texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Brad2587, C Man, Cameron Gose, Jetskirentals512, Flashin Assassin Lures
119183 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,062
TexDawg 119,800
Bigbob_FTW 95,347
John175☮ 85,918
Pilothawk 83,274
Bob Davis 82,393
Mark Perry 72,492
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,935
Posts13,955,800
Members144,183
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly #12380991 08/10/17 10:29 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 20
LoneOakBuffaloFan Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 20
Looking at both these aluminum boats (19ft range). Center console, camo versions to both fish & hunt. Any comments/recommendations between these 2 boats? Using the Boat Builder apps on both their sites it seems the Lowe boat has more options (and looks to be higher priced) and is where i am leaning.....

Re: Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly [Re: LoneOakBuffaloFan] #12381022 08/10/17 11:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 5,413
T
TCK73 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 5,413
My cousin has a 20' Lowe 2070 CC with a 115 Merc on it. It is a decent boat, but It is far from being a Scandy or Boat Right. It will flat out rattle your teeth out in chop too. The compartments won't keep anything dry and the hull is too thin IMO at .100". The Tracker's I have looked at and worked on had poor craftsmanship all over them. I have welded more than a few cracks on Tracker, Lowe, Xpress, and Alumaweld boats over the years FWIW.

Re: Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly [Re: LoneOakBuffaloFan] #12381028 08/10/17 11:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,957
B
Bob Landry Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,957
Be sure you are comparing apples to apples.Tracker has low advertised prices and minimal options from the factory. They offer the low price with the smallest motor they can use, usually a 40HP, maybe a 60. At any rate the boat is delivered from the factory woefully underpowered. For a 18-19ft boat, I would want at least a 90HP. My Seaark 1872 has a 90 and there are days I wish I had more. Look at the builders spec plate and get the biggest motor that the boat is rated for. You will not regret spending the extra money. Also the trolling motor and electronics on both boats are going to be low end so you may want to negotiate leaving those off and buying aftermarket, which you will probably end up doing anyway. My buddie's Crestliner came with a Lowrance with a 5" screen and it's pretty much useless.


2015 Seaark 1872 MV CC Etec-90
Two Helix 12 CHIRP SI's, , MinnKota Riptide ST80/i-pilot Link, Bob's Hydraulic
2020 Robalo R200 CC, Yamaha 150

Bitter Gun Owner
Bitter Clinger
Armed Infidel
Re: Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly [Re: LoneOakBuffaloFan] #12382085 08/11/17 05:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,621
P
psycho0819 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
P
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,621
Don't overlook The Xpress XP series boats. I bought one 4yrs ago and haven't regretted it yet. Found it to be better constructed and cheaper than Lowe or Tracker once the deal was done. There are better boats to be had, but for the price my Xpress has held up well to my use.

My advice on the color, unless you need the camo color, consider a white or off-white as they will be much cooler in the sun. I can walk on mu boat barefooted and couldn't even hold my hand on the deck of a camo boat in the sun.

Like I said, there are better boats to be had, but at significantly higher prices. Any mod-v will be rough in chop, it's simply unavoidable due to the design. if one wants a good rough water ride, a hyperlift hull from xpress or a step up to a glass rig would be the way to go.


If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
Re: Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly [Re: Bob Landry] #12382512 08/11/17 10:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,818
doctorxring Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,818
Originally Posted By: Bob Landry
Be sure you are comparing apples to apples.Tracker has low advertised prices and minimal options from the factory. They offer the low price with the smallest motor they can use, usually a 40HP, maybe a 60. At any rate the boat is delivered from the factory woefully underpowered. For a 18-19ft boat, I would want at least a 90HP. My Seaark 1872 has a 90 and there are days I wish I had more. Look at the builders spec plate and get the biggest motor that the boat is rated for. You will not regret spending the extra money. Also the trolling motor and electronics on both boats are going to be low end so you may want to negotiate leaving those off and buying aftermarket, which you will probably end up doing anyway. My buddie's Crestliner came with a Lowrance with a 5" screen and it's pretty much useless.



I learned the hard way years ago that ^^^THIS^^^ is gospel about powering boats

.


You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free
Re: Lowe Roughneck vs Tracker Grizzly [Re: LoneOakBuffaloFan] #12384029 08/13/17 04:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 132
A
AKMike Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
A
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 132
Hydro turf the deck, it isn't cheap but you feet and back will be happier. It's a lot more forgiving than hot metal, most of my buddies bow fishing rigs have it and they swear by it.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3