texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
jesseh413, Brad2587, C Man, Cameron Gose, Jetskirentals512
119184 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,070
TexDawg 119,800
Bigbob_FTW 95,347
John175☮ 85,919
Pilothawk 83,274
Bob Davis 82,397
Mark Perry 72,493
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,955
Posts13,956,365
Members144,183
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Brush Pile vs Submerged timber #12326486 07/06/17 02:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 474
S
Sandblaster Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 474
This is one of those questions that has probably been asked several times before but what is the difference between a brush pile and submerged timber?
I'm guessing submerged timber is exactly that a tree that is underwater but then I guess the real question is what is a brush pile? What does it look like out of the water?

Thanks for any input?


"It has been said that the Lord does not count the days spent fishing against your total allotment."
Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12326495 07/06/17 02:36 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 428
S
Sangelle Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 428
Submerged timber is usually thought to be standing or fallen whereas brush piles are man made to resemble a natural lay down or standing timber.

Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12326518 07/06/17 02:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 16,064
K
KidKrappie Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
K
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 16,064
They are pretty much the same. The only difference is that submerged timber typically has older larger limbs and usually come up off of the bottom a good ways while brushpiles tend to have more small limbs and are usually closer to the bottom. IMO, Submerged timber tends to spread the fish out more as they cover more area than brush will.

Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12326524 07/06/17 02:55 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,097
SLABXPRESS Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,097
What they said...
IMHO: Timber usually holds fewer but better fish. BPs, especially if large enough, will hold better numbers with lots of dinks.
If I'm filling the freezer, I'm hitting BPs. If I'm going for big tourney fish, I'm hitting timber.


Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12327337 07/07/17 01:14 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 474
S
Sandblaster Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 474
Thanks


"It has been said that the Lord does not count the days spent fishing against your total allotment."
Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12327700 07/07/17 10:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,439
Gamblinman Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,439
submerged timber does damage to fiberglass boats and lower units. Brushpiles, not so much.

Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12328307 07/07/17 05:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
B
Ben Ther Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
good point Gamblinman

Re: Brush Pile vs Submerged timber [Re: Sandblaster] #12328598 07/07/17 08:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 973
C
Crappie Cat Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
C
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 973
Imho the brush piles IN the timber will have
a lot more active fish..




Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3