is the dominant car that year...


I was making a point, if they are so much more sensitive than any other rod on the market then every top pro would use them. Right off hand I cant tell you any Bassmaster elites who fish them.


No they would not, unless of course G loomis paid them more than their current deal.

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12842624 07/26/18 03:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,516
Ken A. Offline
Groovy
Offline
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,516
My guess is that every single person on this forum owns something that another person would view as extravagant and quite possibly a "waste of money."

I bought a ping-pong paddle in 1973 that was $30. That was like $300 in today's dollars. And it wasn't because I was from a well-to-do family.

What's your extravagant thing?



Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ken A.] #12842668 07/26/18 03:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
C
Cmack Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Ken A.
My guess is that every single person on this forum owns something that another person would view as extravagant and quite possibly a "waste of money."

I bought a ping-pong paddle in 1973 that was $30. That was like $300 in today's dollars. And it wasn't because I was from a well-to-do family.

What's your extravagant thing?


I agree, my extravagance is Rolex watches. I don't consider my NRX extravagant nuts


Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12842836 07/26/18 06:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,509
S
Slade Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,509
This has been said before, and I completely agree. Using an NRX for flipping, frogs, square bills, deep divers, topwaters, swimbaits, etc. Is overkill.

If you are throwing a football jig, C rig, T rig, fishing deep brush piles, etc. I have not found a better rod. I can feel what I come in contact with so much better that I can work football jigs over stumps, misc cover without getting hung up more than I can other rods, I feel the right type of bottom better, I feel the subtle bites better.

I don't fish tournaments, I don't care what everyone else is using, its all about getting an edge on bigger fish, and I know I throw a lot of money away chasing those big ones, but I love every minute of it.


PB 10.58 Joe Pool

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12842841 07/26/18 06:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 231
F
FlatBack4 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
F
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 231
I would think that would depend on which people are "some people".

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ken A.] #12842859 07/26/18 06:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,374
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,374
Originally Posted By: Ken A.
My guess is that every single person on this forum owns something that another person would view as extravagant and quite possibly a "waste of money."

I bought a ping-pong paddle in 1973 that was $30. That was like $300 in today's dollars. And it wasn't because I was from a well-to-do family.

What's your extravagant thing?


The stereo system on my boat! $1200 Focal speakers. Made in France. With a nice little Mosconi amp. So I can listen to the Rangers games while I fish.

But....that was the tip of the iceberg. It was leftover stuff from my Jeep. <<<<even the wife didn't know how deep I was on that stereo system. But, then again, I have some Martin Logan stats in my living room. They cost more than I paid for my house in '93.

I really love music and cannot listen to it unless it's "right". cheers


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12842936 07/26/18 07:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447
J
Jumpin J Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447
I have to disagree with the golf club comparison. If two different rods were tested, (like golf clubs), with automated arms holding them, then the most sensitive rod wins the feel test. I get that the rods wont make you something you're not, but if you can add more sensitivity, why not. I know what they are, and I love the NRX, and agreed that most all of the top three or four rod companies all make a more costly, more sensitive rod. A lot of guys out there spending $500. on a Driver shaft, also, doesn't make them a Tour player, but makes them better overall, with their game, if that graphite blank quality enhances their productivity.

Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12843297 07/26/18 11:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,000
Neal G Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,000
Guys try to buy "a competitive game" in fishing and golf by buying high dollar stuff when they should be buying lessons and playing/practicing/fishing more.
Sensitivity does not mean chit when you are in the wrong fishing location and/or otherwise clueless.

More than likely you are the marketing profile target for $500 rods which is fine as I have several myself (thus my opinion on $200 or $500 rods).

Some of the best tournament anglers are using cheap stuff by comparison and win $s. Yes, I know they are paid....

Last edited by Neal G; 07/26/18 11:24 PM.
Re: Are G. Loomis NRX as good as some people say? [Re: Ibock] #12843545 07/27/18 02:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447
J
Jumpin J Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 447
It is true, some people's ability doesn't match up with the quality of their equipment. Like I said, a rod won't make you something you're not. However, once a person reaches a certain level of competency, better equipment will definitely make it more enjoyable. Now, the brand, style, price, are all for the consumer to decide, and the most expensive is not always the best, that's why there are so many choices, thank goodness.

Last edited by Jumpin J; 07/27/18 02:57 AM.
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3