More reading if you�re bored. http://www.sjra.net/about/facts/water-supply-reservoir/

Yes sir...130,000 cfs of water headed downstream versus 79,000 cfs headed downstream. Seems like a no brainer to me what gets me is the lawsuit reading "intentional flooding occurring in October '94, May 2000, June '01, May '04, March '16, April '16, and August '17"...as if anyone wants to intentionally flood someone's home how about at some point realize that you've built/bought a house in a flood zone, and get the heck out of there. Seems like common sense to me. I helped a friend move after the flood of '94...it didn't take but one time for him to realize "I bought a house in the wrong area, I'm moving to higher ground"

Maybe you need to get out more. 2 8's in 6 months does not make it a bucket list lake. That can and does happen on just about,any lake in Texas.

I'm no hydrologist by any stretch of the imagination BUT I cannot see how lowering a lake the size of Conroe by just 2 feet will have little effect if any if another Hurricane such as last year comes along. Think of how much water we're talking about here, the flooding was Conroe X 250 and deeper than 2 feet in most areas. Another thing to think about. Last years rain totals were how much?? If those same totals go a little further north where would 5 feet of rain go? There has to be another solution!!

2 ft low ...then fish off shore structure.

I would think a retainage reservoir along the San Jacinto between FM 2854 and I-45 would have to help.

Ok I don't understand this 4 foot of water under the docks rule. How do they regulate how deep the water is where you build you dock? If its 10 foot deep where you build your dock does someone come in and put in dirt until you only have 4 foot of water? I mean my dock here at Lake Graham has 14 foot of water under it, my neighbor only has 8 foot under his. I mean I don't think I have ever seen a lake where the shoreline is all the same depth.